"At the high-tech end, the real story that we see is a tale of two economies," says Levy, an economist who directs the Palo Alto, Calif.-based Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy. As Levy sees it, the contradictions are most keenly revealed in the statistics about tech professionals who have jobs and those collecting unemployment checks. The tech mecca continues to lose jobs in the fields of software, semiconductors, and computer and communications hardware. But at the same time, average pay for people working within Silicon Valley's different tech sectors climbed in 2003, the last year for which such recorded data are available.
Levy advises the nonprofit group Joint Venture: Silicon Valley Network, which recently released its annual index on the region. The index shows a curious combination of strengths and weaknesses. For example, venture capital investment in Silicon Valley rose by 15 percent last year, and the region now receives 35 percent of the nation's venture capital, up from 14 percent in 1995. What's more, job losses were less severe than in the previous two years. On the other hand, the gap between low-income households and other households increased. And housing became less affordable, especially for the poorest residents.
CNET News.com spoke to Levy about the state of Silicon Valley's economy, challenges the area faces from other emerging technology hubs and the first thing he'd do to improve Silicon Valley's prospects. (Hint: It's a lot lower-tech than a new computer chip or piece of software.)
Q: Silicon Valley lost 1.3 percent of its jobs last year, and average pay went down by 1 percent. Is it a sign that the high-tech economy is in trouble?
A: The job levels have fallen really substantially.
The headline is that since 2000, Santa Clara County lost over 200,000 jobs. It lost a little over 20 percent of its job base, and by comparison, that's the largest amount that any metropolitan area lost since the Great Depression. So 2004 was a very modest continuation of those losses when other areas were turning around. Wages went up in high tech and down a little bit overall.
At the high-tech end, the real story that we see is a tale of two economies. If you ask how high-tech companies are doing, their sales are up, and the profits are often up, and the exports are up. And within the high-tech industry, the wages are up, despite that overall figure. Kind of everything is up but job numbers. And that's a huge "but." So people who are working are starting to do better. And then you have the rest of the economy--the people who are waiting to see job growth. And that's not happening.
Do you think that this is a predictable change in the wake of the boom of the late '90s? In other words, was it too big of an expansion then?
It's the balance between sales growth and productivity. When sales were growing by 20 percent, whatever productivity was, the sales level was enough to hire a lot more workers. But now sales overall are only growing by 6 percent or 8 percent or 10 percent. And you've still got productivity and consolidation. It doesn't support an increasing work force. We're not growing in demand worldwide fast enough to support the kind of job growth that we had in the '90s.
We are also in a big hiatus on the infusion of venture capital. It's really back down to '97 and '98 levels. The question is, can it go a lot higher?
Last year was an exception, is that correct? There was a 15 percent increase.
I'm not sure whether it was 15 percent. But it's like you dropped 80 percent and then you bounce back 5 percent or 10 percent. The other way to look at this is asking, "Was 2004 better than 2003?" Yes, except for job growth. And the same holds for 2005. If you ask, "Is either year remotely like 2000?" the answer is no. So it depends on your date of comparison.
You expect 2005 to be continuing somewhat better trends?
For the companies. I'm not sure there will be a lot of employment growth. If you're in, you may be able to do better. If you're not in, it might be hard to get in.
What do you say about the impact of offshore economic trends? In other words, sending work to India and China and the Philippines. Is that playing a role in the job losses?
I think it plays a modest role nationally. There's always been globalization. Now there's globalization in services. I would emphasize that what's different now is the spigot of new company creation; it's a lot less forceful than it was (in the late 1990s).
You've got to be inventing something new to do, because the older stuff gets mature. We've stopped doing the creation side, and so the outsourcing is more visible, but I don't think it's accelerated that much.
When you say stop doing the creation side, can you tell me more about what you mean?
It's the venture capital--the level of the capital funding is down 80 percent or 70 percent. Maybe the last two or three years were an anomaly, but then that would mean that the really high rates of job growth were an anomaly, and we don't know right now.
There was an impressive figure of the Silicon Valley gaining a larger share of the nation's venture capital.
It's true. What that says is, if you look at Silicon Valley, we haven't yet suffered any competitive loss. We are in an industry that's not creating jobs. It's a little bit like Los Angeles and the aerospace
See more CNET content tagged:
Silicon Valley, economy, venture capital, economist, productivity
- "This government" and the Deification of the Market Economy
- by djugan February 11, 2005 7:47 AM PST
- The singular embrace of savage capitalism and corporate America by the Bush administration and the dominant party in Congress has led to a raft of disconnects in our economy.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- God, you're stupid
- by jswap May 23, 2005 3:07 PM PDT
- What a wack job.
- Like this
-
(4 Comments)Not the least of these disconnects involves an invisible but highly functional barrier that limits the movement of the rewards and benefits of a productive economy beyond Wall Street to the Main Streets of America.
It seems to me that we will be subject to these disconnects and the hypocrisy of entrenched ideologues for the foreseeable future.