- Related Stories
-
Tech beyond black boxes? It just won't fly
August 18, 2005 -
Microsoft to add 'black box' to Windows
April 26, 2005 -
Rocky road for car 'black boxes'
March 9, 2005 -
Photos: Watched at the wheel
March 9, 2005
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says carmakers will need to notify buyers about the recorders.![]()
Photos: Watched at the wheel
The story "Highway regulators: Car 'black boxes' can't be secret" published August 22, 2006 at 6:44 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.







Think of how the dynamic stability systems work today. They integrate information from the wheels, engine, steering wheel, engine, accelerater/brakes etc. to determine when and how to intervene to rescue a vehicle that is careening out of control (try taking your Jaguar/Mercedes/BMW/etc on an advanced driving course and see if you can lose control)
I do however think that the owner of the vehicle should be the only person that can authorise access to the data collected on the data recorder. In this way. One way of ensuring this would be to issue some kind of pin with each new vehicle (similar to in car radios in the late 80's and early 90's). Just as with the pin protected in car radios of the 80's and 90's, a court could order the manufacturer to issue an unlock (over ride) key were the owner unable to issue such a key themselves (e.g. if they died in the accident)
From a purely safety-conscious perspective, I think this is a great idea, especially if the data is to be used the same way black box information is used in commercial aviation (I'm a commercial pilot).
NTSB review of black box data in aircraft accidents consistently shows that most aviation accidents are caused by pilot error. Accidents rarely result from a single catastrophic error, but usually through a combination of bad situations along with a chain of poor pilot decisions. This is often referred to as "the accident chain." If you break a link in the chain, the accident cannot happen. If this is the case for highly trained professionals in a tightly-controlled environment, one can only imagine the situation for the average automobile driver on public roadways.
In this particular case, I think privacy concerns are overblown. Driving on PUBLIC roads is a PRIVILEGE given by the state. Your license OBLIGATES you to follow the rules. If you must drive fast or recklessly, do it on a race track.
If used properly, the data can be used to help a judge or jury know what happened in an accident without having to resort to unreliable witness testamony.
A black box can show that you DID hit the brakes, or that you WERE speeding (or were not). It isn't perfect, but it is something.
Right now a policeman comes on the scene of an accident and except for burned rubber, he has little to go on to determine exactly who is at fault in an accident.
Anyway, that's my opinion.
- Lets just lowjack and monitor everyone
- by qwerty75 August 22, 2006 9:35 PM PDT
- No matter where they are or what they are doing.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(8 Comments)This seems to be where we are going and people like that places like China or Cuba will soon be more free then the USA, even if they don't change any policies.