March 29, 2007 1:33 AM PDT

Mercury in eco-friendly lightbulbs raises fears

Mercury in eco-friendly lightbulbs raises fears
Related Stories

Green tech powers forward

January 16, 2008

City tries to cut energy bills with LEDs

February 12, 2007

Cheaper LEDs to light a green path?

January 19, 2007

Tripping the lights organic

September 5, 2006

Government, manufacturers and environmentalists urge recycling programs for compact fluorescent bulbs, which contain dangerous mercury and are rapidly growing in popularity.

The story "Mercury in eco-friendly lightbulbs raises fears" published March 29, 2007 at 1:33 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.

5 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
How about LED lights?
I have CFL "bulbs" but I really don't like buying them because of the mercury. I won't be replacing CFLs with CFLs when they finally go dim and die.

I am thinking about using LED units instead.

One source:
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.theledlight.com/120-VAC-LEDbulbs.html" target="_newWindow">http://www.theledlight.com/120-VAC-LEDbulbs.html</a>

I don't think they have any Hg content though I suppose there is *something* nasty that would result from using them. I just don't know what it is.
Posted by fmcgowan (43 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Ntohing nasty
They are very simple organic diodes nothing complicated.
Posted by Blito (435 comments )
Link Flag
More mercury from incandescent than CFL
The biggest source of mercury in our world is from coal fired power plants, and 50% of the power in the US comes from coal. If a CFL light manages to live for 5 years (very possible, most are rated for 7-10 years though rarely last quite that long) then the mercury from the coal plants for the extra energy consumed by incandescent bulbs will exceed the mercury content of a CFL.

I'm not saying that we shouldn't worry about the mercury at all, indeed we should definitely recycle ALL CFL bulbs and try to reduce the mercury use when possible. However even in this regard they are still better then incandescent bulbs.
Posted by Hoser McMoose (182 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Just Toss Them In The Trash
That's what I do... Flame me. I don't care...

It makes no difference either way what you do for led's will take over cf in time..
Posted by SiXiam (69 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Nothing will be done
The last time we had an issue similar to this it was household smoke detectors: these devices contain minute amounts of radioactive material and need to be disposed of properly (don't believe me? read the tag on the back of yours). Government and industry did nothing to educate people about this and I would guess that 99.9% of them are being disposed of improperly. Expect it to happen again with compact fluorescent bulbs.

The silver lining is that compact fluorescent will be a short-lived interim technology if LED development can increase LED brightness. But the mercury from the CF bulbs, like the radioactive material from the smoke detectors, will kill something or somebody somewhere over time. Please consider that and make the small effort to dispose of them as best you can...
Posted by Razzl (1317 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

Inside CNET News

1-2 of 12

Scroll Left Scroll Right

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 12,801.23
S&P 500 (0.00%) 0.00 1,342.64
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 2,903.88
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 2,032.01
  Symbol Lookup