The European Union ruled on Wednesday that Microsoft must make Windows Server protocols available for license, but competitors showed little initial interest in the program.
The European Court of First Instance said Microsoft must comply with penalties imposed in March by the European Commission, which determined that Microsoft used its monopoly in operating systems to manipulate the markets for media players and work group server operating systems. Microsoft is still appealing the case and will pursue a possible settlement.
Microsoft will have to release a version of Windows without the Windows media software and to make certain protocols of its Windows Server operating system available to competitors. The intent is to level the playing field for competitors in both markets.
The EU ruling will force Microsoft to disclose more technical information than it has in the past, specifically dealing with Windows Server, said Brad Smith, a senior vice president and general counsel at Microsoft. The company intends to create a Web site with the technical details, fees and terms for the new server protocols, Smith said.
"The Commission's decision also covers a new category of communications protocols," Smith told reporters Wednesday. "Under the Commission's decision, we are obligated to make those protocols available for license so that they can be implemented in competing server software."
In the U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust case against Microsoft, the software giant was compelled to publish some Windows client protocols that allow desktop PCs to communicate with servers. About 20 companies, including Sun Microsystems and AOL, already participate in the existing licensing program, which is called Microsoft Communications Protocol Program.
The European Commission had ordered Microsoft to license protocols that deal with, among other tasks, sharing files stored on servers, sharing printers and authenticating a user's access to a network.
Some Microsoft competitors said they will investigate the new set of protocols, but any decision regarding licensing would require more time.
Novell, which owns its distribution of Linux and the NetWare operating systems, lauded the decision to enforce the ruling.
"Novell has been clear that we were very interested in seeing the remedy implemented, and we believe that it could be beneficial to players in the work group server market, including Novell," a company spokesman said.
As UC Berkeley students, the co-founders of "Back to the Roots" discovered they could grow mushrooms using recycled coffee grounds. Now their mushroom kit sells at grocery stores across the country.
Tommy Jordan, the man who shot his daughter's laptop for YouTube, gets a visit from police and child protection services. Oh, and Good Morning America.
For people who don't have time to tend a Zen garden, the Zen Table will handle the work for you. The table is filled with silicone beads and a robotic system that "rakes" images into the sand.
The Washington State Senate passed a bill that would charge electric car owners $100 per year to compensate for not paying gas taxes. The bill still has to pass the House.
Who would be willing to pay through the nose for the most unsecure software around?
This is not news.
However, since over 90% of the market is paying for Windows when free alternatives exist, your inferred anti-MS slam is somewhat watered-down.
Assuming nobody wants to license the technology, as you suggest, then the ruling is clearly pointless. Wouldn't you agree?