February 9, 2006 12:48 PM PST

Lawsuit challenges new 'e-annoyance' law

A new law targeting "annoying" e-mail messages and Web posts is being challenged in federal court.

The plaintiff, a Web site that lets people send anonymous e-mail for a fee, said the suit was necessary because the law is so broad it makes providing the service a crime.

A law meant to annoy?
FAQ: The new 'annoy' law explained
A practical guide to the new federal law that aims to outlaw certain types of annoying Web sites and e-mail.

"What we are seeking to do is have that portion of the statute declared unconstitutional," said Charles Mudd, an attorney in Chicago who's representing TheAnonymousEmail.com.

As reported earlier by CNET News.com, President Bush last month signed into law a massive bill for the Justice Department that includes the new criminal sanctions aimed at Internet communications that "annoy." The law prohibits anyone from posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing his or her true identity.

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

TheAnonymousEmail.com, operated by a privately held Scottsdale, Ariz., company called The Suggestion Box, offers the ability to send anonymous messages for a $19.95 subscription fee.

It's illegal to annoy

A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

Howard Baer, the company's president, said the new law is so problematic it could criminalize filing a complaint against a public corporation under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act--if, that is, executives claimed the complaint was intended to "annoy" them.

The challenge to the "annoy" law, filed in federal district court in Arizona, asks for a preliminary injunction barring federal prosecutors from enforcing the rule. It claims the law's invocation of the word "annoy" is "ambiguous, overbroad and vague" and violates the First Amendment and the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The law, called the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act, amends existing law dealing with telephone calls by extending new criminal sanctions to the Internet. Unlike other legislative proposals dealing with voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), the "annoy" restrictions apply broadly to any form of Internet communications, not just VoIP.

Eugene Volokh, a UCLA law professor who wrote a book on the First Amendment, has said the "annoy" law may violate Americans' free speech rights. "Though the desire to annoy may sometimes be petty...it shouldn't strip the speech of constitutional protection," Volokh said.

See more CNET content tagged:
law, First Amendment, identity, Arizona, VoIP


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Annoy me
That law annoys me. I want to know EXACTLY who wrote it, who
pushed it into law, who signed it, and who agrees with it.
Posted by ronjay (109 comments )
Reply Link Flag
E-Annoyance Bill
I have been recieving anonomous e-mails from the most disgusting made up names who represent "Health Suite". They are trying to sell me misspelled versions of Viagra and all those other wonderful sex drugs. One can not reply to the sender, as there is no real return address. I for one, am all for stopping these companies from thier ability to employ any old client to do thier hawking for them. No where on any of the "paperwork" does it allow for one to stop the email from coming into one's computer. You just get it day after day, hour after hour. Let the lawsuits begin! I can't wait to see them defend the position of not allowing email receipients the right to discontinue the spam them inundate my mailbox.
Posted by FitzRandy (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
I'm annoyed, too
I'm annoyed that Mr. Jon beat me to the punch with his so-obvious post and that Ms. Miller did not use her spell check. Lock them both up!!!
Posted by elibort (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.