- Related Stories
-
Sirius nabs Martha Stewart
April 18, 2005 -
AOL tunes in XM for radio deal
April 11, 2005 -
Can Howard Stern now relax?
January 24, 2005 -
Mixed legacy for FCC's Powell
January 21, 2005 -
Is Sir Elton XM's 'Answer in the Sky'?
November 8, 2004 -
Will Stern turn satellite radio into a star?
October 7, 2004 -
Shock jock Stern jumps to satellite radio
October 6, 2004
In an interview, the shock jock dampens expectations that his new satellite radio show would go way beyond the fringe.
The New York Times
The story "Howard Stern prepares for life without limits" published October 22, 2005 at 4:00 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from The New York Times expires after 7 days.






his studio at the satellite too. But there are some people who
actually think Howard is entertaining, and it's not worth moving
them into orbit too. So, the status quo remains. And the 'off' button
is a wonderful invention.
That our once great country would pay a "man" like this $100 milion for pure depravity is a measure of how far we have fallen. He and his demonic paymasters hide behind the mask of First Amendment rights while continuing to corrupt our youth. That is the Devil incarnate, peddling corruption as "freedom". There is nothing freeing about his behaviour, it is enslavement pure and simple. His show's guests are pathetic, lost souls which he feeds off of, like a vampire.
I can honestly say that I have never run into a single child or teen that can quote Howard Stern. Not ONE. My children don't listen to him because we don't turn his show on when they are in the car. Imagine that. A parent who actually monitors what is played in front of their children! Alert the government! We've found one!
Regarding his "degredation" of women, I don't recall him ever forcing a woman onto his program. All of these people show up on their own. It's not as if they don't know why they are there. No one has told them that they were actually going to be on a family values radio program and then sprung Howard and the gang on them. No. People choose to go on his show because they feel their exposure and brush with fame is worth their exploitation. Free country, free will. And it's my choice to turn off the radio if I don't want to hear it.
Lastly, this is not a "once great country" but, rather, STILL the greatest democratic country on the planet. I have traveled the globe and have not found another country that offers the freedoms and opportunities that America offers it's citizens. Even with our "demonic paymasters" and our "self righteous, religious zealots".
- A bunch of crap...
- by October 24, 2005 3:11 PM PDT
- If Howard Stern was SUCH a bad guy, why was he not pulled
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Like the FCC needs his money
- by sanenazok October 24, 2005 8:42 PM PDT
- I'm pretty sure that the fine money does not go to the FCC, but instead it goes to the national treasury where it is shared by all agencies. Even if they all went to the FCC his fines are a pittance. To you or me $1 million is an unimaginable sum, to the trillionaire government it's nothing.
- Like this
-
(8 Comments)years ago? MONEY, he makes tons of it for him and even more
for the station. The FCC cares about our well being and decency
as much as a wolf does for a flock of sheep. He made them tons
of money in fines too. At least it's nice he puts it on as a fight
for free speech. I don't care for his views, so I don't listen to
him. The point is more to the FCC and Infinity bickering about
his behavior, putting "restrictions" on him. Good, send the FCC
and big radio giants to outer space along with his show.
Anyhow, every time the FCC fines someone they rack up large legal bills too, since every breast-showing potty mouth will go to great lengths defending their "protected expression."