January 27, 2006 1:30 PM PST

Intel's Core Duo health causes PC industry pain

Some companies are already shipping notebooks with Intel's new Core Duo processor, owing to its sooner-than-expected launch date, but larger, less nimble vendors find themselves forced to wait.

Intel formally unveiled the new Core Duo processor at the Consumer Electronics Show earlier this month. Acer and Sony have started shipping a few notebooks that feature the dual-core processor, formerly known by its Yonah code name. But Gateway, Hewlett-Packard, Apple Computer, Lenovo and Dell are still waiting to release their Core Duo notebooks, even though they have announced the specifications and pricing.

Acer is promoting its TravelMate 4202 and 8204 notebooks at CompUSA stores, though the units were out of stock at most stores, according to CompUSA's call center. Sony's FE-590 series notebooks are also listed on CompUSA's Web site as shipping but are out of stock. Those notebooks have a three- to five-day shipping date listed on Sony's Web site.

Comparable notebooks from Dell and Gateway won't ship until the first week of February, based on those companies' Web sites, while Apple's MacBook Pro won't appear in Apple stores until the second week of February, according to a sales representative at the company's San Francisco store. HP is bringing up the rear, with its Core Duo notebook not scheduled to ship until Feb. 24.

Intel traditionally favors its close partners, such as Dell, with early allocations of new processors. But a change in the launch date for Core Duo notebooks in the middle of the development process, according to PC industry sources familiar with Intel's plans, caused a free-for-all in the race to launch Core Duo notebooks.

The Core Duo processor requires PC vendors to buy and configure new motherboards. This meant that product development teams needed a little more time than usual to certify the new notebooks, said Roger Kay, president of Endpoint Technologies Associates.

But Intel decided about two months into a typical nine-month development process, around late summer 2005, to accelerate the launch date for the Core Duo processor to January instead of the original March target, according to sources familiar with the company's planning. The company was delighted with the better-than-expected results from its new 65-nanometer manufacturing technology and was ready with Core Duo chips in the fourth quarter of 2005, executives said in December. But the company was also facing new competitive pressure from Advanced Micro Devices in the notebook market, an area where Intel had kept the smaller company from making gains until late last year.

That decision, however, left PC vendors scrambling to get their notebooks ready as close to the new early January launch date as possible. Smaller vendors like Acer were able to be more aggressive, while larger vendors like Dell and HP needed more time to qualify their notebooks. Apple, which usually prides itself on having systems ready to ship the day they are announced, also had to wait its turn like the rest of the PC industry.

In a business where margins are tight, changes in product development plans can make for a lot of stress at PC companies, said Stephen Baker, director of industry analysis at NPD Techworld. The transition to dual-core chips makes for new design challenges at PC companies, just as they are finally wrapping up the transition to the PCI Express interconnect technology, he said.

Smaller vendors might be able to steal some revenue from their larger competitors by getting out early, but the limited volumes of the early retail launches could backfire by annoying consumers who arrive at a store to pick up a notebook that isn't there, said Nicki D'Onofrio, an analyst with Current Analysis.

"The lack of the hyped-up Core Duo will be frustrating to consumers but will not have a significant negative impact on any one vendor since no one has come to market with a full-blown Core Duo product launch," D'Onofrio said.

Intel and Dell declined to comment about the launch schedule, but HP said in a statement that an earlier ship date is possible.

The Core Duo kicks off what promises to be a full year of transitions for notebook developers. Right on the heels of the Core Duo processor comes Merom, a 64-bit dual-core notebook chip based on Intel's so-called "next-generation architecture," a new low-power set of chip design philosophies. That chip will arrive in the second half of this year. And Microsoft is still scheduled to ship Vista, the successor to Windows XP, by the end of the year.

17 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
iMac Core Duo already out....
Correction: the iMac Core Duo is already out, and Apple has been
shipping quite a bit of them. I've already played with them at
various locations. They're very nice.
Posted by jterhorst (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
The iMac is NOT a notebook computer
Read that first sentence again...
"Some companies are already shipping notebooks with Intel's new Core Duo processor, owing to its sooner-than-expected launch date, but larger, less nimble vendors find themselves forced to wait."

The article is about *notebook* computers. The iMac is not a notebook computer. They're not yet shipping a Core Duo notebook (the MacBook Pro).
Posted by SterlingNorth (1 comment )
Link Flag
Well, Isn't That Special ...
Apple sure improved the availability of new-fangled, high-performance, speed-of-heat processors, huh? At least IBM/Motorola were able to ship _something_ to the stores in time for the launches, even if they couldn't keep up with demand until long after it had evaporated, when the Next Big Thing was announced.

Oh, well, live and learn. I wonder if Steve's on the phone with AMD right now?

All the Best,
Joe Blow
Posted by Joe Blow (175 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Of Course, I'm Referring to the MacBook Pros ...
which I'm guessing are going to be in much higher demand than the InteliMacs (don't bother, I just copyrighted it by publishing it here first, folks! :)

More of the Best,
Joe Blow
Posted by Joe Blow (175 comments )
Link Flag
Huh???
"Apple sure improved the availability of new-fangled, high-
performance, speed-of-heat processors, huh?"

They sure did! We'd probably be waiting another year if they'd
gone with PowerPC.

"At least IBM/Motorola were able to ship _something_ to the
stores in time for the launches"

Yeah, that's not hard when you haven't changed your chip
architecture in 5 years. Seriously, who wants another slow G4?
If Apple wanted to ship in large volume today they could have
gone with Pentium M, which would probably STILL have blown
the doors off the G4.

" I wonder if Steve's on the phone with AMD right now?"

To buy what, exactly? AMD has nothing to compete with the
Core Duo.
Posted by samkass (310 comments )
Link Flag
There were multiple delays for the PowerPC
You clearly don't know what you are talking about and/or have a
short term memory.

The PowerPC has caused multiple delays in the history of the
PPC based Macs.

Many times announced Macs were delayed because of PPC
shortage. The original iMac G5 is the latest example.

But lets get back to where the troubles began.

Starting at 60 MHz, the PowerPC scaled pretty well, and Motorola
was actually shipping PPC that had a faster MHz rating for some
times when they reached 300Mhz.

At around 400Mhz (with the G4), intel took a lead in the MHz
race.

When Apple announced the high-end 500Mhz G4, they actually
had to later change the shipping model to 450MHz, and the
low-end model from 400 to 300MHz. Then it took more than 6
months until moto actually reached 500MHz, and then was stuck
at 500Mhz for a year or so. After that it took way too much time
until it reached the 1GHz mark.

Then the G4 had trouble scaling much higher than 1 GHz. Apple
decided to go with IBM and make the G5 which suddenly
brought Macs to the 2GHz range, when G4 only had reach
1.4GHz

Then I guess you know the rest of the story, IBM promised 3GHz
one year after, and failed their promise. IBM asked Apple for
more money and Jobs said "it's enough", and Apple switched to
plan B.

Anyone that really followed the PowePC/Apple saga over the
years knows that Apple is better off with intel. IBM didn't care
about making a scalable personal computer CPU, while it's intel's
primary business.
Posted by (31 comments )
Link Flag
Dell is shipping Core duo already
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=36118&#38;page=35" target="_newWindow">http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=36118&#38;page=35</a> (read back to about page 25)

there are lots of happy dell new 9400 owners. More are being added everyday now.

(sure pre-ordering was a huge hassle as dell india was not even aware of the 9400 on the 9th.
But things have changed quickly.)

without dell drivers ...they score about 5900 futuremark 2005
Posted by redstarSQD (20 comments )
Reply Link Flag
AMD rules at least another full year
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://sharikou.blogspot.com/" target="_newWindow">http://sharikou.blogspot.com/</a>
Posted by sharikou (106 comments )
Reply Link Flag
If there is anyplace that AMD is worse off than INtel
it is the mobile segment. their mobile chips are not even beating the Pentium M, dun even have to talk about Duo.
Posted by pjianwei (206 comments )
Link Flag
Rules what?
What do they rule? Gaming benchmarks? Do they rule the desktop market? Notebook market? Server market?

Are they even close to being even in any of them?

99.9% of the computing world does not care about 3dmark
Posted by Lindy01 (443 comments )
Link Flag
This isn't very big news...
This is the same with any high end chip from Intel or AMD. AMD had a strong advantage at getting to market before Intel with dual core chips.

What is interesting is that a couple years after 32 bit x86 computing was supposed to be replaced by 64 bit we are seeing companies like Apple jump onto the chip, and multi-core has finally come home.
Posted by zaznet (1138 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Got my Dell Core Duo
Enjoyed reading this on my Dell E1705 Core Duo, especially the part about my computer not being shipped yet, hee hee. Ordered on Jan 17 and received Jan 27. Love gaming on it, Age of Empires III and Black and White 2, at 1920X1200. Makes a nice little TV too even thought Windows Media Center is buggy.
Posted by mosshaven (20 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Misleading Headline
While I can understand the discussion on "laptops" vs. "desktops," the headline for this article can seem misleading. The headline seems to read about the Core Duo chips, while the text speaks of Laptops specifically.

From my understanding, the Core Duo is considered a "laptop" chip. This would explain the article speaking on laptops and their shipping woes. However, Apple (I believe) is the only computer manufacturer putting a supposed laptop chip into a desktop computer. This is from "My" personal understanding of how the industry looks at things. Just like the centrino line of intel processors almost never end up in desktop machines.

So, the article could be a little more specific if it was speaking on the Core Duo chips in general, or Core Duo in laptops. The least they could add is a line that says "Apple also uses the Core Duo chips in their iMac line that is currently shipping" to better explain their story.
Posted by wakko701 (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.