- Related Stories
-
Vista gets out of PC sync
June 7, 2006 -
On the hunt for Vista bugs
May 30, 2006 -
Vista debut hits a delay
March 21, 2006
The company kicked off what it called its "Customer Preview Program," a testing period in which the software maker hopes millions of tech enthusiasts will kick the tires on the new operating system.
"Microsoft today kicked off the Windows Vista Customer Preview Program (CPP), providing the broadest access yet to pre-release test versions of Windows Vista," the company said in a statement. Microsoft is aiming to wrap up testing and development of Vista later this year in hopes of a broad launch in January. The company released Beta 2 last month to a more limited group of testers and had promised the broader test would come shortly.
The software maker is still cautioning that Vista is not ready for the average consumer, pitching the CPP as suited for developers and tech workers, as well as hard-core enthusiasts who don't mind a few bugs and have a spare machine for testing. Microsoft also recommends those interested in the CPP run its recently released adviser tool, which helps detect how Vista-ready a PC is.
People can either download the software from Microsoft's Web site or pay a small fee to get it on DVD.
Although Microsoft is looking for millions of testers, it has said it may cap the test program at some point.
See more CNET content tagged:
Microsoft Windows Vista, software company, download, Microsoft Corp., Microsoft Windows





File transfer stops every 50MB.... on CABLE!
Cheers,
nic
A download manager will not cure that problem and if you were using a decent browser, none is needed because the better browsers will continue a download from the point at which it was cut off when the next attempt to download is made. In fact, Microsoft's site will automatically do the same as it has always done for major upgrades such as Service Packs.
Jim
Customer Preview Program.
You have received the maximum number of Product Keys available
for this program.
Note: Windows Vista Beta 2 can be installed and activated on up to
10 PCs using with one Product Key.
File transfer stops every 50MB.... on CABLE!
Cheers,
nic
Customer Preview Program.
You have received the maximum number of Product Keys available
for this program.
Note: Windows Vista Beta 2 can be installed and activated on up to
10 PCs using with one Product Key.
A download manager will not cure that problem and if you were using a decent browser, none is needed because the better browsers will continue a download from the point at which it was cut off when the next attempt to download is made. In fact, Microsoft's site will automatically do the same as it has always done for major upgrades such as Service Packs.
Jim
d/l, is any indication of the final product, LOOK OUT!!!
Just say no to usertracking, and having to go through a circus act just to get access to an ISO file.
d/l, is any indication of the final product, LOOK OUT!!!
Just say no to usertracking, and having to go through a circus act just to get access to an ISO file.
I think Penny Arcade said it best, when speaking on the so-called "zealots": "M$, from the depths of my parents' basement, I STAB AT THEE!"
Mycro the next few weeks, how will they ever streamline and fix all
this information? Easy, they can't. Any january release will be just
another beta.
No. Although the underlying kernel is BSD, OS X is a licensed version of BSD originally developed by Jobs when he was out of Apple and running his own company. it is actually Job?s modified NeXT. Certain parts of the code are open source, but not all of it. The only really open source code Apple uses is for its browser, Safari.
Mycro the next few weeks, how will they ever streamline and fix all
this information? Easy, they can't. Any january release will be just
another beta.
No. Although the underlying kernel is BSD, OS X is a licensed version of BSD originally developed by Jobs when he was out of Apple and running his own company. it is actually Job?s modified NeXT. Certain parts of the code are open source, but not all of it. The only really open source code Apple uses is for its browser, Safari.
Everything is in beta. Yahoo.com, MyNewPlace.com, AIM Instant Messenger, Windows Media Player, Windows Vista....
dang...
Everything is in beta. Yahoo.com, MyNewPlace.com, AIM Instant Messenger, Windows Media Player, Windows Vista....
dang...
You didn't think that MS could copy others work properly did you?
Some immediately complained that the interface was too different and that it looked MAC'd out. Which with some degree I would agree, however we did get lucky and they did not remove the options for classic views and themes.
Among some of the first things I noticed. It was a 9GB install. Good grief! Second, this is a version of the 'Home Edition' which will not give corporate users like myself the ability to see exactly how this will affect our customers and users.
It was very apparant how this will affect home users. Any time you attempt to change a setting or delete a file. You are endlessly bombarded with confirmation screens. My guess is this is one of Microsoft's 'security' features to prevent viruses from changing system settings. However what this will lead to (as I already see with XP SP2) is that users (even plant managers) will download or even buy applications like 'Click Yes' that will automatically hit OK when presented with an OK or Cancel option. This is because users get fed up with having to click ok everytime they leave a secured site, or other similar requests and prompts that they do not know how to shut off. This leads to many problems. The first being with users having to confirm soo many items they don't even know what they're confirming anymore. If they were prompted to install a virus, they may just go ahead and click OK.
Another problem this leads to is when they do have these 'Click Yes' programs, it can be very difficult to diagnose problems until you figure out they have one of these applications.
Other issues we noticed were some of the network options had been removed, and navigation of the new theme tended to confuse even long time users of Windows. The 'Run' command was removed from the new start menu, however it is available in classic view.
One of the features we did like was the 'compatibility mode' When we attempted to install a piece of software it said it could not run as it was incompadible and asked me if I would like to attempt to re-run setup with recommended settings. I agreed, and the software began to install. Yay! No more having to fiddle with compatibility settings.
There is still alot to be seen with the Corporate and Ultimate versions, and other than the security updates and the MAC looking interface. I have yet to see anything that might compel us to begin recommending updates to the new O/S. I will be more interested to see Microsoft's new partition imaging tool and thier strategy for doing mass rollouts. In the past we have been limited on what we could do with remote unattended installations, and being able to update these images in a timely fashion.
So far we are still un-decided on our position, but I'm sure inevitably we will begin our migration to the new system. So far though Vista gets a 5 of 10 from us.
~Mr. Network
I think prompting the user is the best compromise. M$ is saying that they will tweak the amount of promting so it won't be overwelming for the consumer. Yeah... lets hope so. Currently it is too much.
Curt
See this way they get to shift the blame on someone else, and not have to be concerned about security.
Pure genius!
"Come up with something better."
You act like that's an easy task. Chances are, they could go years without creating something remotely liked by users (I found maybe 2 XP themes that would appeal to most people I know).
By copying Apple, they are doing the two things they have done for years, and will (probably) continue to do for years:
1)Make a profit. Copycats or not, they are the biggest kid on the block, and will keep that position at any cost.
2)Look out for consumers. Now, before you go on the whole "lack of security/crashing" crusade, hear me out.
I'm not referring to the computer being fully functional 100% of the time. I'm just talking about making it easier to use for new computer users while maintaining the interest of more advanced users. XP did this exponentially better than the previous Windows iterations, and Vista may be able to pander to both sides even better.
And if it takes a copy of Mac products for them to do it, then why shouldn't they go for it?
Ya know, Apple didn't invent the mouse, yet they chose to include one with their computer. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. Sure, others have come along and improved on it, but it's still a mouse.
It's a BETA, people. Be glad you get to play with anything at all. It's not like you get given a Corvette free to play with for months before it's ready to be put out for sale. Complaining that it doesn't do this or that right is just plain silly.
market with killer products. And they also know that M$ has
copied the MAC interface for years, and probably will in the future
as is shown by Vista. But what people don't realize is that M$ is so
bad they can't even copy well...which has been proven time and
again, and will probably be proven with Vista. I predict Vista will be
the final straw for M$, and they will be forced to open source 'doze
to get it working and compete w/Linux.
"Come up with something better."
You act like that's an easy task. Chances are, they could go years without creating something remotely liked by users (I found maybe 2 XP themes that would appeal to most people I know).
By copying Apple, they are doing the two things they have done for years, and will (probably) continue to do for years:
1)Make a profit. Copycats or not, they are the biggest kid on the block, and will keep that position at any cost.
2)Look out for consumers. Now, before you go on the whole "lack of security/crashing" crusade, hear me out.
I'm not referring to the computer being fully functional 100% of the time. I'm just talking about making it easier to use for new computer users while maintaining the interest of more advanced users. XP did this exponentially better than the previous Windows iterations, and Vista may be able to pander to both sides even better.
And if it takes a copy of Mac products for them to do it, then why shouldn't they go for it?
Ya know, Apple didn't invent the mouse, yet they chose to include one with their computer. That isn't necessarily a bad thing. Sure, others have come along and improved on it, but it's still a mouse.
It's a BETA, people. Be glad you get to play with anything at all. It's not like you get given a Corvette free to play with for months before it's ready to be put out for sale. Complaining that it doesn't do this or that right is just plain silly.
market with killer products. And they also know that M$ has
copied the MAC interface for years, and probably will in the future
as is shown by Vista. But what people don't realize is that M$ is so
bad they can't even copy well...which has been proven time and
again, and will probably be proven with Vista. I predict Vista will be
the final straw for M$, and they will be forced to open source 'doze
to get it working and compete w/Linux.
http://zxo.blogspot.com/2006/05/windows-vista-beta-2-sucks.html
Look at how many features have been pulled. The vaporous file system is a prime example. It has been in development since 1996, and if it comes out by 2008, it will be a miracle. Meanwhile, the features of this file system have been available to *nix users for at least 15 years. MS innovation in action.
http://zxo.blogspot.com/2006/05/windows-vista-beta-2-sucks.html
Look at how many features have been pulled. The vaporous file system is a prime example. It has been in development since 1996, and if it comes out by 2008, it will be a miracle. Meanwhile, the features of this file system have been available to *nix users for at least 15 years. MS innovation in action.
- I can't even get in at all
- by Tokimemofan June 8, 2006 10:19 AM PDT
- stupid download servers
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 4 pages (244 Comments)