- Related Blogs
-
Inside CNET Labs: Windows Vista SP1 performance
February 13, 2008 -
Vista SP1 coming sooner for some
February 11, 2008 -
Vista SP1, Windows Server 2008 finalized
February 4, 2008
Servicing stack update KB937287, released last week, contained updates to Windows Vista installation software, and was billed as being "necessary to successfully install and to remove Windows Vista SP1 (Service Pack 1) on all versions of Windows Vista."
Microsoft stopped distributing the update on Wednesday, according to a blog post by Microsoft product manager Nick White.
"We've heard a few reports about problems customers may be experiencing as a result of KB937287," wrote White. "Immediately after receiving reports of this error, we made the decision to temporarily suspend automatic distribution of the update to avoid further customer impact while we investigate possible causes."
Vista SP1 is already available to subscribers to the Microsoft Developer Network but won't receive a formal public release until mid-March.
One irate Windows Vista Ultimate user replied to White's blog post, saying the prerequisite had corrupted a PC and resulted in the need to reformat the hard drive, with the resulting loss of all of the files and programs. When advised by an anonymous contributor of the System Restore option on the Vista installation disc, the Vista Ultimate user replied that the copy of Vista had been purchased and downloaded from the Internet, so there was no disc.
Two users complained that Windows Update prompted them to install the prerequisite, even after they had installed it.
Another user, S Marusic, wrote: "New Dell Inspiron PC stuck on the update loop as well. Any ETA from Microsoft on when/how to fix it? My client has valuable data that I need to consider stripping off the (hard drive) unless a patch/fix comes out soon...Help!"
According to Microsoft's White: "This problem only affects a small number of customers in unique circumstances."
Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.
See more CNET content tagged:
Microsoft Windows Vista,
Microsoft Corp.,
blog,
hard drive,
Microsoft Windows







Looking forward to SP1 just to see if my luck continues...
Perchance even an OS with a graphical display? That would
resolve the inaccessibility issue.
I can't say I have noticed any difference, but then I didn't have any problems with Vista before SP1.
I am very pleased with Vista.
What is behind Microsoft's logic? More important: is there a logic? Why does the #1 software company keep putting systems on the market to pull them
immediately after?
Would you accept such a lack of professionalism from a car manufacturer, a house builder or a service company? Of course, not.
Isn't it time for people to switch to a safer, & more reliable Operating System? How about we send a message to Microsoft? How about we stop being prisoner of a company who clearly does not care about the end user? How about next time we purchase a computer?
Apple releases great OS's and addresses some rare issues on the spot. Linux - due to its nature - do the same. How about you give these guys a try? You will not regret it.
Although I do agree that Mac is a great operating system, not many really good games are out for it and being a gamer, I'd naturally lean toward windows because most games I play run on Windows. If I were to begin editing videos and multimedia then I might consider using a Mac.
Sounds ridiculous doesn't it?
Besides, you don't count. You have someone come to your cubicle in the Office of Mindless MS Shills to install that bloatware.
From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/unique ... "5. not typical; unusual".
Vista users are in the minority of Windows users. They are not typical and are therefore, "unique" - just as Linux users and Mac users are "unique".
The very fact that MS have pulled this update shows that it DOES have serious issues that should have been forseen.
Apple doesn't have as many problems because they break compatability every couple of years. Microsoft tries to at least do a somewhat reasonable job of making sure older apps can run.
I still have apps written for Windows 95 that run on Vista, can a Apple Mac app from 95 run on Leopard???
Microsoft has been ignoring it and at it detriment.
Why Mr. Howard remains at a company that never pays attention to security is a mystery. Too much Kool-Aid I suspect.
No. The only thing SP1 changed, was to report the amount of RAM installed in your computer, NOT the amount that Vista can actually use, which is always less than 4GB on a 32-bit installation. See: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946003/ for more information. In short, nothing changed, except the system information display.
Note that this isn't a Windows limitation, any 32-bit OS will have the same issue.
I've used machines that are comparable both on Vista X86 with Premium edition and Ultimate edition as well as with XP pro all with almost identical hardware. My computer out-performs them all (yes, including the Xp version due to XP's very poor support of quad-processing management). As for poor reviews on Vista, everyone who doesn't like dinner is going to gripe about it. You'll be lucky in a group of 100 people eating the same food if more than 1 or 2 of those people will enjoy the food and actually be forthright in telling others it was good and reccommend it.
live onecare. It doesn't look like the beta. I'm guess it's out now?
I'm tired of all the annoyances from this joke MS calls an operating system.
With me, after this, I can not install more than 1 update at a time or the windows update crashes. And even with one at a time, I have to re-start in safe mode before booting normal again.
Enough for me.
http://www.ubuntu.com/
SP1 went on silky smooth without a hitch.
- lol
-
by Technologist72
February 21, 2008 8:19 AM PST
- And we KNOW "OpenSuse" has no bugs either, right!?
-
Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (106 Comments)Look at their install forum for a long list of installation woes: http://www.suseforums.net/index.php?s=9afb01e00ad15e008c658d9ea1d44f26&showforum=20
lol.