A federal judge on Thursday issued a definitive ruling putting on hold Google's effort to move the Kai-Fu Lee case to California.
In a decision issued late Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge Ronald Whyte ruled that Google's effort to move the Kai-Fu Lee case to California will have to wait until after a trial is held in Washington state court in January.
In staying the case, the judge did not completely shut the door on hearing Google's case, should it lose in Washington.
Google announced in July its plans to hire Lee to head up its China research lab. Microsoft immediately filed suit in Washington against Lee and Google, arguing that Lee was violating a one-year noncompete agreement that was part of his contract with Microsoft.
Google filed its own case in California, asking a judge to strike the noncompete clause. That matter, which has since been moved to federal court, is the one that Whyte has now put on hold.
Under California law, agreements like the one Lee signed are generally unenforceable. However, Whyte ruled on Thursday that Google and Lee can raise that issue in front of the Washington court, which would then have to weigh any conflicts between the laws of California and those of Washington.
"This decision means that our case against Dr. Lee will proceed in Washington on its current schedule," a Microsoft representative said in a statement. A Washington judge initially barred Lee from joining Google, but last month issued a more narrowly focused order that prevents Lee from doing certain work, but allows him to start recruiting for Google in China.
"We would have preferred a ruling on the merits from the California case, but look forward to continuing to litigate the case before the Washington court," Google litigation counsel Michael Kwun said in a statement.
Whyte had said in a preliminary ruling two weeks ago that he was leaning toward granting Microsoft's request for the stay. He then heard testimony from both sides and took the matter under advisement.
The winners here, are the legal eagles and their fees!, for by the time the court hears the matter the time is up, M$ has a win, win situation with any stalemate, no jurisdiction change of venue or no judgement= no precedent, and costing Google a fortune in legal fees, and wasting their time for the last 12 months!
The winners here, are the legal eagles and their fees!, for by the time the court hears the matter the time is up, M$ has a win, win situation with any stalemate, no jurisdiction change of venue or no judgement= no precedent, and costing Google a fortune in legal fees, and wasting their time for the last 12 months!
I'm not a big fan of either Microsoft or Google but I do know two things:
1. Microsoft is complaining about the exact same thing they've done for many years to gain a competitive advantage. 2. In the end, suing Google won't have much impact.
The most effective thing MS can do is fight fire with fire and recruit a Google executive(s) which will negate the advantage Google has gained.
I'm not a big fan of either Microsoft or Google but I do know two things:
1. Microsoft is complaining about the exact same thing they've done for many years to gain a competitive advantage. 2. In the end, suing Google won't have much impact.
The most effective thing MS can do is fight fire with fire and recruit a Google executive(s) which will negate the advantage Google has gained.
There is much outpouring from stars on Twitter at the death of Whitney Houston. Moreover, Houston-related themes dominate the site's top 10 trends. At least in the U.S.
The Web fulminates when it is revealed that executives from VEVO--vehement music industry antipirates--played a pirated stream of an NFL playoff game at a party. VEVO claims it left its Wi-Fi unsupervised. Have we heard that argument before?
Tor's "obfsproxy" technology would make encrypted data look innocuous and let it dodge government censors. That could help citizens in Iran reach blocked sites as antigovernment protests reportedly loom.
MIT creates a simulation to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Spacewar. A relic of the early days of minicomputers, it was one of the first computer video games and set the stage for many others, including Asteroids.
iPhones and Angry Birds aside, the arcade endures. Crave pays a visit--and offers up an homage to games and gamers of years past and a tribute to the possibly endangered, but not yet dead, atmosphere of the arcade itself.
1. Microsoft is complaining about the exact same thing they've done for many years to gain a competitive advantage.
2. In the end, suing Google won't have much impact.
The most effective thing MS can do is fight fire with fire and recruit a Google executive(s) which will negate the advantage Google has gained.
1. Microsoft is complaining about the exact same thing they've done for many years to gain a competitive advantage.
2. In the end, suing Google won't have much impact.
The most effective thing MS can do is fight fire with fire and recruit a Google executive(s) which will negate the advantage Google has gained.