June 2, 2005 4:05 PM PDT

MPAA files new round of swap suits

Hollywood studios filed a new round of lawsuits Thursday against individuals accused of trading copyrighted movies online.

This is the Motion Picture Association of America's fifth round of suits against individual file-swappers, but the group has not provided details about the number or location of people targeted.

4 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
Have ANY of these suites gone to court?
Have we seen ANY of these cases go to trial? I'm very curious to know what happens to those defendants who refuse to settle. I'd like to read the transcripts of the cases. When suing college students with no financial resourses, how does the RIAA get blood from a stone?
Posted by Willie Winkie (107 comments )
Reply Link Flag
sooner or later
These lawsuits are still very new, so in order for someone to have gone to trial alredy, they would have been one of the first ones sued in late 2003, but I'm pretty sure all of these early people settled. And with a good reason too - they got a big break compared with maximum civil judgments in the several $100K's.

Shoudl the RIAA win, they will sell the judgment to a collection agency. That will (a) ruin def's credit rating, (b) get the money from you one way or another, especially since it's harder to declare bankrupcy. Have you ever had a health insurance company dispute? It happens more and more nowadays, where the insurance company refuses to pay out, then the hospital turns you over to collection, and the fun really begins. Now multiply it a hundred times over.
Posted by sanenazok (2950 comments )
Link Flag
Have ANY of these suites gone to court?
Have we seen ANY of these cases go to trial? I'm very curious to know what happens to those defendants who refuse to settle. I'd like to read the transcripts of the cases. When suing college students with no financial resourses, how does the RIAA get blood from a stone?
Posted by Willie Winkie (107 comments )
Reply Link Flag
sooner or later
These lawsuits are still very new, so in order for someone to have gone to trial alredy, they would have been one of the first ones sued in late 2003, but I'm pretty sure all of these early people settled. And with a good reason too - they got a big break compared with maximum civil judgments in the several $100K's.

Shoudl the RIAA win, they will sell the judgment to a collection agency. That will (a) ruin def's credit rating, (b) get the money from you one way or another, especially since it's harder to declare bankrupcy. Have you ever had a health insurance company dispute? It happens more and more nowadays, where the insurance company refuses to pay out, then the hospital turns you over to collection, and the fun really begins. Now multiply it a hundred times over.
Posted by sanenazok (2950 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

Inside CNET News

1-2 of 12

Scroll Left Scroll Right

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.57%) 72.81 12,874.04
S&P 500 (0.64%) 8.65 1,351.29
NASDAQ (0.87%) 25.34 2,929.22
CNET TECH (0.79%) 15.96 2,047.98
  Symbol Lookup