August 7, 2006 4:00 AM PDT

Leopard, Power Macs expected at Apple confab

When Apple Computer CEO Steve Jobs takes the stage Monday for his Worldwide Developers Conference keynote, it'll be hard for him to top last year's performance.

At that time, Jobs captivated the computer industry with his announcement that Apple was switching to Intel processors--when he confirmed reports of the historic change, gasps filled San Francisco's Moscone Center. This year isn't shaping up to be quite so dramatic, but with Apple and Jobs, one never knows.

WWDC

A few things are expected from most Apple watchers: a preview of the latest version of Mac OS X, which Apple itself said would be coming, and new hardware based on Intel's Core 2 Duo chips. Apple has yet to take its Power Mac desktop to the Intel processors, and it's expected to unveil those powerful systems.

Apple has not said much about Leopard, the next-generation release of Mac OS X. The company announced the name at last year's confab and said then that it would be available late this year or early next year.

Apple has been on a fairly rapid release cycle, producing four updates to Mac OS X since 2001. In that time, Microsoft has released just one major version of Windows--Windows XP, though the company did come out with its Tablet and Media Center flavors as well as the security-oriented Service Pack 2.

In May 2004, Avie Tevanian, who was then Apple Chief Software Technology Officer, said the company would slow its pace of OS releases. Apple last updated the OS with Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger in April 2005.

One feature that Apple has already said will be present in Leopard is a production version of its Boot Camp software, which lets users of Intel-based Macs boot Windows as well as Mac OS X. In addition to Boot Camp, some have also wondered whether Apple might build virtualization technology similar to Parallels into Leopard, enabling the Mac OS and Windows to run side-by-side or perhaps letting Windows programs run under the Mac OS itself. Apple has not commented specifically, but it has started touting Parallels software in some marketing for the Mac and also carries its software in Apple retail stores.

It's not clear what other features the new OS might have, but Jobs is expected to walk the audience through some of the highlights. Before the show's kickoff, banners were visible through the windows of Moscone Center, featuring Apple's slogan for this year's conference, "You've come to the right platform," and icons of various features within Mac OS X, such as Spotlight, Automator and the Quicktime media software, all of which could be due for an upgrade. A Flickr posting of one photo had helpful (and humorous) notes explaining the significance of the icons.

Apple developers may well get their hands on a preview version of the OS at the conference. Apple has done that with past Mac OS updates, and the company is said to have posted a page on its developer site that made reference to a "Leopard Preview," though that page is no longer on Apple's site.

On the hardware side, with Intel's Core 2 Duo desktop processors making their way out into the wild, it's likely Apple will complete the transition to Intel's chips in front of its developers. Apple was absent from Intel's Core 2 Duo launch event a few weeks ago, during which dozens of PC companies touted new systems based on the chips.

Many Apple watchers also think the company will announce plans to move the MacBook Pro to the notebook version of the Core 2 Duo, code-named Merom. The Merom chips will start appearing in August, with the first systems expected to ship toward the end of the month.

What's less certain is whether Jobs will use the stage to introduce new iPod models or announce new features related to iTunes. The WWDC conference tends to be more about the Mac than Apple's thriving music businesses, Shaw Wu, an analyst with American Technology Research, said in a note distributed last week. But with Apple, there's almost always "one more thing...."

One area Jobs probably won't address is the company's involvement in the stock-options backdating scandal sweeping Silicon Valley. On Thursday, Apple announced that it would probably have to restate several years worth of earnings after the results of an investigation into its option practices.

See more CNET content tagged:
Steve Jobs, Moscone Center, Intel Core 2 Duo, Apple Computer, Apple Mac OS

16 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Jobs should come clean on the stock options issue
Reports now suggest Apple may have to restate its results going
back as long as four years. They need to say what they've done
to identify the employees responsible and whether those people
are still with the company.
Posted by Jackson Cracker (272 comments )
Reply Link Flag
While I agree
While I agree with you, a developer's conference is the wrong place.
Posted by SeaMoose77 (14 comments )
Link Flag
Jobs is coming clean.....
His own stock options were cancelled long ago without being
exercised and with no personal gain to Jobs. Apple is recomputing
it's financial reports based upon new SEC requirements. Remember,
Apple blew the whistle on it's own problem long before anyone else
did.

I suggest that your 'complaint' shows a serious lack of
understanding of the problem and the solutions.
Posted by Earl Benser (4310 comments )
Link Flag
Along with 79 other companies...
Apple is fine, what they did was perfectly legal, but now the SEC has changed some rules, so Apple along with 79 other companies (so far) have to update some accounting. Not a big deal at all.

Please read up on the subject before you post again.
Posted by OS11 (844 comments )
Link Flag
G6 Power Mac ?
I wonder what CPU they end up using on the G6 Power Mac, or is it going to even be called that ?

Anyone have a clue ?
Posted by rmiecznik (224 comments )
Reply Link Flag
the new power mac will be called Mac pro
mac pro and forget about G5 or G6; it looks like apple is launching
new exciting products. My especulation is based on the fact the
apple store is closed for updates.
Posted by likimikix (8 comments )
Link Flag
Why??
Why would it be called G6 if it's not using a 6th generation PPC processor?
Posted by nmcphers (261 comments )
Link Flag
iPods on WWDC?
Are we gonna have games in the iPods?
Posted by rleon (111 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Apple has said that it will not do virtualization
> In addition to Boot Camp, some have also wondered whether Apple might build
> virtualization technology similar to Parallels into Leopard, enabling the Mac OS
> and Windows to run side-by-side or perhaps letting Windows programs run under
> the Mac OS itself. Apple has not commented specifically, but it has started
> touting Parallels software in some marketing for the Mac and also carries its
> software in Apple retail stores.

Actually Apple has commented on this.

Phil Schiller was asked:

‘will Apple include a virtualization solution in [the next version of Mac OS X] Leopard.’ He said ‘absolutely not, the R&D would be prohibitive and we’re not going to do it. Our solution is dual boot.’

source: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/07/07/windowsmac/index.php" target="_newWindow">http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/07/07/windowsmac/index.php</a>

Now I wouldn't be too surprised if Apple bought Parallels, but I don't think they'll do that either.
Posted by luomat (39 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Well...
Apple also said it will stick with IBM for chips.

Things can change, nothing is concrete.
Posted by airwalkery2k (117 comments )
Link Flag
Re: Well...
And when did they say that? 3 years ago or more?

I'm sure 3 or 4 years from now it wouldn't be as easy to hold them to their promise of no Virtualization software, because the reasons that prompted that stement is likely to change. Not so much so in a few months.
Posted by nmcphers (261 comments )
Link Flag
Jobs not involved in options problems
and so he does not need to explain or make excuses for himself.
Posted by Mehboob Alam (17 comments )
Reply Link Flag
ya true
Maybe they need to standalize their Power Machine names, so that no matter what hardware switch they make, people can follow the upgrades better.

That's all I was thinking.
Posted by rmiecznik (224 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.