September 26, 2005 12:29 PM PDT

Intel introduces last single-core Xeon

Related Stories

Intel's dual-core Xeon makes Dell debut

September 25, 2005

Galaxy remakes Sun's server strategy

September 12, 2005

Intel speeds dual-core Xeon debut

August 15, 2005
Intel introduced its last single-core Xeon processors Tuesday, two models that consume lower amounts of power than regular versions of the server chip.

The models are a 55-watt, 3GHz Xeon LV and a 90-watt, 3.2GHz Xeon MV, Intel said. In contrast, Intel's conventional 3.8GHz dual-processors are 110-watt chips.

Chipmakers are working on processors that consume less electrical power and, correspondingly, throw off less waste heat. And it's not just because energy and electricity prices are increasing. Chips that consume less power make it easier for computer makers to design systems and easier for customers to fill data centers without facing overheating problems. Intel's new low-voltage models are geared for blade servers and other models that pack processors more densely into computing chassis.

Dual-core processors typically run at lower clock speeds than their single-core equivalents. But dual-core models can perform better even at lower clock speeds when the workload is divided into multiple independent instruction sequences, called threads.

Intel has lagged behind rival Advanced Micro Devices in releasing dual-core server chips, which combine two processing engines onto a single slice of silicon. But the larger company has more than a dozen dual-core and multicore chips in development and plans to announce its first dual-core Xeon, called Paxville, in coming weeks. Paxville will come in two versions, one for servers with dual processors and one for servers with four or more processors.

AMD's mainstream Opteron chips are 95-watt models, though a 120-watt "special edition" is available. So far only Sun Microsystems uses the SE version. AMD also sells lower-wattage models for blade servers and other densely packed computer designs.

AMD has gained market share against Intel with Opteron. But Merrill Lynch analyst Joe Osha expects Intel will fight back with pricing, keeping AMD's profit margins from growing.

1 comment

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Price.
Intel my undercut AMD in it's prices, but I still wouldn't buy an Intel processor theses days. AMD just produces better chips at the moment. I'm sure that in the near future Intel will start fighting back with better chips that cost less, but until then it's AMD for me.
Posted by System Tyrant (1453 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.