- Related Stories
-
MySQL Network shifts pricing, licensing
February 15, 2005 -
Intel earns programmer tool a Linux foothold
August 4, 2004 -
Famed open-source compiler upgraded
June 19, 2001
Almost all open-source software is built with GCC, a compiler that converts a program's source code--the commands written by humans in high-level languages such as C--into the binary instructions a computer understands. The forthcoming GCC 4.0 includes a new foundation that will allow that translation to become more sophisticated, said Mark Mitchell, the GCC 4 release manager and "chief sourcerer" of a small company called CodeSourcery.
"The primary purpose of 4.0 was to build an optimization infrastructure that would allow the compiler to generate much better code," Mitchell said.
What's new:
A new version of the GNU Compiler Collection, a set of tools used to build nearly all open-source software, is set to debut in the next few months.
Bottom line:
The new compiler software is likely to create programs that are higher quality and faster, meaning that everything from Apache to Linux and Firefox should get a speed boost.
Compilers are rarely noticed outside the software development community, but GCC carries broad significance. For one thing, an improved GCC could boost performance for the open-source software realm--everything from Linux and Firefox to OpenOffice.org and Apache that collectively compete with proprietary competitors from Microsoft, IBM and others.
For another, GCC is a foundation for an entire philosophy of cooperative software development. It's not too much of a stretch to say GCC is as central an enabler to the free and open-source programming movements as a free press is to democracy.
GCC, which stands for GNU Compiler Collection, was one of the original projects in the Gnu's Not Unix effort. Richard Stallman launched GNU and the accompanying Free Software Foundation in the 1980s to create a clone of Unix that's free from proprietary licensing constraints.
The first GCC version was released in 1987, and GCC 3.0 was released in 2001. A company called Cygnus Solutions, an open-source business pioneer acquired in 1999 by Linux seller Red Hat, funded much of the compiler's development.
But improving GCC isn't a simple matter, said Evans Data analyst Nicholas Petreley. There have been performance improvements that came from moving from GCC 3.3 to 3.4, but at the expense of backwards-compatibility: Some software that compiled fine with 3.3 broke with 3.4, Petreley said.
RedMonk analyst Stephen O'Grady added that updating GCC shouldn't compromise its ability to produce software that works on numerous processor types.
"If they can achieve the very difficult goal of not damaging that cross-platform compatibility and backwards-compatibility, and they can bake in some optimizations that really do speed up performance, the implications will be profound," O'Grady said.
What's coming in 4.0
GCC 4.0 will bring a foundation to which optimizations can be added. Those optimizations can take several forms, but in general, they'll provide ways that the compiler can look at an entire program.
For example, the current version of GCC can optimize small, local parts of a program. But one new optimization, called scalar replacement and aggregates, lets GCC find data structures that span a larger amount of source code. GCC then can break those objects apart so that object components can be stored directly in fast on-chip memory rather than in sluggish main memory.
"Optimization infrastructure is being built to give the compiler the ability to see the big picture," Mitchell said. The framework is called Tree SSA (static single assignment).
However, Mitchell said the optimization framework is only the first step. Next will come writing optimizations that plug into it. "There is not as much use of that infrastructure as there will be over time," Mitchell said.
One optimization that likely will be introduced in GCC 4.1 is called autovectorization, said Richard Henderson, a Red Hat employee and GCC core programmer. That feature economizes processor operations
See more CNET content tagged:
GCC, compiler, GNU, programming tool, Stephen O'Grady






soon ship as Mandrake Linux 10.2 Community. Even
if Mandrake elect not to ship it with the main
distribution, it will be trivial to install from
Cooker. This is not pie-in-the-sky, it's landing
as you read this.
GCC 4.0.x can and probably will be included for the purpose of Developers compiling their own creations. MDK 9.1, a partial migration from GCC 2.96 to GCC 3.x (Sun Java was 2.9.x, but your other browser plug-ins were generally compiled as 3.x-- OOPS) was the worst MDK version of the last 4 years, due mostly to the 2.9.x/3.x Build conflicts. I told everyone to stay on 9.0, then go directly to 9.2.
Incidentally, the upgrade from gcc 3.2/3.3 to 3.4 already provides a significant performance boost both to the kernel and userland in FC3, as compared to earlier Fedora distributions. I'd recommend upgrading to FC3 across the board - that's what I'm doing to all my systems, both server and client desktop.
I havn't noticed any change in performance from FC1 to FC3, particularly with X applications. I used Gnome for the last year and that window manager has always felt a little sluggish compared to my Windows 2000 installation.
Even though GCC4.0 is available, I'm not sure anything was recompiled with it. I suppose the point of Fedora Core is for end users like myself to take the time to recompile an app and test it. I know so little about X11 and X apps in general; but hey, nows as good a time as any to jump in a learn how to optimize X Server and X apps for speed.
I was seriously considering spending the $400.00 to buy Intel's x86 compiler for Linux, since I know that compiler optimizes code very well for speed on x86 chips. Maybe I'll hold off and see how GCC compares with Intels compiler for speed.
- Patent Issues
- by Stomfi March 16, 2005 12:54 AM PST
- Does GCC contain patentable software concepts, and would software compiled with these concepts be infriginging GCC concepts, methods, etc.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)It would be funny if all of MS software fit into this basket.