Lawmaker blasts U.K. government on Microsoft policy

A member of Parliament of the United Kingdom has launched a stinging attack on the U.K. government's IT strategy, saying that it has given Microsoft too much control.

John Pugh, who is a member of Parliament, or MP, for Southport and a member of the Public Accounts Committee, was speaking in an adjournment debate on Tuesday that he had called. The aim of the debate, he said, was to explore the alternatives to using Microsoft software, including open source.

The current U.K. government strategy has left too much in the hands of Microsoft, Pugh argued, and he accused the company of "predatory pricing and stultifying competition."

He said that the U.K. government's policy "is, in part, in breach of European Union regulations" on competition.

The government's strategy hits the poorest hardest, Pugh said. "Why should people on benefits have to use Vista when it costs hundreds of pounds and there are cheaper open-source solutions available?" he asked. "Why should people have to use Vista rather than Apple, for that matter?"

Furthermore, the U.K. government has ceded control to Microsoft, Pugh said, pointing to Connecting for Health, a government health program as an example. "I am happy for Connecting for Health to go to a company like Microsoft," he said. "I am less happy when the details are subject to a confidentiality agreement."

Speaking for the U.K. government, Angela Eagle, MP for Wallasey, said that the government's strategy on IT was not governed by a desire to choose any particular vendor, but by the "need to get value and the best possible deal."

Eagle said that there were many benefits of open-source software but, in the end, it was the price to the taxpayer that mattered. "I agree that open-source platforms can help open competition and that we want a free marketplace," she said. "We are using open source in many areas, and we do realize there are benefits."

But while open source can appear to be cheap, there are extra costs in training and support that mean it may not always be the cheapest solution, Eagle said.

Pugh is a frequent critic of the U.K. government's IT strategy. In November 2006, Pugh called for a "level playing-field in software," arguing that the government was favoring Microsoft above other companies.

Colin Barker of ZDNet UK reported from London.

[ppgreat]

Training is the Dodge Most Often Used

It's a line straight from the Microsoft FUD Playbook. Training is
almost always the biggest one used in persuading someone not
to consider an alternative to an MS product, citing it as the de
facto standard.

It also assumes that absolutely everyone on the planet has the
same level of familiarity with Windows and Office and will
require no additional training on those to be productive.

Not so. Training usually ranks low on the totem pole in any
organization. It usually is referred to in disparaging fashion and
is considered a huge pain?primarily because it's often
implemented poorly.

Training is the easiest thing in the world to do. But wait, you
argue, no one wants to do it and they never really take anything
away from it.

Wrong. If you have people who a) don't want to learn, or b) are
incapable of learning (sometimes referred to as MBAs or
supervisors) then you have hired incorrectly.

For the most part, the average employee WANTS to learn new
and different things, especially if they perceive it will make them
more informed and productive.

[Commander_Spock]

With....

... all due respect to "Mr. John Pugh, who is a member of Parliament, or MP, for Southport and a member of the Public Accounts Committee..." Whose fault is it that the "U.K. government" rely on Microsoft for the stated levels of computing technologies; also, what has happened to all the folks who lived in the UK and was involved in computing technologies to aid in the defense of the UK while it was under Hitler's blitz... have they all died of natural death or were they all been killed under suspicious circumstances so much so that companies in the UK cannot come up with their own computing technologies. It is any wonder as to why England and France did not get their Economics 101 correctly with regards to the financial and economic viability of the operations of the Anglo-French CONCORDE!

Just Hurry On Up With Those International Organisation for Standards (ISO) "Sheffield Class" Office Suite Standards - Microsoft. Wow!

[mwendy]

Free to choose right now

Legislators across the globe are free to make the choices urged by the MEP without added law or legislative "fixes".

But they don't. Why - because the value proposition remains immensely skewed, and fairly at that, toward MSoft and its line of products/services. Millions of free will choices get made each day which reinforce this fact.

Build a better "mousetrap", and the masses will come.

[trueseek1]

$300-600/hr IBM/Oracle/Sun linux consulting fees are not that high

Come on. Give IBM a "break". Their $300-600/hr x team of 8-10 at a time is not too high for running a "free" linux system. Stop hiring cheaper Microsoft labor pool to run easier to run Microsoft tested solutions and follow the lead of a lawmaker dying to take hard earned customer based decisions away from Microsoft and give it to Sun or IBM now :-)!

[tgrenier]

force?

I wish the article would elaborate on Pugh's statements about forcing people to use Microsoft and not letting them use apple. As far as I know it is not against the law to not own a computer much less not onw particular software.

[as901]

It is not just the UK.

The problem is not just the UK. Microsoft has been allowed to violate consumer laws, anti trust laws and has had way too much say so in American politics. Until the equal time rule is restored, companies that have big pockets will always be able to sway politicions both here and in the UK. Any dirty politician can slander any honest politician, and unless the honest man takes dirty money as well, he cannot even defend his reputation in the media.