- Related Stories
-
Piecing together Windows Vista
November 8, 2006 -
Microsoft delays Office 2007 again
June 29, 2006 -
Microsoft puts Office preview online
June 26, 2006
Consumers who download the 2007 Microsoft Office system Beta 2 will be charged $1.50 per download, beginning next Wednesday at 6 p.m. PDT, a Microsoft representative said.
"Since the end of May, Beta 2 has been downloaded more than 3 million times...That's 500 percent more than what was expected," the representative said. "The fee helps offset the cost of downloading from the servers."
Although Microsoft's Information Worker Product Management Group decided to initiate a fee for new users of Beta 2, the "technical refresh," or update, for current users of the software will remain free, the representative said.
Those who want to test drive Beta 2 to see how it works can access the software for free. But if they want to test it against their internal systems, a download or the CD is required.
The fee marks the first time Microsoft has charged for a download version of an Office beta, the representative said, noting that customers have long had to pay the shipping and handling costs for CD versions of betas.
See more CNET content tagged:
fee, representative, Microsoft Office, Microsoft Corp., CD






Microsoft's money until the cows come home in order to
outspend Apple - all in the name of winning the portable media
player crown.
This article quotes a Microsoft representative claiming that the
$1.50/download of Office is being done to defray costs.
Even better - neither of your completely non-critical articles
says anything about Microsoft's prior predatory business
practices or their willingness to use their massive Office and
Windows-funded piggy bank as a resource for beating up on the
superior competition.
Along with yesterday's press-release rewrite - uh, I mean blog
post about how wonderful Intel's core 2 Duo is, is there anything
News.com can be critical about except for Apple?
I think the answer has a lot to do with who buys ad space on
your web site.
And they're just SO strapped for cash, aren't they?
that the company is worth and that this is just MS's way of sticking
it to the guy that just wants to see if they want to fork over
$200-300 bucks for the real version?.
A $1.50, what the hell does that cover? I guess if you add it
together its a couple of cups of Starbucks in the morning for Mr.
Gates and his cronies. Or maybe its offset the costs of MSNTV, we
all know how well that turned out. Expect more of the same.
lol
If you are laughing as hard as I am right about now, don't think that I am kidding.
software. They can't even make their OS secure and virus free.
150,000 viruses and counting. I wonder how many bad lines of
code in Vista and Office. I think Microsoft should be broken up.
Ballmer is out of his cotten picking mind to charge for beta
software, but I guess there are idiots out there that will pay for it.
product is buying a beta.
I can't believe a company would charge someone to beta test their software.
Shouldn't that be the other way around? If these people are in effect doing work for MS, then shouldn't MS pay THEM?
Seems to me MS should pay everyone who downloads and tests their beta software $1.50.
Talk about suckers....
Merg
lose over the next 5 years on Zune! Why should they pay for their
stupidity when consumers and investors can?
People who like to beta test and have the know how wont mind as much paying money to see a sneak preview and use and influence its release.
2.83b $ profit just not enough any more?
had elements of flip3d in it. I just love that gimmicky Vista eye
candy stuff, even down to the name.
Say it with me. Flliiiiippp Thhhreeeeee DEeeeeeee!
Now who doesn't thinks thats cool?
Office 2007 Beta clearly states that it will no longer or have limited function after February 2007 (or at least that is what it says on the CD of it I got with my PC World magazine).
Jeeze, I would suggest anyone who wants to try the Beta version get the magazine. At least you get a good read along with it.
If on top that, knowing the security issues of MS Office Products you feel is worth it to install it in your machine, the small fee is nothing compared to what the risk of using it can cost you.
What a bunch of nonsense. I have been using Intel machines since the pre-windows days of DOS, and have never had any of those. As for WinXT itself, it just works... :-)
If the people who are running the office Beta was given 500 million to do this, and it costs 600 million, it wont hurt microsofts bottom line very much, but whoever is in charge might not have a job as long.
Each Division/Project will have a budget, to insure maximum profitablity for the company, overall you wont notice money being drained out of 13 billion dollars in profit, but the way you make it so high is by not letting everyone leak a little bit of money.
near a "bad" product, but it would be nice to see some more
competition. As much as I'd >LOVE< to see Open Office there,
from what I've seen when using it (got it right here on my Mac),
it just doesn't seem to be there yet. Will it be? I certainly hope it
will - and soon!
And heck, if Open Office is suited well for your needs, then
there's no question it would be ridiculous to pay God knows how
much for Microsoft Office.
I will say that this is pretty petty of them, to charge for Office
Beta downloads.
Charles R. Whealton
Charles Whealton @ pleasedontspam.com
- Tut Tut
- by Alex Todd July 30, 2006 10:55 PM PDT
- The public has to pay to test Microsoft's software and report back any errors !!!!
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (60 Comments)How about they pay us $1.50 each time outlook 2007 crashes and Drwatson sends a report back to them.
Why cant they use bit torrent to distribute their flaky software ;) that we are making better for THEM.