Wasn't the idea for p2p that you paid by sharing some of your bandwidth? If I paid a service I would expect THEM to supply the bandwidth for everyone's downloads. For instance, iTunes. Apple pays for all of the bandwidth costs and you download directly from them. The new Napter I assume works the same way, downloading directly from their servers (I could be wrong on that I have never used it).
I guess they are trying to do something that doesn't totally screw the consumer, so that could be interpreted as a good thing.
Actually this is nothing new. Here in Canada File Sharing is legitimate too. Our copywrite board made a decision a few years back to levy a fee on all recordable media. On the grounds that the media would be used to store downloaded music and such. The money collected was to be returned to the authors. Many of us fought against this new levy (myself included) because it made no distinction between a disk used to back up your hard drive and one that you filled with mp3 from the internet. This levy effectively made downloading music/movies in Canada legal. On the flip side a judge determined that placing files in a folder that is shared does not constitute distribution and therefore having files available for upload is also legal. The new french bill sounds like it just simplifies what we currently have in Canada.
As for the music and entertainment industries placing pressure on the government to squash this bill... Its time the governments remembered who their mandate comes from... the people, not industries. No matter how much money and influence industries flash around, in the end, the public votes in governments, not industry. And remember also that copywrite and patents are actually government granted monopolies and not actual rights. This bill might just be what is needed to wake everyone up to these facts.
If France does completely undo copyright laws, I would expect the reaction to be along the lines of limited distribution of copyrighted materials to France. Less music, fewer films, etc. The idea being that people would rather have file sharing outlawed than having to wait 6 months to a year for "new releases" and pressure the government to make the change back to "the old way."
Web giant is spending $120 million to beef up its Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, according to filings with the city reviewed by the San Jose Mercury News.
The Samsung Galaxy mini 2 S6500 could make its debut at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona later this month, according to a leaked promotional image.
Tor's "obfsproxy" technology would make encrypted data look innocuous and let it dodge government censors. That could help citizens in Iran reach blocked sites as antigovernment protests reportedly loom.
MIT creates a simulation to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Spacewar. A relic of the early days of minicomputers, it was one of the first computer video games and set the stage for many others, including Asteroids.
George Lucas has just released his version of "Star Wars" in 3D, but c'mon--the guy believes Greedo shot first. Why not make your own Star Wars world? In the first installment of a Crave series, a crack team of crafters fight the power and turn paper bags into the Rebel Alliance's Admiral Ackbar. It's a sack!
I guess they are trying to do something that doesn't totally screw the consumer, so that could be interpreted as a good thing.
As for the music and entertainment industries placing pressure on the government to squash this bill... Its time the governments remembered who their mandate comes from... the people, not industries. No matter how much money and influence industries flash around, in the end, the public votes in governments, not industry. And remember also that copywrite and patents are actually government granted monopolies and not actual rights. This bill might just be what is needed to wake everyone up to these facts.