Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: NARUTO SHIPPUDEN latest episode

January 25, 2006 5:31 AM PST

IBM accused of denying overtime pay

  • 12 comments

Suit says company misclassified full-time computer installation and maintenance workers as exempt from overtime.
The New York Times

The story "IBM accused of denying overtime pay" published January 25, 2006 at 5:31 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Benefits of Unions
by January 25, 2006 6:55 AM PST
Unions were started to protect workers against this type of abuse. Do you really think Elaine Chao the current Secretary of Labor cares about the worker or big money.
Reply to this comment
Not a benefit
by David Arbogast January 25, 2006 12:09 PM PST
These employees aren't in a union and yet they still have the right to disagree with their employer and sue for damages. If the court finds IBM guilty, then the workers win.

Think about this... what good would a union do for these employees?

It would charge dues to be paid out of employee salary.

It would likely have initiated a strike before a court review that would cripple IBM and strand thousands more workers without pay.

It would put big dollars in the pockets of the union leaders while leveraging the employee's productivity and salary against their special interists... which... as anybody who's paying attention can attest to... is NOT the interest of the employee.

Let the courts rule... its their job. A union for computer workers would only make things worse.
Benefits of Unions
by January 25, 2006 6:55 AM PST
Unions were started to protect workers against this type of abuse. Do you really think Elaine Chao the current Secretary of Labor cares about the worker or big money.
Reply to this comment
Not a benefit
by David Arbogast January 25, 2006 12:09 PM PST
These employees aren't in a union and yet they still have the right to disagree with their employer and sue for damages. If the court finds IBM guilty, then the workers win.

Think about this... what good would a union do for these employees?

It would charge dues to be paid out of employee salary.

It would likely have initiated a strike before a court review that would cripple IBM and strand thousands more workers without pay.

It would put big dollars in the pockets of the union leaders while leveraging the employee's productivity and salary against their special interists... which... as anybody who's paying attention can attest to... is NOT the interest of the employee.

Let the courts rule... its their job. A union for computer workers would only make things worse.
Beneift of Unions
by January 25, 2006 6:56 AM PST
This is why unions started. Do you really think Elaine Chao the current Secretary of Labor will support the worker or Big Money?
Reply to this comment
Beneift of Unions
by January 25, 2006 6:56 AM PST
This is why unions started. Do you really think Elaine Chao the current Secretary of Labor will support the worker or Big Money?
Reply to this comment
State Taxes will drive prosecution
by January 25, 2006 8:49 AM PST
In most states it is OK not to pay professionals for overtime. However it is a big no-no not to pay state taxes for the services rendered. This has happened a number of times here in California, and the Franchise Tax Board always gets it's share. Read your employee agreements very closely. You will find that you probably signed away your rights to OT.
Reply to this comment
Can't "sign away" OT
by Rusdude January 25, 2006 10:49 AM PST
While I'm not familiar with state-by-state laws, generally if an employment agreement you signed violates legislation, it's not valid.
View reply
State Taxes will drive prosecution
by January 25, 2006 8:49 AM PST
In most states it is OK not to pay professionals for overtime. However it is a big no-no not to pay state taxes for the services rendered. This has happened a number of times here in California, and the Franchise Tax Board always gets it's share. Read your employee agreements very closely. You will find that you probably signed away your rights to OT.
Reply to this comment
Can't "sign away" OT
by Rusdude January 25, 2006 10:49 AM PST
While I'm not familiar with state-by-state laws, generally if an employment agreement you signed violates legislation, it's not valid.
View reply
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

advertisement

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

IBM (0.00%) 0.00 127.25
Dow Jones Industrials (0.22%) 22.75 10,388.90
S&P 500 (0.55%) 6.06 1,105.98
NASDAQ (0.98%) 21.21 2,194.35
CNET TECH (0.29%) 4.71 1,602.07
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right