- Related Stories
-
Congress divided on broadcast flag plan
November 3, 2005 -
Politico wants to move up DTV deadline
October 18, 2005 -
Digital TV changeover suggested for 2009
July 12, 2005 -
No more delays on digital TV
May 4, 2004 -
FCC pushes digital TV adoption
August 8, 2002
Representatives want to complete the country's transition away from analog television by Feb. 17, 2009, freeing up airwaves.
The story "House approves new digital-TV deadline" published December 19, 2005 at 4:52 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.




- hmm...1.5 Billion dollars
-
by waldadam
December 19, 2005 9:43 AM PST
- I'm glad to see digital TV coming and all... but 1.5 billion dollars just to make sure our couch potato life style isn't interrupted. I don't think the converter subsidy is necessary. I've been in some of the poorest places and it's amazing how the people always manage to be able to afford a T.V. 1.5 billion dollars??, heck the hydrogen fund only got 1.2 billion, and I think energy security is a lot more important than T.V.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
- Agree
-
by bommai
December 19, 2005 9:58 AM PST
- Completely agree. Energy independence is more important than TV. Also, I highly doubt 73 million households will be affected. I have read that about 12% of America still uses analog OTA for getting TV. That does not add upto 73 million. However, they might have gotten 73 million by including TVs owned by people that also have satellite dish, cable, etc. but may also have a third or fourth TV that is hooked to an antenna.
-
View
reply
-
(5 Comments)I would prefer just get the bandwidth back from the TV broadcasters and let the people be resourceful on their own. I am not a Bush backer, but what happened to his concept of Ownership-Society!!