- Related Stories
-
FAQ: New Energy Act gets green light
December 19, 2007 - Related Blogs
-
An LED breakthrough in Korea?
June 19, 2009 -
Can lasers save the incandescent lightbulb?
June 3, 2009
New energy standards are causing major innovation in incandescent lightbulbs, a family of bulbs that some thought would not survive.
(From The New York Times)
The story "Incandescent bulbs return to the cutting edge" published July 6, 2009 at 1:31 PM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.






It's excellent that American innovation has once again overcome government stupidity. I bet private industry even created at least 1 job for every 2.2 jobs destroyed by this idiotic California legislation, just like every hidden tax those morons dream up.
Whilst the amount of mercury used in production a CFL bulb is at most 6mg, the average mercury content is 4mg. The total emissions of mercury created by a CFL bulb from electricity consumption over its lifetime is about 2.4mg of mercury. In comparison the emissions from an incandescent light bulb is about 10mg. Therefore overall CFLs result in a reduced amount of mercury emitted over the lifetime of a CFL bulb. The real gain is the reduction of 38kg of Co2 per CFL per year and an overall saving of 14% on your electricity bill.
Paranoia and Stupidity are more deadly then anything.
Second, when it's 20*F outside, heat is a very welcome feature of light bulbs.
I could run a 1200 watt space heater in the dark, or run a few 100 watt light bulbs in my office, and lighten it's load.
But don't just look at mercury, look at the coal being burned and released into the air to power the 1000000000000000000000 old style bulbs. You think that is fun to breath?
(hint: CFL's don't work worth a crap in either fixture, and they aren't exactly gentle on the human iris - hence the headaches in individuals sensitive to such things).
--
OTOH, I rather enjoy not paying out the nose for lighting bills, and lvoe the fact that the last CFL bulb I replaced died off after two years of near-continuous use.
--
Not for or against either type, but rather, I'm saying that there are perfectly normal uses for both types. I'd prefer LED over CFL, though, but that can get a bit pricey...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090529121556.htm
Here's an article that details the original experiment and some of it's other uses:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080201090845.htm
But basically this laser can change the surface properties on a light bulb filament, and by doing this researchers can create a mental that is much more efficient at emitting light. Now imagine if this technology was coupled with high quality gases and special coatings that turn the excess heat into light. You could probably augment the efficiency 100 fold.
See my experiences regarding LED lighting at home and get a link to a recent NY Times article at
http://nedrep.org/node/565
the led chip( low binning low quality)- thermal mgmt poor - optics get a c- or d+ the construct of the wannabes
is like that of a yugo or trabant( really bad cars ) Buy quality or enjoy your decision ( mean"t to say endure it)
Borealis is an outstanding example of a quality product - full line of lumeniares par 20,30,38s Mr16- fluorescent
replacement options ,street lighting decor lighting this exemplifies A great product from the Usa
Costcos lighting is like going to a taco bell expecting fine cuisine you can't get it there !
CF is alchemy, a attempt of turning mercury into gold.
Up until the government mandated change there was no need to improve the incandescent light. The point of the article is now there are changes and improvements being done to the lightbulb and those changes are making them viable again. While you appear to have some exaggerated misconceptions about what constitutes "cutting edge" these improvements are in fact very significant.
- by scottthesculptor July 7, 2009 8:53 AM PDT
- Halogen lights convert the heat from the incandescent filament into more light.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by sslPro July 10, 2009 10:49 PM PDT
- factually halogen bulbs are inferior to Solid State Lighting/ if your halogen bulb is tilted ex track lighting
- Like this
-
(19 Comments)They've always been more efficient but more costly.
This is just putting infra-red "mirror sunglasses" on the gas capsules.
woo - high tech
Still a 70 watt bulb instead of a 40 watt for about the same light as an incredibly inefficient 100 watt one.
Back in the old days I used nothing but halogen light - it's the best light.
Now I use flourescents overall and a halogen desk lamp for when I need to see detail.
This *is* the 21st century - consume less.
expect a 30% reduction in lifespan ( due to the gases ) they can't be phased out soon enough.
Get Leds ( Quality Leds) I use them - last months Comed bill was $31.00 for a family of 4
Really do it soon start reducing consumption; but by 2012 the will be commonplace due to the ban