Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Miley Cyrus in Sex and the City 2

(continued from previous page)

(continued from previous page)

Hard-core techies loved the new look, with its Outlook-like reading pane and advanced features, such as spell-check. But when the company expanded testing in January to include more of its run-of-the-mill Hotmail users, they hit a snag.

Some like it Hotmail
A significant number of testers liked the old version better. "There was this Hotmail loyalist that loved the check boxes," Schackwitz said.

As many as a fifth of the users in some test groups were opting to go back to the old version.

"It could have completely derailed the train," Schackwitz said.

Instead, Microsoft found a compromise. In its latest build, Microsoft decided to add back a "classic mode" option that essentially stripped away most of the new features. The classic mode uses the new architecture behind the scenes, but to consumers, it looks like the same old Hotmail.

Window Live chart

But adding the classic interface was sort of a sore spot with some of the Hotmail team.

Product planner Sim likens the new experience to a hot tub. For some users, it was just too hot. With classic mode, he hopes longtime Hotmail users can dip in their toe and discover they like the new bubbles, without immediately taking the plunge. So far, plenty of Hotmail users are happy to stick with the warm bathtub afforded by the classic view.

"When they first dip their toe in, it's way too hot," Sim said. "They sort of have to slowly ease their way in."

For Microsoft, if not for all its users, it is definitely time to move forward. A big part of moving to Windows Live Mail is about trying to keep up with Microsoft's faster-moving rivals, the service's development team said.

Craddock said that before Microsoft started Windows Live Mail, it was "taking a fairly long time to do significant releases," noting that updates might take nine months or a year to arrive.

"Frankly, we didn't think we were smart enough to predict what people want a year in advance," Craddock said. Instead, Microsoft's new mantra is to get new ideas out quickly, see which ones stick and then make tweaks on the fly. "We changed the way we develop software. We now ship a new service to the site every eight weeks," he added.

That approach has brought to light some pitfalls--like the need for classic mode--and some unexpected successes. One big hit was the changeable color schemes that Microsoft added to recent test versions of Windows Live Mail.

"It was actually quite low on our list," Sim said. "The product team just really didn't see much value in it."

Users, on the other hand, felt quite differently. "I didn't realize how much I disliked the old one until I changed color schemes," one tester noted.

Hotmail nuggets

Fact: The Hotmail name comes from HTML (the language of the Web) with some vowels added in.

Fact: The Windows Live Mail redesign used to be code-named Tsunami, but Microsoft changed that to Kahuna after the tidal wave disaster in Asia in 2004.

Fact: Hotmail, the company, was originally named Javasoft.

Consumer opinions can be very humbling, Sim said. "You feel like you've got...the best engineers building really world-class software," he said. "When you really begin to get user feedback on it, you begin to realize that some of the assumptions that you have were wrong."

Still, Sim is confident that Microsoft has got it right when it comes to the overall shift from Hotmail to Windows Live Mail.

Removing one of the big graphical ads from the in-box is just one step in an effort to create an e-mail service that people will want to use, Sim said. As it stands now, Microsoft plans to jettison the long skinny ad that runs along the side of the in-box in current test versions.

"A lot of it has to do with...users have grown accustomed to expect that you can scroll vertically," Sim said. Having to scroll horizontally is "more of a pain point."

To recoup some of the revenue from the lost ad, Microsoft is looking to sell advertising that would appear at the bottom of e-mail messages sent using the service. In the past, Microsoft has included its own promotional messages, but Microsoft has had talks with some big-name advertisers about buying that prime real estate.

But even as Microsoft seeks to reinvent Hotmail, its competitors forge ahead.

Since first announcing Gmail with 1GB of storage, Google has more than doubled the size of its mailboxes and worked to integrate Gmail with other services, such as instant messaging. Yahoo, meanwhile, has been testing a mail service update that adds an Outlook-like interface and other advanced features, such as the ability to have multiple e-mails open at the same time.

Microsoft, for its part, has an image problem to overcome, Radicati said.

With Gmail, Google managed to launch a service that is "sexy," Radicati said. Hotmail hasn't had anywhere near the same allure.

"Their image is just that they are free," she said.

Perception is important, Radicati said, since free Web e-mail accounts are largely a commodity business. People often sign up on a whim for a new account, but getting committed users is more of a challenge, she said.

In recognition, perhaps, of its diminished coolness, Microsoft is largely abandoning the Hotmail brand it spent so much to acquire--another big gamble. Existing members will be able to keep their Hotmail.com address, but new users will receive Live.com addresses, and Microsoft will stop using the venerable Hotmail brand to tout the service.

In its place, the mail unit is getting a piece of the Windows brand, something that top executives like CEO Steve Ballmer have made clear is a big responsibility.

"Ballmer reminds us of this all the time," Sim said. "We've gifted you with the Windows brand. Don't screw this up."  

Microsoft's MacGyver

For years, Reeves Little has been finding ways to shoehorn new features into Hotmail.

"Before this change in thought, it was much more of a MacGyver kind of thing," said Little, who is glad the decade-old code is getting the makeover it deserves.

Little, a fan of Sudoku and other math and word puzzles, has viewed improving Hotmail as just another mindbender. In 2003, the Hotmail team was trying to add the ability to "sort mail by icon," a feature that had become popular in Outlook, Microsoft's desktop e-mail tool. There were different icons for messages that were unopened, had been read, had attachments or represented calendar items.

While Outlook used a whole bunch of rules to process an in-box full of mail, Web-based Hotmail couldn't afford to do that on its servers, given that it had to process hundreds of millions of accounts with billions of messages.

"Initially, people said (we) just shouldn't do it," recalled Little, the lead program manager for Hotmail. But to him, it was just a fun challenge, another puzzle.

He came up with the idea of having the file name of the icon be the code for its sort order. Then sorting by icon was really just stacking messages in a numerical order, something Hotmail's servers could do. And, oh yeah, the file names would be too long on their own, so they should be converted to hexadecimal code.

Little had never even planned on going into computers. His college degree was in psychology, but somehow he ended up at Microsoft after school. "I'll do this until I grow up," he said.

--Ina Fried


Images

Hotmail repairman
Microsoft's Mike Schackwitz works under the hood on the veteran Web mail service.

Changing face of Web mail
Take a look back at the evolution of the user interface.

Preview: MSN Kahuna Beta
CNET reviewers take a look at Hotmail's drastic makeover.

Preview: Yahoo Mail Beta
CNET reviewers take a look at Yahoo Mail's new AJAX-driven service.

Related stories
News around the Web
Credits
Author: Ina Fried
Editors: Karen Said, Kari Dean McCarthy
Copy editor: Leslie Katz
Designer: Michelle White
Producer: Kendra Dodds

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (75 Comments)
HOtmail (beta) is great
by April 26, 2006 4:37 AM PDT
I am using the hotmail beta, it is really good,in terms of design, it is better then gmail and yahoo.

One feature which I liked the most is my spam mails have been reduced by a good percentage, now I very rarely get Spam mails.
Reply to this comment
Classic interface forced on non IE users
by bdeonline April 26, 2006 5:28 AM PDT
"A significant number of testers liked the old version better."
What they didn't say is that to use the new drag and drop features you have to be using IE or your forced to use the classic interface. I don't see any technical reason behind this Yahoo's new beta works in most all major browsers.
Reply to this comment
Switching?
by KsprayDad April 26, 2006 5:39 AM PDT
I was a longtime HoTMaiL (see I know what it means ;) ) user saddled with a pretty useless email address...(absoulutely not hotmail's fault...just a victim of its popularity I know)

When GMAIL came out it gave me the opportunity to get the exact email address I wanted (and 1 for each of my kids for future use).

From this article it sounds like I should be able to get a new .live one at some point but since I've grown up on web based email the Outlook 'look' does nothing for me.

Therefore...do I leave .gmail for .live for what the article says is basically MS just catching up. Probably not.

It also sounds from the article that MS is going to embed ads (for 3rd parties) into OUTGOING emails...that is something I really would not want to see and I would probably leave .gmail if they started to do that too.

So, in summary, it looks like Hotmail is doing a good job to 'catch up' and that should help MS stay relevant moving forward. I do think, however, that those it lost are probably gone for good.

My 2cents.
Reply to this comment
About time to change
by groyal April 26, 2006 5:40 AM PDT
10 years is a good time to change. The original Hotmail was on
BSD, then they changed the outside to windows servers to look like
it was windows running the service. I hear they are using LAMP
architecture for Windows Live.
Reply to this comment
Still no Firefox support!!!
by Lite Rocker April 26, 2006 6:26 AM PDT
Instead of worrying about ads, how about making hotmail render properly in Firefox?

Typical crappy effort by MSN
Reply to this comment
Competition
by booboo1243 April 26, 2006 6:58 AM PDT
Here's another element of proof that MS does not make any improvements (don't call this "innovation" yet) in areas where there is no competition.

Competition where MS plays is a good thing - especially from the likes of Google.
Reply to this comment
why no free auto-forwarding or filter forwarding?
by czerwonka April 26, 2006 7:31 AM PDT
Why do none of these stories ever talk about how neither Hotmail/Livemail or Yahoo ever offer auto-forwarding or filters that can forward mail (like Gmail)? I want to hear a straight answer from MS and Yahoo about why they don't do that. Gmail does.
Reply to this comment
You need a 1600x1200 screen
by cocobongo04 April 26, 2006 7:34 AM PDT
With a huge ad on the top and another on the right, even with my 1280x800 screen, the usuable area is down to a small 800x500 area, making the outlook style useless and impossible to use. My PDA device is almost better than the new hotmail. You need a 1600x1200 screen for it to look good and work well. Can't they just to stick to one smaller banner ad at the top?
Reply to this comment
You need a 1600x1200 screen
by cocobongo04 April 26, 2006 7:35 AM PDT
With a huge ad on the top and another on the right, even with my 1280x800 screen, the usuable area is down to a small 800x500 area, making the outlook style useless and impossible to use. My PDA device is almost better than the new hotmail. You need a 1600x1200 screen for it to look good and work well. Can't they just to stick to one smaller banner ad at the top?
Reply to this comment
Right side ad removal is a must
by bjglavin April 26, 2006 7:49 AM PDT
Glad to see the vertical ad is being removed. I realize they have to have them, but the placement of that one makes using the viewing pane a non-starter. That will be a huge improvement.
Reply to this comment
Windoze Dead Mail more like it
by artistjoh April 26, 2006 8:52 AM PDT
I just about choked when I read the line that implied that the
name change is 'gifted' as if this is some kind of advantage.
They gotta be kidding!

Let me get this straight. They change from a snappy, easy to say
name that is far enough removed from Microsoft that many
people don't realize the connection there, to a name that is
harder to say and guarantees an association in peoples minds
with viruses and security flaws.

And it is tied to a browser that is the worst on the planet, then
they think people will swallow ads on their private messages. No
wonder these guys can't figure out why other companies are
doing so well.

Go Google! Microsoft just gave me a reason to get myself a g-
mail account.
Reply to this comment
GUI? So what. More SPAM filters!
by schneile April 26, 2006 8:57 AM PDT
Honestly...who cares about the Hotmail interface? I use MS Outlook Express or VZW with MSN on my cell phone to view my Hotmail emails. What I REALLY want is a serious SPAM blocker and the ability to block more than a limited number (what is it, 35? 50?) of domain names and/or email addresses. Yahoo! Mail does a MUCH better job of this. As a paying Hotmail Plus customer, I am tempted to move to Yahoo! permanently if MS doesn't get its SPAM act together soon.
Reply to this comment
Too little too late.
by Jonathan April 26, 2006 9:43 AM PDT
Its FireFox for me all over again. I've been using G-Mail for so long now the only thing my hotmail account does is catch spam when I sign up for something on the net. At this point I simply don't care.
Reply to this comment
Cluttered and lacks features
by ajbright April 26, 2006 10:05 AM PDT
Actually the original hotmail setup not only has more features, but is less cluttered and has a clean, easy to use interface.

When I say features I mean simple things like being able to empty a trash can without tagging every message with a mouse click and then hitting the delete.

This is especially annoying if you receive large amounts of junk mail.

The layout looks like it was "designed" by someone who was given web page layout software for the first time and felt it necessary to put everything on screen at once. It reminds me of when DTP software first started to become popular, and companies would start attempting to design their own literature instead of leaving it to the professionals - which is exactly what Microsoft should do here.

Let someone who knows what they're doing design their websites and mail portals, because they clearly don't have a clue.

Windows Live is probably one of the worst websites I've ever seen in my life.
Reply to this comment
Two Years Later, Gmail STILL In Beta
by maxwis April 26, 2006 10:19 AM PDT
What is it with Gmail? Two years later and it is still in beta. You can't sign up for it unles you are "invited" by an existing member. This is just silly. Google, either sh*t or get off the pot with Gmail.
Reply to this comment
IE-only features = Failure
by M C April 26, 2006 10:32 AM PDT
I can use Gmail or Yahoo Mail in Firefox or Opera or Safari with full features.

Windows Live Mail, on the other hand, requires IE and IE only, or else you get "classic" Hotmail.

No contest: as has been happening more and more often, Microsoft is left behind due to its stubborn insistence on rejecting Web standards.
Reply to this comment
No Spell Check!
by smvans7 April 26, 2006 10:42 AM PDT
The live beta has no spell-check! Worthless!
Reply to this comment
It's no Gmail
by whirabomber April 26, 2006 11:16 AM PDT
I like the old Hotmail as it was faster, cleaner, and easier to use I could report spam without having to open the email.
Reply to this comment
EARLY HOTMAIL PERSPECTIVE
by menchari April 26, 2006 11:17 AM PDT
I have been using Hotmail since before MS took over. Keeping the "classic" option was a good idea both for long time users like myself but also it keeps things simple to just pop on for a moment.
On the plus side the MS changes over the years have been useful when there is time to bother with them.
On the down side some of the animated ads can slow down the browser on a brand new system and for an even slightly older one can make hotmail unusable while the ad is running.
For spam a lot gets through in part because a handful are coming from the ones who pay for those annoying ads on hotmail while many of the others are from MS lifting the original user name restrictions. So now when joeshmoe10000000 signs up for something and joeshmoe1 gets their junk instead because 10000000 missed a few numbers on registering for whatever. (note the pre-MShotmail would not allow the numbers so that there could be only one joeshmoe)
Reply to this comment
I tried the Windows Live Beta.....
by naddy69 April 26, 2006 3:16 PM PDT
I tried it for a couple of weeks, and switched back to the old Hotmail style. The useable screen area was absurdly small. Way too cluttered with ads and other useless stuff. Yes I left feedback saying this when I opted out!

Perhaps I should try it again, if MS has removed the long ad down the right side of the screen.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (75 Comments)
Previous page
Page 1 | 2
advertisement