Microsoft is readying the final version of Forefront Client Security, its long-awaited product to protect business computers against malicious code attacks.
Forefront Client Security is designed to shield PCs and servers from threats such as spyware, viruses and rootkits. Microsoft announced the software in October 2005 and an early trial version has been available for about five months. The final release is due in coming weeks, Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer said Monday.
"Our client product is shipping in the next month or so. It really does do hygiene, security, antivirus, all the way down to the client level," Ballmer said during a presentation in the Netherlands, a video of which was made available by Webwereld, a Dutch technology news Web site.
Microsoft is ramping up its efforts to convince businesses that it's the solution to, and not the source of, their security woes. Forefront Client Security will go up against security software from established players including Cisco Systems, Symantec and McAfee. Microsoft unveiled Forefront as a single security brand for businesses in June.
"This is a major investment for us," Ballmer said. "It is a very serious investment for us. We know if you choose to adopt these products, they instantaneously become mission-critical in your environment."
Ballmer spoke Monday at an event near Amsterdam called "You're in Control." The event focused on Microsoft's security and management products. Ballmer highlighted System Center as the brand for Microsoft's management software and gave an overview of the products and upcoming releases.
"We will continue to extend our management product line. We try to focus on being simple, integrated and comprehensive all at the same time," Ballmer said.
For smaller organizations, Microsoft is readying the release of System Center Essentials. These tools have a "little less capability, a lot more ease of use and a little lower price" than the enterprise System Center products, Ballmer said. System Center Essentials is due by the end of June, according to Microsoft's Web site.
For enterprise users, Microsoft plans to ship System Center Virtual Machine Manager later this year and is working on System Center Service Manager, a help desk product that is "nine months or more away," Ballmer said.
Microsoft also has renamed its Microsoft Operations Manager, or MOM, service-monitoring product to System Center Operations Manager, and its Systems Management Server, or SMS, change and configuration management software to System Center Configuration Manager. System Center Data Protection Manager, a backup and recovery tool, rounds out the current System Center family aimed at enterprises.
Presentations similar to those at the Netherlands event are scheduled around the world, including one on May 2 in Beverly Hills, Calif., where Microsoft has said it will make launch announcements around its Forefront and System Center products.
The adaptation of VMS to the Intel architecture, which was Windows NT, had not security built into the design. When W.NT 3.5 was made pretty and musical into W.NT 4.0 only end-user appeal was considered. Security should be in the original design, it cannot be added afterwards. All the other OSs in the lineage suffer from the same defficiency: Windows 2000, XP and Vista. Now MS is selling security as patches, having violated principles of software engineering.
The analogy is designing a big, beautiful house with unsafe hidden parts, such as the foundation and the upper parts, making them not strong enough to counter gravity forces. Now they are selling add-on reinforcement patches at a significant cost. Problem is that the original blueprint has been already so much patched, that there is no way to find all the compromised parts of the current structure. Chances are they may ignore a potential failure that will allow the whole thing to collapse. It is better get out before disaster strikes.
Yeah, MS is not the cause of 99.9% of the worlds viruses and spyware.
Just like people are idiots for falling for the "one care" protection racket, companies would have to be even more idiotic to fork out more money for the company responsible for the swiss cheese in the first place.
Google creates an animated doodle that features a boy, a girl, Google's search engine, and a jump rope. But might there be darker, more analytical, more troubling interpretations to this tale?
When the sun goes down, that's when the iPad gets busy for folks with news readers. The iPhone? It's more of a daytime habit. If you're building an app for both devices, heed the lesson.
EnerG2 opens a plant to make an engineered carbon that will improve performance of energy storage devices and make storage for start-stop hybrid cars less expensive.
The analogy is designing a big, beautiful house with unsafe hidden parts, such as the foundation and the upper parts, making them not strong enough to counter gravity forces. Now they are selling add-on reinforcement patches at a significant cost. Problem is that the original blueprint has been already so much patched, that there is no way to find all the compromised parts of the current structure. Chances are they may ignore a potential failure that will allow the whole thing to collapse. It is better get out before disaster strikes.
Just like people are idiots for falling for the "one care" protection racket, companies would have to be even more idiotic to fork out more money for the company responsible for the swiss cheese in the first place.
It's a cya for this:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/computersecurity/2007-04-22-cyberspies-microsoft-office_N.htm" target="_newWindow">http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/computersecurity/2007-04-22-cyberspies-microsoft-office_N.htm</a>
And will be just as good as Microsoft Windows Defender, the one you know that came in dead last?
We first buy the OS and after its security... I knew Microsoft had a
plan to make Vista more secure.