September 12, 2006 6:54 AM PDT
Leak scandal costs HP's Dunn her chairman's job
- Related Stories
-
HP's boardroom drama
May 8, 2007
The board has appointed CEO and President Mark Hurd to take over for Dunn, who will continue to serve as chairman through the company's Jan. 18, 2007, scheduled meeting, the company announced early Tuesday. After that point, Dunn will remain on the board as a director.
In a statement, Hurd said, "I am taking action to ensure that inappropriate investigative techniques will not be employed again. They have no place in HP."
Hurd will continue to hold his positions of president and chief executive. In addition, HP said Richard Hackborn was named lead independent director, effective in January.
Also on Tuesday, HP announced that George Keyworth is resigning from the board, effective immediately. Dunn earlier this year had identified Keyworth as a source of media leaks.
Dunn's departure caps a tumultuous episode for HP, one of the country's largest companies and a Silicon Valley icon that just over a week ago had been basking in the glow of an economic turnaround. The computer maker now finds itself mired in a scandal sparked by an investigation into media leaks emanating from its boardroom.
Last Tuesday, several media outlets reported that an internal HP investigation into its own directors was behind one director's angry resignation this spring.
During the course of last week, it came out that the investigation to find the source of media leaks involved possibly illegal access to phone records of the company's directors, at least nine journalists and potentially many other people. As a result, federal and California state prosecutors launched investigations, and civil lawsuits and criminal charges are possible. A U.S. House of Representatives committee is also seeking records related to the case.
HP said in a statement on Tuesday that it will cooperate with the House subcommittee "and will provide the necessary facts and information."
Patricia Dunn
A top aide to the Senate Commerce Committee said on Tuesday that the panel would be pushing harder a floor vote on legislation that would increase penalties for telephone pretexting. That bill,
Kevin Martin, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, noted after the Senate hearing that the FCC last week sent a letter to AT&T asking for details about the HP case. "Making it illegal to sell (phone record information) would be helpful," Martin said.
Dunn, who ranked 17 on Forbes magazine's "100 Most Powerful Women" list in 2005, replaced Carly Fiorina as the chairman of the computing giant last year. Dunn had been a director at HP since 1998. She was co-chairman, chairman and chief executive officer of Barclays Global Investors from 1995 through 2002. According to a biography of Dunn on HP's Web site, she "also serves on the advisory board of the (University of California at) Berkeley Haas School of Business, as well as the conference board's Center for Corporate Governance."
Dunn had been frustrated by media leaks dating back to articles in early 2005 about the relationship between then-CEO Fiorina and the board. A Jan. 23, 2006, report by CNET News.com that quoted an unnamed source describing a strategy-planning meeting of the board apparently so angered Dunn that she authorized an investigation of her fellow directors to find the leak.
In a statement, Dunn said she was proud of her accomplishments at HP but regretted the use of "inappropriate techniques" in the investigation.
HP's boardroom drama
"These leaks had the potential to affect not only the stock price of HP but also that of other publicly traded companies," she said. "Unfortunately, the investigation, which was conducted with third parties, included certain inappropriate techniques. These went beyond what we understood them to be, and I apologize that they were employed."
Eric Ross, a financial analyst at ThinkEquity Partners, said replacing Dunn is a good move for the company, if only because the controversy may be demoralizing and distracting to employees.
But Hurd's accumulated power as president, CEO and soon chairman does raise questions of corporate governance, Ross said.
"Making Hurd chairman seems to be a lot of power for one person," he said. "It seems like the world's moving away from that model."
See more CNET content tagged:
Patricia Dunn, Mark Hurd, chairman, investigation, scandal
38 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
Instead, they hired a firm that they knew would do things like pretexting. These firms would be out of business if they didn't do that sort of thing. Hopefully, HP's board has enough business savy to know this which is why they were hired in the first place - thier brains and experience.
What didn't work for Kozlowski shouldn't work for Dunn: the "I'm incompetent" excuse. Either she's lying or she's stupid, and both of these should lead to REMOVAL from the HP Board.
How come Patricia Dunn isn't in the Top 10 yet?
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.whotohate.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.whotohate.com</a>
Hurd and Keyworth can be tomorrow's session.
Hurd and Keyworth can be tomorrow's session.
I am most disappointed in Mark Hurd's actions as I thought he was going to be great for HP. Now I find that he is only a lapdog to the board.
Therefore, I think HP will suffer considerable consumer backlash. I know it will from me. I've already started looking at Epson, Brother, and Canon products. I'm GONE.
HP: Invent? HP: Spy.
If even half of what she's been alleged of doing is true (and it certainly seems to be), HP's 'remedy' is rather shameful, to say the least.
I stopped buying HP for my company when Carly was buying Compaq. I had been thinking about buying from them again.....but not now! Stockholders should revolt and demand that she really loose her job.
couple of years. They have now successfully removed the two most
powerful women in the company from power.
Just an observation.
The two incompetent losers should have NEVER been hired in the first place.
Carly was a walking disaster area, she appointed so many retards to positions of power I am surprised HP is still in business. If there are any other losers hired by the disaster queen, they need to go as well.
Thankfully Dunn will still be on the board and a guiding force for HP's direction.
Maybe in the wake of this HP can create an Ethics branch and have Dunn lead it up to atone for her misgivings.
That sounds just comically farcical enough that HP would be dumb enough to do it.
Here's the icing on the cake: Dunn probably has a contract clause that gives her some massive multi-million dollar bonus for not having completed her tenure as chairman for HP.
Could high-level corporate antics stink any more than they do?
need to be fired today and brought up on charges tomorrow. Dunn
should already be out the door and no longer on the board, and if,
as it appears, the board of HP did not publicly reveal the illegal
activity the minute they learned of it, and if Perkins' allegations are
correct, they should all be sent to preside on the the board of the
local concrete country club. Period.
So which is better, having this information leaked to the press so investors can act on the information, or keeping it secret so insiders can trade on the information while keeping ordinary investors in the dark?
You're gonna have to try harder than "they took away my insider profits" to justify authorizing fraud, Ms. Dunn.
Cheney and Bush have direct, active ties to major corporations that receive huge no-contest government contracts.
Governement is quickly becoming the not-so-secret ***** of corporations and their money and it will only get worse because it's become an accepted, if not downright flaunted practice.
It's a corporate tool that usually works to the institutions advantage. Sometimes leaks can also help the public uncover wrong-doing.
It's just not black and white.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.iwantmyess.com/?p=95" target="_newWindow">http://www.iwantmyess.com/?p=95</a>
This should be a wake-up call to other top-level execs to start taking security seriously.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.teckmagazine.com/content/view/659/42/" target="_newWindow">http://www.teckmagazine.com/content/view/659/42/</a> is how many billions is she going to steal on the way out?
They need to fire her <beep> along with any other directors involved.
The board's actions have been more of the CYA variety than of truthfulness.
* WHAT PHONE RECORDS? The board played dumb when they realized that directors' phone records were used in the leak investigation. No one asked, "How did we get these records?"
* BOARD MEMBER RESIGNED FOR "PERSONAL REASONS": Perkins resigned in May. HP resisted proper reporting to the SEC of the reasons for Perkins' resignation until the past few days.
* STONEWALLING: Dunn and Hurd have made only weak apologies. Dunn has been far more strident about tracing the leaks from an individual than about the corporate breech of integrity in fraudulent investigations.
* PROTECTING CRIMINALS: HP has refused to identify the private investigation firm or the third party investigators who are suspected of doing the pretexting.
* WEAK APPEASEMENT: Recent announcement of Board changes are weak.
1. Dunn remains chair for 4 MONTHS.
2. She remains on the Board.
3. She will be replaced by Mark Hurd, who is also CEO and President.
4. The Board will backtracking on its new rule, that the Chair and CEO would be different people. This weakens HP's Corporate Governance.
If the Board had any integrity, it would have acted...
* immediately, upon learning of wrong doing
* without coverup, without excuses
* without compromise to the offenders
The Board must demand Dunn's resignation from the Board. (There will be more legal fallout for HP if she remains, than if she leaves and HP cooperates fully with the California State, Federal, Congressional, SEC and FBI investigations).
The Board needs to have a non-executive Chair. There needs to be a check on the CEO.
The Board must make a public statement, repudiating in the strongest terms, the tactics used by its private investigators, and reiterating its stand on corporate integrity.
The Board must take ACTION to convince the business and investment community that it is determined to regain the mantle of integrity and excellence it once had under Hewlett and Packard.
She should not be on the board at all...Dunn needs to do the right thing and resign NOW...
at least it will give her some credibility!