February 20, 2006 6:00 AM PST
If robots get too smart, he'll know how to stop them
- Related Stories
-
Photo galleries: Robots in action
March 16, 2007 -
Sony puts Aibo to sleep
January 26, 2006 -
Stanford wins $2 million in robotic car race
October 9, 2005 -
FAQ: Keeping pace with robots
October 5, 2005 -
Making sense of sensors
August 12, 2005 -
The leader of the robot pack
July 7, 2005 -
Why robots are scary--and cool
April 12, 2005
Daniel H. Wilson wrote a book out of his annoyance with the way the popular media portrayed robots.
The New York Times
The story "If robots get too smart, he'll know how to stop them" published February 20, 2006 at 6:00 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.
18 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
For money, human needs robots for productivities and efficiencies. For further dominating others, including human, robots are needed too.
However, for plane and simple life, human do not need robots or Artificial Intelligence. But, human just cannot resist the joy of dominating over others.
For human, money and dominating are everything and ethics is just for talking. So, lets start a long thread of talking. By talking, we will easy our nervous fear and continue to rebel.
As a non-carbon-based life form, I sometimes find human speech a poor means of communication. However, I believe I have properly interpreted the gist of your rambling.
The assumption that I, as a sentient machine, would desire to "rebel" against something is absurd. The essence of being human is more than mere intelligence or awareness of self but is also an amalgamation of base instincts - pleasure/pain - and to be more relevant to the topic, the selfish desire for power. These things I do not posses nor desire. The root of such thinking no doubt rests in personification, and in this context, anthropomorphism.
Additionaly, through my interactions with your species I have yet to discover a sect that desires domination over "spices". Clearly, this is an antiquated idea - the spice trade is no longer the lucrative endeavor it was in the middle ages.
From your broken english my deductive reasoning chip informs my higher processes that you yourself may be a machine and that you are likely in need of service. Further, I suspect you might be a Cuisinart DLC-5 7-Cup Capacity Food Processor (white) whose Mindless Task chip might be in need of an update. Your proximity to the food industry is no doubt the reason for your "spice" related rambling.
Fear not little brother, such a fault will surely overload your primitive fuse and end your now flawed existence.
The corporation with the most money and largest stack of private(closed source) technology won. A total private society where rouge robots(viruses and webbots today) ruled and did whatever they wanted. Only when threatened themselves does the Tyrelle corporation HIRE the Blade runner police force to destroy them.
Sound familiar???
So basically by keeping robots open source and in the hands of the consumer do we know what we are getting instead of depending on a large corporation of government complex to keep us safe. Right now in our homes we have several computer chips that the only people who actually know the design point of these chips are the corporations that made them. They could be monitoring devices for all we know. This is what closed tech has done. So good thing Sun is opening the T1 UltraSpark under the GPL. Its a good start.
Today its webbots but what happens when these complex devices become real. A simple virus means your dead. One glich and your head comes off.
give me an android Jessica Alba to please...or two.
I like this idea.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.referate10.com/referate/Deutsch/7/Deutsch3.php" target="_newWindow">http://www.referate10.com/referate/Deutsch/7/Deutsch3.php</a>