April 26, 2005 12:00 PM PDT
Insecurities over Indian outsourcing
- Related Stories
-
LexisNexis flap draws outcry from Congress
April 12, 2005 -
Indian police make arrests in outsourcing fraud
April 8, 2005 -
LexisNexis break-in spurs more calls for reform
March 9, 2005 -
Clearing up the confusion over outsourcing
August 9, 2004 -
Tech professionals group wary of offshoring
March 18, 2004 -
IT firms expand from PCs to payroll
January 14, 2003
Some say there's little risk, while others warn of serious hazards, including a threat to America's national sovereignty.
In the incident, former call center employees of Mphasis are accused of taking part in a theft of $350,000 from U.S. consumers' bank accounts.
What's new:
A case of bank fraud involving an Indian outsourcer has rekindled debate about using overseas contractors for tasks involving sensitive data.
Bottom line:
Some observers warn of serious hazards in shipping data abroad, including a threat to America's national sovereignty. Not everyone agrees, but even the perception of danger could hurt the market.
"This was not a lapse of judgment or an issue of poor customer service: The incident was an organized and systematic plot to steal customers' money," John McCarthy, an analyst at Forrester Research, wrote recently. "Forrester believes that this breach, coupled with recent onshore disclosures of sensitive customer data, will have far-reaching negative connotations for the offshore BPO (business process outsourcing) space."
Not everyone shares this view. But even the perception of danger could hurt the market.
A report from rival researcher Gartner played down the security risks but made no bones about the seriousness of the situation. "The entire Indian offshore industry ecosystem--including...the Indian government--must act quickly and decisively to counter the perception that Indian BPO poses a severe security risk," the report said.
Business process outsourcing, or BPO in industry parlance, refers to farming out tasks such as customer service and transaction processing to a separate company. The work could be done in the United States, or completed in lower-wage countries such as India or Mexico. In addition, some organizations have set up their own operations offshore. Shipping tasks offshore has become a controversial issue for U.S. labor advocates.
At the moment, U.S. organizations devote only a small fraction of their budgets for information technology services--including BPO--to low-cost countries, according to a recent Merrill Lynch survey of chief information officers. But that share of the budget is expected to grow over time, from 0.9 percent in 2004 to 1.6 percent in two-to-three years.
According to the Merrill Lynch report, security fears are the main reason CIOs aren't moving IT work offshore faster: The "key inhibitor preventing companies (from using) offshore outsourcing remains data security," the report said.
Earlier this month, news broke that police in India arrested three former Mphasis call center employees who allegedly stole U.S. customers' personal account information and transferred about $350,000 to fake accounts in Pune. Among other people arrested in the case was a
See more CNET content tagged:
Mphasis BFL Ltd.,
BPO,
outsourcing company,
call-center,
offshore







- Mohan B, Author
http://www.offshoringmanagement.com
currently concerned with outsourcing of government services
especially healthcare data to US based business. The reason is
that under the USA patriot act the USA government could
secretly request this data and there is nothing to prevent abuse.
See link for example:
http://www.nationalreviewofmedicine.com/issue/2004_04_22/
goverment_medicine01_08.htm
A very similar argument.