January 5, 2005 6:51 AM PST

Judges rule in favor of pop-ups

Unsolicited pop-up ads that vex millions of Web surfers do not violate a state advertising law, a Utah appeals court has ruled.

The court last week rejected arguments that Celebrity Cruises' Web advertisements ran afoul of a state law regulating unsolicited "electronic messages," ruling that the measure was intended to target junk e-mail but not pop-up ads.

Jesse Riddle, a Salt Lake City attorney, sued Celebrity Cruises after an ad enticing readers to "enter to win a free cruise" popped up on his screen during a visit to The Los Angeles Times' Web site in May 2002.

But the appeals court, in a 4-0 opinion written by Judge Gregory Orme, concluded that because the law was "limited to e-mail sent to e-mail addresses and pop-ups are not sent to e-mail addresses, pop-up ads simply do not come within the act's definition."

Because the Utah law refers at one point to an "e-mail service provider," it could not logically be interpreted as regulating pop-up ads in Web browsers, Orme reasoned. The law was repealed effective May 2004 but was in place when the suit was filed.

While other courts have grappled with whether pop-up ads may infringe on trademark rights, this appears to be the first case in which an antispam law was tested against pop-ups. A trial court previously sided with Celebrity Cruises, which grew out of Royal Caribbean Cruises and operates ships in the Caribbean and the Pacific.

Third-party browsers like Mozilla.org's Firefox and a browser by Opera Software have long offered pop-up blockers. Microsoft added a pop-up blocker to Internet Explorer last year.

 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.