By Ina Fried
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
April 26, 2006 4:00 AM PST
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--After an hour-long discussion at a status meeting last month, the Hotmail redesign really boiled down to one key decision: one big ad, or two?
After months of reworking the venerable Web mail program, Microsoft's team had made all the easy fixes: They'd added more colors and even offered a way to make the new Windows Live Mail look just like the old Hotmail.
But sitting around a table in the nondescript Pyre conference room in Microsoft's Silicon Valley offices, the half-dozen developers and managers couldn't avoid the thorny issue that remained. A significant number of people believed that the new design had too much space devoted to ads, making it hard to use some of the mail program's new features.
December 1997
Microsoft acquires Hotmail and its 8 million users.
December 1998
Hotmail tops 30 million users.
December 1999
Hotmail hits 52 million users.
April 2004
Google announces Gmail.
July 2005
Microsoft demos improved Hotmail (code-named Kahuna) at a financial analysts conference. Starts public testing.
September 2005
Yahoo launches a limited U.S. beta of its improved Yahoo Mail service with features like drag-and-drop organization and a built-in RSS reader.
November 2005
Microsoft announces Windows Live, including plans to rename Hotmail as Windows Live Mail.
The ad placement decision may seem minor. But it's a key one for Microsoft, which is trying to turn Hotmail's hundreds of millions of casual e-mail users into customers for a wide variety of Windows Live personal services.
Offer too many ads and the company risks alienating users and sending them flocking to rival online services. But if it forsakes the second ad, it risks choking the revenue the business needs to compete with the likes of Yahoo and Google.
"Removing one of those ad products is a very costly thing," product planner Richard Sim told his colleagues during a meeting about the ad issue, among others. But in the end, everyone knew what had to be done. Painful as it was, they had to side with their users and hope the dollars would be there.
It's a big bet for Microsoft, which has spent the past two years overhauling Hotmail into what is now dubbed Windows Live Mail. After years of leaving the e-mail service largely on autopilot, Microsoft was jolted into action on April Fools' Day 2004, when Google launched Gmail, a Web-based e-mail service with a gigabyte of free storage. Since then, Microsoft has been racing to catch up.
Sara Radicati, who heads the analyst firm Radicati Group, said an overhaul is definitely needed.
"The Hotmail service has kind of lagged behind some of the others," Radicati said. By being early to the market with a free service, Hotmail for years found it easy to sign up more and more users. "Probably, they became a little bit complacent."
Even those inside the company generally agree that the launch of Gmail was a giant wake-up call.
"When Gmail came, it basically raised the bar on expectations and also capabilities of what is a modern Web browser application," said Richard Craddock, the development manager for Windows Live Mail, which is set for launch later this year.
Microsoft had been kicking around ideas on how to revamp Hotmail since at least 2002, but the ideas stayed on the drawing board until Gmail came around.
"It became very clear...this is what we should be doing,'" Craddock said. "Somewhere along the way, we realized there was probably a lot more money in this free e-mail service than we recognized before."
Off the back burner
Microsoft was early to spot the potential of free e-mail. Back in late 1997, it opted to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to buy Hotmail. But after that, the service remained essentially the same for a decade. Microsoft invested in more servers and additional data centers as the service grew, but Hotmail itself only saw modest, incremental changes.
Although the unit's product changed little, the company did manage to retain some key talent over the years.
Among these people was Reeves Little, who enjoyed the MacGyver-like charge that came from seeing what could be added to the nearly decade-old code. But prior designs required the software equivalent of bubble gum to stick on new features, Little said.
But when it came time for the redesign, code-named Kahuna, Microsoft knew it needed some new in-house blood to augment the Hotmail veterans. (Fewer than a dozen people remain from the original Hotmail team.)
One of the recruits was Mike Schackwitz, who had been working at Microsoft's Redmond, Wash., campus on Internet projects destined to become part of Windows Live. The group program manager said the job, based in Silicon Valley, had twin allures.
One was that Hotmail was the company's single-biggest Web asset. The other was the weather. "Frankly, it rains a lot in Seattle," he said.
A week after he accepted the job, Google launched Gmail. "There was a moment of, 'Oh, yes, this does really matter," Schackwitz said.
While Schackwitz may have been motivated by the California sun, others noticed his move and decided something interesting might be going on at Hotmail. Omar Shahine moved there from the Mac business unit and brought a half-dozen good people with him. Suddenly, stodgy old Hotmail was, well, hot.
By last July, the company had a revamped version ready for the outside world to get its first look. Gone were the check boxes beside each message. In their place, Windows Live Mail offered a layout not unlike that of Outlook, Microsoft's desktop e-mail that lets people preview messages before they are opened and move items by dragging and dropping them into folders.
For years, Reeves Little has been finding ways to shoehorn new features into Hotmail.
"Before this change in thought, it was much more of a MacGyver kind of thing," said Little, who is glad the decade-old code is getting the makeover it deserves.
Little, a fan of Sudoku and other math and word puzzles, has viewed improving Hotmail as just another mindbender. In 2003, the Hotmail team was trying to add the ability to "sort mail by icon," a feature that had become popular in Outlook, Microsoft's desktop e-mail tool. There were different icons for messages that were unopened, had been read, had attachments or represented calendar items.
While Outlook used a whole bunch of rules to process an in-box full of mail, Web-based Hotmail couldn't afford to do that on its servers, given that it had to process hundreds of millions of accounts with billions of messages.
"Initially, people said (we) just shouldn't do it," recalled Little, the lead program manager for Hotmail. But to him, it was just a fun challenge, another puzzle.
He came up with the idea of having the file name of the icon be the code for its sort order. Then sorting by icon was really just stacking messages in a numerical order, something Hotmail's servers could do. And, oh yeah, the file names would be too long on their own, so they should be converted to hexadecimal code.
Little had never even planned on going into computers. His college degree was in psychology, but somehow he ended up at Microsoft after school. "I'll do this until I grow up," he said.
--Ina Fried
Hotmail repairman
Microsoft's Mike Schackwitz works under the hood on the veteran Web mail service.
Changing face of Web mail
Take a look back at the evolution of the user interface.
Preview: MSN Kahuna Beta
CNET reviewers take a look at Hotmail's drastic makeover.
Preview: Yahoo Mail Beta
CNET reviewers take a look at Yahoo Mail's new AJAX-driven service.
Microsoft's ad pitch underpins Net moves
Windows Live offers Microsoft a quicker turnaround
Microsoft aims to take the desktop 'Live'
Microsoft cooking up more features for Hotmail
Microsoft to bring Hotmail onto the desktop
Reaching out to developers with Live
Yahoo busy with new initiatives
Windows Live beta is delivered
Microsoft targets Windows Live Mail at the education masses
Hotmail inventor returns with a fix
Windows free-mail update not so Hot
Yahoo Rolls Out New Web-Mail Service
Yahoo's Amazing Disappearing Mail Servers
One feature which I liked the most is my spam mails have been reduced by a good percentage, now I very rarely get Spam mails.
What they didn't say is that to use the new drag and drop features you have to be using IE or your forced to use the classic interface. I don't see any technical reason behind this Yahoo's new beta works in most all major browsers.
When GMAIL came out it gave me the opportunity to get the exact email address I wanted (and 1 for each of my kids for future use).
From this article it sounds like I should be able to get a new .live one at some point but since I've grown up on web based email the Outlook 'look' does nothing for me.
Therefore...do I leave .gmail for .live for what the article says is basically MS just catching up. Probably not.
It also sounds from the article that MS is going to embed ads (for 3rd parties) into OUTGOING emails...that is something I really would not want to see and I would probably leave .gmail if they started to do that too.
So, in summary, it looks like Hotmail is doing a good job to 'catch up' and that should help MS stay relevant moving forward. I do think, however, that those it lost are probably gone for good.
My 2cents.
BSD, then they changed the outside to windows servers to look like
it was windows running the service. I hear they are using LAMP
architecture for Windows Live.
Typical crappy effort by MSN
Competition where MS plays is a good thing - especially from the likes of Google.
name change is 'gifted' as if this is some kind of advantage.
They gotta be kidding!
Let me get this straight. They change from a snappy, easy to say
name that is far enough removed from Microsoft that many
people don't realize the connection there, to a name that is
harder to say and guarantees an association in peoples minds
with viruses and security flaws.
And it is tied to a browser that is the worst on the planet, then
they think people will swallow ads on their private messages. No
wonder these guys can't figure out why other companies are
doing so well.
Go Google! Microsoft just gave me a reason to get myself a g-
mail account.
When I say features I mean simple things like being able to empty a trash can without tagging every message with a mouse click and then hitting the delete.
This is especially annoying if you receive large amounts of junk mail.
The layout looks like it was "designed" by someone who was given web page layout software for the first time and felt it necessary to put everything on screen at once. It reminds me of when DTP software first started to become popular, and companies would start attempting to design their own literature instead of leaving it to the professionals - which is exactly what Microsoft should do here.
Let someone who knows what they're doing design their websites and mail portals, because they clearly don't have a clue.
Windows Live is probably one of the worst websites I've ever seen in my life.
Windows Live Mail, on the other hand, requires IE and IE only, or else you get "classic" Hotmail.
No contest: as has been happening more and more often, Microsoft is left behind due to its stubborn insistence on rejecting Web standards.
On the plus side the MS changes over the years have been useful when there is time to bother with them.
On the down side some of the animated ads can slow down the browser on a brand new system and for an even slightly older one can make hotmail unusable while the ad is running.
For spam a lot gets through in part because a handful are coming from the ones who pay for those annoying ads on hotmail while many of the others are from MS lifting the original user name restrictions. So now when joeshmoe10000000 signs up for something and joeshmoe1 gets their junk instead because 10000000 missed a few numbers on registering for whatever. (note the pre-MShotmail would not allow the numbers so that there could be only one joeshmoe)
- I tried the Windows Live Beta.....
-
by naddy69
April 26, 2006 3:16 PM PDT
- I tried it for a couple of weeks, and switched back to the old Hotmail style. The useable screen area was absurdly small. Way too cluttered with ads and other useless stuff. Yes I left feedback saying this when I opted out!
-
Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (75 Comments)Perhaps I should try it again, if MS has removed the long ad down the right side of the screen.