January 23, 2006 4:00 AM PST
HP outlines long-term strategy
- Related Stories
-
Intel scraps once-crucial Itanium feature
January 19, 2006 -
HP discloses strategy for recovery
December 13, 2005 -
HP to acquire identity management firm
November 30, 2005 -
Best Buy looks to expand house-brand products
November 8, 2005 -
HP hires former Dell exec for CIO post
July 11, 2005 -
Hurd signs on as new HP chief
March 29, 2005 -
Fiorina works on 'adaptive enterprise' mantra
October 28, 2003 -
HP pressing for more printer business
October 28, 2002 -
Source: HP board to vote out Hewlett
March 31, 2002
Two weeks ago, HP CEO Mark Hurd, the company's board of directors and senior executives gathered at the computer giant's annual management retreat to discuss long-term strategies.
In marathon sessions that spanned the course of several days at the posh Esmeralda Resort & Spa in Indian Wells, Calif., HP's leadership hashed out HP's long-term strategy. Those in attendance worked from early morning to late evening, with few breaks given beyond meals, said a source with the company.
"By the time the lectures were done at 10 p.m., we were pooped and went to bed," the source said. An HP representative declined to comment on the planning sessions.
According to the source, HP is considering making more acquisitions in the infrastructure software arena. Those acquisitions would include security software companies, storage software makers and software companies that serve the blade server market.
The acquisitions would dovetail with HP's growth plans for its Technology Systems Group, which has already bought companies such as AppIQ for storage management.
Hurd has previously said market trends indicate a movement away from mainframe computers and a shift to blade servers, as well as virtualized storage. HP is likely to follow those trends.
Meanwhile, in HP's Imaging & Printing Group, the long-term plan to develop commercial printers is likely to continue.
"We want to develop the next Heidelberg press," the source said. Of course, HP said basically the same thing back in 2002.
On the chip front, although HP and Intel have had a long relationship involving their collaboration on the Itanium chip, delays by Intel have created frustration in the HP camp, the source said. As a result, HP may use Intel's archrival Advanced Micro Devices as a cattle prod of sorts to the chip giant, the source noted.
"We plan to use AMD's Opteron more and more," the source said.
Opteron competes chiefly with x86 chips such as Intel's Xeon. HP sells ProLiant-brand servers with as many as four Opteron or Xeon processors. However, x86 chips have steadily gained in computing power and overlap in abilities with HP's lower-end Itanium servers.
Intel declined to comment, other than to note that HP has been a very valuable partner, said Scott McLaughlin, an Intel spokesman. Personal Systems Group
One area expected to get an internal technology revamp in the coming year and a half is direct sales, the HP source said.
Last July, HP announced that it had hired Randy Mott, Dell's former chief information officer. Mott, who serves as HP's CIO, previously
See more CNET content tagged:
Intel Itanium, acquisition, AMD Opteron, Intel Xeon, Mark Hurd
8 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
As we installed a new Small Business Server for a customer this weekend, I commented that the customer should now be set for many years since they had more computing power than they will ever require. Our operations director replied, yes except todays equipment doesn't last like it used to and the software companies obsolete their software.
I thought back over the years and the best return on investment that I have seen was the Tandy Model 16 with SCO Xenix. Those machines served the needs of the small businesses I serviced for many years.
What the manufacturers do not realize is the fact that for most small businesses, the technology level we have at this time would be sufficient for many years. The problem is the hardware won't last and the software companies will make the OS obsolete.
Quality and long product life are important. Small business will have more opportunity to develop products and pay their employees better if they do not have to constantly replace low quality systems.
Is the goal of America continued world leadership of declining to a second rate or third world country? The decisions of our government and corporate will decide that fate.
INTEL is hopelessly behind
a. You might have noticed that its Chat support division is now GDPowers certified. Though Dell and HP were in the running for the first company to be certified, HP won it hands down. Dell was a long way off. Dell offers charge phone support except for the one month standard hardware warranty. Other than this it also offers email and chat services, but not many know that it exists. HP on the other hand provided a 90 day free telephone support, a one year hardware warranty, and lifetime free chat support. Lifetime here means that as long as the user wants to use it. If the hardware is bad, ofcourse they make the suggestions for replacement. I personally spoke to a guy by the name Harold, and the guy was great. Also there is a way you can access support for any software you have purchased issues regardless of the make of the system. All you need to do is state that you own a particular model and proceed to troubleshoot. And their suggestions actually work.
b. HP has the edge in the AMD series. With Intel coming out with mediocre processors lately AMD is almost on even kneel with Intel even as we speak. HP has always professed that they would push the products based on the market requirements. And you now know for sure that AMD makes the fastest servers and PCs for 64 bit computing. In fact, I believe Steve should have opted for AMD instead of Intel. (Read <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://sharikou.blogspot.com/" target="_newWindow">http://sharikou.blogspot.com/</a>)
If you notice HP's involvement in the development of the Itanium failure, you would understand why HP is now trying to stay away from Intel.
c. They are cutting down costs rampantly. If you notice their range of Compaqs and the Pavilions, they are focussing on the right product mix and technology. (Features like Lightscribe, media drives (hardware features) are common feature while other vendors provide software features) However it appears that they are cutting down costs by 25k US jobs last year. Wonder how much it would be this year.
By the way, there are a few details you might require to contact HP chat professionals. One would be the model number of a HP system and also you would require. That would suffice for software issues. You would not be able to access support for hardware. There are a lot of procedures required.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://news.techwhack.com/2927/dell-moves-closer-to-possible-amd-based-pcs/" target="_newWindow">http://news.techwhack.com/2927/dell-moves-closer-to-possible-amd-based-pcs/</a>
(Ummm..Probably on track)
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://news.techwhack.com/556/dell-philips-order/" target="_newWindow">http://news.techwhack.com/556/dell-philips-order/</a>
(Big order for Dell)
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://news.techwhack.com/2279/231011-dell-claims-intel-would-dominate-amd-in-2006/" target="_newWindow">http://news.techwhack.com/2279/231011-dell-claims-intel-would-dominate-amd-in-2006/</a>
(Once more Dell bites the dust, but too soon to tell in the servers market)
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.itjungle.com/breaking/bn011206-story01.html" target="_newWindow">http://www.itjungle.com/breaking/bn011206-story01.html</a>
(HP on its way to beat Dell in the AMD market for servers)