April 25, 2005 8:53 AM PDT
Microsoft, Oracle call for patent reform
- Related Stories
Graphics patent suit fires back at MicrosoftApril 22, 2005
Sun gets second Microsoft patent paymentApril 14, 2005
Microsoft: Patent overhaul needed nowMarch 11, 2005
Appeals court revisits Eolas decisionMarch 2, 2005
Open-source honchos trash software patentsFebruary 1, 2005
How to fight against patent terrorismJanuary 6, 2005
Microsoft wants patent law rewritten to make it easier to challenge patents after they're granted and to curb what it views as "abusive litigation," said Brad Smith, the software company's general counsel.
"We need that system to continue in a healthy way," Smith said at a weekend conference here organized by the Association for Competitive Technology. "We need to ensure that high-quality patents are approved and low-quality patents are not."
Smith's comments, directed at the dozens of congressional staffers in the audience, represented Microsoft's latest critique of a patent system that has caused it to spend $100 million a year defending itself against 35 to 40 lawsuits at any one time. Microsoft has gone on the legislative offensive after a jury awarded Eolas Technologies $565 million in damages--which has been partially reversed--in a patent dispute over Internet Explorer.
Congress is listening. The Senate Judiciary committee is meeting Monday to consider patent reform legislation. Among those scheduled to testify: Segway inventor Dean Kamen, and lawyers for Intel and Micron Technologies. Meanwhile, the European Parliament is debating whether to permit U.S.-style software patents, a move that's opposed by free software advocates.
Smith's comments found support from Sanjay Prasad, Oracle's chief patent counsel.
He said that courts have been awarding damages for infringement that are out of line with the patent's real value. "No reasonable business person would ever agree to" pay those sums in licensing fees, Prasad said at the ACT conference on Saturday. "There's a large distortion between the value provided realistically, and how that comes out in court."
The influential U.S. Chamber of Commerce is backing patent reform. Post-grant review and opposition "creates another filter through which bad patents can be challenged," said Brad Huther, the former president of the International Intellectual Property Institute who's now directing the chamber's intellectual property efforts.
But Huther warned that Congress may not act swiftly. "This is not a problem that's going to be solved in a matter of years."
6 commentsJoin the conversation! Add your comment