March 3, 2007 4:00 PM PST
Intel 'hacker' sentence expunged
- Related Stories
-
Pentium III: How bad is privacy threat?
March 26, 1999 -
Descartes targets vertical markets
November 6, 1998
Randall Schwartz had his arrest and conviction for bypassing Intel security systems "set aside" at the beginning of February, legally giving him a clean slate.
Schwartz was arrested in 1993 after using a program called "Crack" to find out the passwords of various former colleagues in the Intel Supercomputer Systems Division (SSD). Schwartz had left SSD under a cloud, and told the court he decided to crack the Intel passwords to show that SSD's security had gone downhill since he had left, and to reestablish respect he said he had lost when he left SSD.
In late 1995, Schwartz was convicted of three counts of computer crime and ordered to pay Intel $68,000 restitution. His sentence also included five years of probation, 480 hours of community service and 90 days of deferred (cancelable) jail time. His legal bill exceeded $170,000 by the end of 1995.
Schwartz has argued that his conviction was unfair, as he had not intended to cause any malicious damage. After an appeal, the restitution was dropped in 1999.
In October 2006, Schwartz appealed for clemency from a Democratic governor who "had already granted a few pardons," Schwartz explained on the Yahoo Tech Groups site. At the beginning of February 2007, an Oregon court ordered an expungement of his conviction.
Schwartz said that it will take a while for him to absorb the result.
"Even a few weeks later, I'm still in a bit of shock that I've reached this point in this over-13-year journey," Schwartz said. "It probably won't fully sink in until the first time I travel freely into Canada, or fill out a contractor form that asks the question about criminal history, or apply for a Small Business Administration program that was formerly unavailable to me."
Tom Espiner reported from London for
See more CNET content tagged:
conviction,
contractor,
supercomputer,
sentence,
Intel







its pretty sad that he can find a job now!
employers need to wake up
Randall isn't one of these though. My memory is that he got into a lunchroom fight w/ some senior Intel guy about how easy it'd be to steal passwords. He was attempting to convince them to require stronger passwords.
In a fit he ran some type of common dictionary attach that hashed common words, compared to a password file, and when they matched showed the plain-text password. He gave them the list -- without logging in as anybody or giving it away (or threatening to do so) -- with a strong "told ya' so" 'tude.
Rather than admit to Intel senior managers that they'd configured their password policy poorly they called Randall some sort of unstable hacker and prosecuted him.
This was basically a case of office politics turned into trumped-up charges. There are plenty of "real" (and real-bad) computer criminals. Wasting time processing and prosecuting Randall was time that could and should have been better spent on them.
- Why not?
-
by wbenton
March 7, 2007 6:48 AM PST
- If they just slap the wrist of 18-year olds caught red handed for trying to bribe hundreds of thousands of dollars in an FBI sting operation after stealing passwords and threatening to release the info if the money was not paid...
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 22 Comments >>I see why not let him go free. Only two things remaining. Why did his lawyer fees run up to $170,000 and who's going to refund that?
Averaged out, that comes up to approx $12,000/year for the past 14 years.
What ever happened to the right to a speedy trial?
FWIW