To meet its deadline of 2006 for the ambitious revision of Windows, Microsoft has lopped off one key element, the WinFS file system, and is making changes to others. But the operating system won't lack for features, executives say. Developers, meanwhile, are of two minds about the changes.

Microsoft's efforts to close windows of vulnerability
At CeBit America in New York, Microsoft's Greg Sullivan tells ZDNet's David Berlind that while SP2 is a security improvement for Windows, it's just the first step in a continual fight against network threats.
![]()

Gates: Some 'holy grails' to be found within decade
At the Gartner Symposium ITExpo in San Diego, Microsoft's Bill Gates discusses how innovations such as reliable speech recognition software will succeed in the next 10 years.
![]()

Ready to install SP2?
Problems, delays dominate headlines; CNET expert offers advice for home users.
![]()

Ballmer unveils Windows Server 2003
Microsoft is taking aim at Unix servers with the launch of its new Windows Server 2003. CEO Steve Ballmer appealed to IT managers, saying this is the right product for enterprises on tight budgets.
![]()
- Are delays such a bad thing?
- by matted September 23, 2004 5:30 AM PDT
- Why is it that everybody seems to be b*tching about Longhorn being delayed? Would you rather be continually milked for more money every year by having Microsoft release small updates disguised as new operating systems.<br /><br />This is what I feel Office has become, 2003 had the look, but really wasn't all that different to XP (although I'm not sure what else they could add to the feature set anyway).<br /><br />Microsoft can't seem to get anything right in the eyes of some. People complain because MS aren't releasing operating systems fast enough, yet they also complain because MS keeps forcing people to pay money to upgrade to new OS's.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(4 Comments)