December 7, 2006 1:53 PM PST

HP settles with California in spy scandal

The California Attorney General's Office said Thursday that Hewlett-Packard will pay $14.5 million to settle civil charges related to the company's now infamous spy scandal.

As part of the settlement, which was first reported by CNET on Wednesday, HP will "finance a new law enforcement fund to fight violations of privacy and intellectual-property rights," and adopt corporate governance reforms, the Attorney General's office said in a statement.

"The Hewlett-Packard incident has helped shine a national spotlight on a major privacy protection problem," Attorney General Bill Lockyer said in a statement. "With its governance reforms, this settlement should help guide companies across the country as they seek to protect confidential business information without violating corporate ethics or privacy rights."

special coverage
HP's boardroom drama
The fallout from the spy scandal continues.

Lockyer said the new fund will help ensure that when businesses cross the legal line, they will be held accountable. He also applauded the company.

"Fortunately, Hewlett-Packard is not Enron," he said. "I commend the firm for cooperating instead of stonewalling, for taking instead of shirking responsibility, and for working with my office to expeditiously craft a creative resolution."

The case is separate from the felony criminal charges that have been brought against five individuals.

HP has said that as part of its effort to unmask the individual who made unauthorized media disclosures, its investigators used false pretenses, or pretexting, to obtain the phone records of more than a dozen people. These targets included journalists, board members and employees. Investigators also followed a board member and two journalists, and the company sent a bogus tip with an electronic "tracer" to a reporter.

In the wake of the scandal, Congress held hearings, and the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office launched investigations. HP also faces a formal inquiry from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as shareholder lawsuits.

No civil charges reported last week that the Office of the Attorney General was considering bringing civil action against HP. But the PC maker said that as part of the deal, the state will not pursue civil charges against the company, or against its current or former officers or directors. (It's not uncommon for prosecutors to file a settlement at the same time as a civil complaint.)

"We are pleased to settle this matter with the Attorney General and are committed to ensuring that HP regains its standing as a global leader in corporate ethics and responsibility," said Mark Hurd, HP chairman and chief executive.

Lockyer's office said the Santa Clara County Superior Court has approved the settlement, which was filed Thursday, along with the civil complaint.

That complaint alleges that HP violated several sections of California's penal code, including one that prohibits "willfully and knowingly" accessing computerized telephone account information without permission. It also cites an identity theft statute that prohibits obtaining someone's personally identifying information and then using that information for an unlawful purpose.

HP did not admit liability as part of its settlement.

Among the other stipulations, HP agreed that for five years, it will:

• Maintain employment of a chief ethics and compliance officer. HP named Jon Hoak to that position in October.
• Expand the role of the company's chief privacy officer to review HP's investigation practices.
• Expand the company's employee and vendor codes to ensure that they address ethical standards regarding investigations.
• Retain an expert in the field of investigations to assist the company's chief ethics officer with regard to investigations.

Of the settlement money, $13.5 million will go into the new fund, while $650,000 will go to statutory damages, and $350,000 will reimburse the Attorney General's Office for the costs of its investigation.

A lawyer for two reporters whose phone records were accessed said HP has yet to provide a full accounting of what transpired.

"My clients are all gratified that the AG's office has gotten HP to take even further responsibility and to pay a small sum of money to the general public to make up for its improper acts," said Terry Gross, whose firm, Gross & Belsky, represents The New York Times and its reporter John Markoff, as well as BusinessWeek reporter Ben Elgin. "But my clients still are looking for HP to provide us fuller information as to the extent of their invasions of privacy."

Gross said that, in a meeting six weeks ago, HP was not able to provide answers to many questions surrounding the investigation. "They promised they would look into these matters and provide us with additional information," Gross said. "We have not received any additional information. We hope they will do a more thorough job of investigating and provide this information to the reporters whose journalistic activities have been threatened."

HP said it has designated new board member, G. Kennedy Thompson, the CEO of Wachovia, as the independent director with responsibility for reviewing and reporting on HP's compliance with legal and ethical requirements related to investigations.

"HP has traditionally been a leader in the area of business ethics, and I look forward to working with the management team to help ensure that the company operates with the highest standards of integrity," Thompson said in a statement.

See more CNET content tagged:
Bill Lockyer, attorney general, settlement, scandal, ethics


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Only three mentions of in the story. Come on, you can do better.
Posted by the kraut (4 comments )
Reply Link Flag
HP Settlement
Another coverup for big business
Posted by fhofmeister (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
What else did you expect ? Money can fix a lot of things, unless the government is stubernishly set on making an example, like with Martha Stewart.
Posted by rmiecznik (224 comments )
Link Flag
Dear fhofmeister
What do you want, blood? Ooooh, the boogy man, BIG BUSINESS.
Posted by mwtrepp (3 comments )
Link Flag
Dear fhofmeister
What do you want, blood? Ooooh, the boogy man, BIG BUSINESS.
Posted by mwtrepp (3 comments )
Link Flag
What about the people?
The State gets money
The Attorney's get money
The actual injuried parties get nothing
Posted by itworker--2008 (130 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I think those law suits are on going
Or at least they would be if I were a lawyer.
Posted by Too Old For IT (351 comments )
Link Flag
It's amazing how a little money directed to the right places can make everything alright.
Posted by logan1337 (22 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Isn't this extortion by the government?
It's just the same tactic that ex NYC DA Spitzer used, threatening to sue, then get the money from the companies, without even going to trial.
Posted by alex_cnet (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
AG Lockyer
Lockyer is a scum bag idiot. Trying to make a name for himself so he can run for Gov.
Posted by mwtrepp (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
spy scandal
I am surprised,considering the amount of business this company could lose.
Can there products be trusted,where the little fish are concerned.
Posted by eaglebeagle (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Appalling lack of the real story
Has no one considered the fact that they were investigating someone who was leaking information to the press, whose privacy was violated first, the corperate leak's or HP's? That same board member is also a board member of a defense contractor, do you think if the DOD got wind of that person leaking DOD info they would not have done, significantly more 'privacy violations' in a government investigation? (Oh that's right the government is expempt from that, they can violate privacy all they want.) That the alleged acts of violation were committed by an outside contracted private investigation company, and there are no clear laws outlawing pretexting in an investigation context? If there are victims in this case it is Patricia Dunn, she was doing the job she was charged with, that needed done, and she got it done. If my employer suspected me or a co-worker of stealing, leaking information, etc. I think they are in their full rights to investigate, using any legal means at their disposal, and there was every reason to believe that this practice was legal, in the course of a legitimate investigation, by licensed investigators. The laws still have not changed, and HP could have fought the case, but what good would that do? It would waste a lot of tax payer time and money and line government and lawyer pockets just the same. Where is the settlement for the violation of HP's privacy? I think the general public agrees considering that throughout the entire thing, HP stock has only increased, the public knows this was a trumped up case. We have yet to see why, but I am quite certian it really has nothing to do with HP, but rather something to do with a precedent being set around private investigations. If all private investigation hands are tied, who then can investigate public corruption? It is even in CNET's best interest that these investigative avenues still exist. If it were any other huge corperation, perhaps I would suspect them as you are, but this is HP, about the last honest world wide corperation left, again and again reported as being the shining example of an American Company. How many years has HP been in business, in how many contries, and this is the best scandal you can come up with?
Posted by chash360 (394 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.