Version: 2008
  • On GameFAQs: The top 100 most popular games!

August 22, 2006 6:44 AM PDT

Highway regulators: Car 'black boxes' can't be secret

  • 8 comments

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says carmakers will need to notify buyers about the recorders.
Photos: Watched at the wheel

The story "Highway regulators: Car 'black boxes' can't be secret" published August 22, 2006 at 6:44 AM is no longer available on CNET News.

Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
I won't buy it
by guynamedalex August 22, 2006 8:52 AM PDT
The consumer should be have the right to disable this features if they want to, this is way to much big brother watching for my comfort zone. Laws need to dictate that the information can only be given out with the consumers approval. When I go shopping for a new car, and I am, this will be something that helps make my decision of what or what not to buy.
Reply to this comment
You shouldn't be able to disable it
by simelane August 22, 2006 9:37 AM PDT
I don't think that one whould ever be able to disable the controllers. There is more benefit to having some central device in the vehicle receive and aggregate information from a number of other components.

Think of how the dynamic stability systems work today. They integrate information from the wheels, engine, steering wheel, engine, accelerater/brakes etc. to determine when and how to intervene to rescue a vehicle that is careening out of control (try taking your Jaguar/Mercedes/BMW/etc on an advanced driving course and see if you can lose control)

I do however think that the owner of the vehicle should be the only person that can authorise access to the data collected on the data recorder. In this way. One way of ensuring this would be to issue some kind of pin with each new vehicle (similar to in car radios in the late 80's and early 90's). Just as with the pin protected in car radios of the 80's and 90's, a court could order the manufacturer to issue an unlock (over ride) key were the owner unable to issue such a key themselves (e.g. if they died in the accident)
View reply
Avoid buying these cars!
by Des Alba August 22, 2006 9:58 AM PDT
It's just not a good idea to help someone build a case against you or have that information manipulated to serve an insurance company's means to deny claims. This info will be misused. You can bet on that. Don't buy a car with this device in it.
Reply to this comment
Good Idea
by Gasaraki August 22, 2006 10:54 AM PDT
Don't buy cars at all because the most new cars will have the black box in it. Just go back to riding horses. In fact, stay at home and close all the blinds because in any public space, big brother is watching you.
Cars should have black boxes
by Paul Schantz August 22, 2006 1:23 PM PDT
I agree that there is certainly potential for abuse of this data by insurance companies. To address privacy concerns, black boxes in cars should only record information for a limited amount of time, perhaps only one or two trips on a rolling basis. The only time it would actually store recorded data would be in the event of an accident (i.e. - excessive g-load).


From a purely safety-conscious perspective, I think this is a great idea, especially if the data is to be used the same way black box information is used in commercial aviation (I'm a commercial pilot).


NTSB review of black box data in aircraft accidents consistently shows that most aviation accidents are caused by pilot error. Accidents rarely result from a single catastrophic error, but usually through a combination of bad situations along with a chain of poor pilot decisions. This is often referred to as "the accident chain." If you break a link in the chain, the accident cannot happen. If this is the case for highly trained professionals in a tightly-controlled environment, one can only imagine the situation for the average automobile driver on public roadways.


In this particular case, I think privacy concerns are overblown. Driving on PUBLIC roads is a PRIVILEGE given by the state. Your license OBLIGATES you to follow the rules. If you must drive fast or recklessly, do it on a race track.
Reply to this comment
I'm for the black box's
by dstidolph August 22, 2006 2:16 PM PDT
First off, I firmly believe in the privacy of the individual. I believe that a court order should be required before any search of my person or my records - including a black box recorder.

If used properly, the data can be used to help a judge or jury know what happened in an accident without having to resort to unreliable witness testamony.

A black box can show that you DID hit the brakes, or that you WERE speeding (or were not). It isn't perfect, but it is something.

Right now a policeman comes on the scene of an accident and except for burned rubber, he has little to go on to determine exactly who is at fault in an accident.

Anyway, that's my opinion.
Reply to this comment
Lets just lowjack and monitor everyone
by qwerty75 August 22, 2006 9:35 PM PDT
No matter where they are or what they are doing.

This seems to be where we are going and people like that places like China or Cuba will soon be more free then the USA, even if they don't change any policies.
Reply to this comment
(8 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
Click Here

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (-1.48%) -154.48 10,309.92
S&P 500 (-1.72%) -19.14 1,091.49
NASDAQ (-1.73%) -37.61 2,138.44
CNET TECH (-1.01%) -15.99 1,570.23
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right