February 4, 2005 7:14 AM PST

Kazaa's a drag at its own company

Employees at peer-to-peer provider Sharman Networks "hate" installing the company's own Kazaa software because it has ill effects on their computers, according to an internal document written by Sharman's chief technology officer.

The document, entitled "Kazaa Technology 2004" and written by Phil Morle, says that Sharman needs to be careful about installing too much adware on a computer upon the installation of Kazaa. The document is part of a bundle for which a request for confidentiality was rejected this week by Justice Murray Wilcox, the judge overseeing a copyright trial against Sharman in Australia.

The adware "slows down users' machines and can affect other activity such as browsing the Internet," Morle wrote. "We are also adding increasing p2p networks to the users' machines. These are good value to users but they use more resources and create confusion for users as to what resources they are sharing and where this can be controlled."

These two issues could be reasons why Kazaa manages to "lose users by over-stepping the mark," the document said, adding that the company should take into account how many employees at Sharman refuse to install the peer-to-peer software.

"Consider how many people that work for Sharman Networks and its partners that hate installing Kazaa on their machine," Morle wrote.

Record labels Universal Music Australia, EMI, Sony/BMG, Warner, Festival Mushroom and 25 additional applicants are suing Sharman and associated parties--including Brilliant Digital Entertainment, Altnet and Sharman CEO Nikki Hemming--over alleged music copyright infringement made through the Kazaa software.

The Australian record companies assert that Sharman misrepresented the situation when it claimed that "the performance of a personal computer will not be, or is unlikely to be, noticeably affected by its functioning as a supernode for the purposes of the Kazaa software."

Morle's document also stated the company's awareness of the legal risks involved with the technology.

"Our competitors are taking risks legally, but delivering compelling consumer solutions. We need confidence in what we do and must take similar leaps of faith. eDonkey is not yet being sued and is in a strong position to out-innovate us," Morle wrote.

Kristyn Maslog-Levis of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.

5 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment (Log in or register)
People who Steal
Should go to Jail.
Posted by 201293546946733175101343322673 (722 comments )
Reply Link Flag
nah
The greedy CEO's should go to jail.
Posted by wazzledoozle (288 comments )
Link Flag
Very profound.
But what has it got to do with the story about Kazaa employees not using Kazaa?
Posted by (79 comments )
Link Flag
Funny
I reccomend that people don't use Kazaa for the same reason. Glad to see the company agrees with me.
Posted by Andrew J Glina (1673 comments )
Reply Link Flag
That's why I stopped using Kazaa
With Kazaa, it took almost 3 mins after powerup for my PC to react to anything.

After using Ad-Aware and other spyware removal programs to remove all these ad pop ups and tracking, startup of PC is almost immediate...

Wish to find another alternative to Kazaa though...without the ads and spyware...
Posted by (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

Inside CNET News

1-2 of 12

Scroll Left Scroll Right

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.00%) 0.00 12,874.04
S&P 500 (0.00%) 0.00 1,351.77
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 2,931.39
CNET TECH (0.00%) 0.00 2,049.14
  Symbol Lookup