August 16, 2006 2:49 PM PDT
HDTV hardware makers fight customer confusion
- Related Stories
-
Next-gen DVD war could be messy--or not
August 16, 2006 -
HDTV is the life of the DisplaySearch party
August 15, 2006 -
Microsoft shows off HD DVD drive for Xbox
August 7, 2006 -
Panasonic to deliver the Blu-ray living room
June 22, 2006
Most buyers and potential customers do not have a firm grasp on what exactly this whole HDTV thing is all about, according to Sony Electronics President Stan Glasgow and Panasonic North America Chief Technology Officer Paul Liao. But both executives say they'd like to help.
At the fourth annual DisplaySearch HDTV Conference on Wednesday, the two consumer electronics executives stressed the importance of educating both consumers and retailers about high-definition content, such as HDTV channel services and next-generation DVD formats, and hardware including TVs and HD DVD and Blu-ray Disc players.
"Some of us have confused ourselves as to what's going on. You can imagine how consumers are feeling," Glasgow told the audience here at the Beverly Hilton Hotel.
He cited a 2005 Consumer Electronics Association study that revealed 20 minutes is the average time consumers will fuss with a complicated product before giving in to frustration and returning it.
Panasonic's Liao said consumers routinely misunderstand the benefits and features of HDTV, such as improved resolution, color and brightness. According to a July survey by Panasonic, one-fourth of respondents thought the purchase of an HDTV automatically included high-definition picture on all channels (not true). About 30 percent who answered said they had no idea what to do with a new HDTV after opening up the packaging. They "really do need a lot of help," Liao said.
Glasgow said Sony has taken steps to combat misunderstanding over HDTV by investing in customer service on the company's Web site and working with retail partners and its own stores. For example, he said, the company allows customers to sample the product in the store before taking it home and figuring out they don't know how to operate it.
Panasonic is also aiming for what Liao calls "extreme customer satisfaction" by offering consumers help on how to better understand its products.
Anyone who buys a plasma display from Panasonic is automatically enrolled in the new Plasma Concierge program. It offers priority customer service appointments to members and over-the-phone consultations.
Liao said that level of personal service is going to be the company's hallmark. This "extreme" approach, he said, will boost the sales of plasma TVs and other Panasonic products.
Glasgow reiterated that their concern should be echoed by everyone in the business with a stake in HD. The best way to do this is to help potential buyers figure out exactly what they're purchasing so that the dreaded "R"-word can be avoided: returns.
"It's up to everybody in the industry to educate," Glasgow said. "In the end, consumers returning products hurts everybody."
See more CNET content tagged:
Glasgow, HDTV, hardware maker, Panasonic, consumer electronics
31 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
However, my neighbors bought a HDTV and found out it's not really HDTV. They had to buy another gizmo to receive HDTV signals! It could display HD, but couldn't receive. What's up with that! Misleading stuff like that will turn off all consumers.
Sometimes it's the stores. They advertise in misleading if not false terminology, and their in store employees are usually ignorant part time college kids. I very seldomly encounter one that knows more than I so asking questions is usually hopeless - often they will say things that are just flat out wrong.
In all I think the manufacturers do a decent job of describing their equipment, but they're not the ones making the sale, and customers aren't willing to spend adequate time researching expensive purchases.
This is a good thing. For those of us who run only a video signal to the TV letting the receiver handle audio and tuning via a cable box etc, why waste money on a tuner that will never be used?
Options are good, but you have to understand them.
From what I hear all the older CRT HDTV hardware is no longer supported without downscaling of the image, and most (if not all) plasma displays are a fraction of the 1080P resolution required for full high definition. Even the 24 inch DELL TFT does not support the HDMI which all high definition signals are going to require.
Anyone looking to use a PC to drive their HD cinema systems right now can pretty much forget it, as almost all video cards on the market are incapable of HDMI
With the recent announcment that Sony's expensive BLU Ray writer is incapable of playing BLU ray disks - as it has no HDMI support... this problem doesn't look like it's going away.
I was planning on being an early adopter of HD when it hits the UK, but from what I've seen so far, it's just a waste of money right now.
What you hear is just not correct. Go do some research before posting any more "facts".
PS You do know that DVI is HDMI without the audio... don't you?
Here is what the customer wants: 1) Their spiffy new HDTV works will all their old stuff. 2) The new HD DVD's, Games, Satellite receivers all work.
Simple isn't it? But with DVI and then HDMI the vendors have created a mess. Have you noticed that all most all new HD sources come with DVI (one of the many flavors) while all the TV/Monitors come with HDMI? You can't plug them directly into each other!!! If I plop down $4500 for the latest HDTV and $300 for the latest satellite receiver, I expect to be able to connect them directly. Instead, I have to get an adapter to convert the DVI to HDMI and come up with SOME OTHER solution for the sound.
The latest stuff should plug into the latest stuff WITHOUT adapters and additional equipment!
I think that the DRM and other issues designed to keep those bad apples from doing bad things is doing to ruin the party for those of us who buy our media and just want to watch some high quality HDTV after a long day of work without getting an electrical engineering degree.
Manufacturers should instead simplify the technology choices and packaging: Get the Blue-Ray vs HiDef DVD act together. Put tuners in every HDTV (no more monitor-only stuff). Throw in a cable package that accentuates HDTV (no more $5 for HDTV cable-card, another $10 for DTV, etc). Throw in a free installation service where a knowledgeable person would install, adjust, and explain. If manufacturers would do these for a year, enough people would understand HDTV to help their friends and neighbors.
1) manufacturers are separate from the cable co's
2) it's upto the cable companies to provide free installation (many already do)
3) cable co's need to provide more HDTV channels
4) if consumers are going to approach HDTV the way they did with programming VCR's, than they will never enjoy the benefits on HDTV. Take a few hours and read the manual or consult a friend who already has a set-up.
Why would anybody try to sell monitors without tuners & without
antennas? Why are retailers still selling about-to-be-obsolete
CRTs right beside the new stuff?
We need HDTV only shops and departments, separate from the
old technology.
Why would anybody try to sell monitors without tuners & without
antennas? Why are retailers still selling about-to-be-obsolete
CRTs right beside the new stuff?
We need HDTV only shops and departments, separate from the
old technology.
Okay, that's true. But what hurts more is consumers not buying the product at all. The article ignores the confusion that consumers are experiencing over what to buy. Others have touched on this in their remarks. And it's not just in the video department: Audio is also in a bit of a mess.
At the end of the day the consumer wants to buy a TV. He doesn't care about HD DVD, std def DVD, HDMI, DTS, 1080i, 7.1 surround sound, etc. He just wants to turn it on and watch TV (presumably a higher quality of TV if he's spend the bucks for a high def video/audio system).
The only thing beyond that he'd like to do is insert a disk. Read that carefully: "a disk". He doesn't care what kind of disk it is. He just wants it to deliver the quality video and audio for which he's paid. No muss, no fuss.
Finally, he doesn't want to enter the store to learn that not only does he require that fancy, $2G plasma set he's been budgeting for, but he'll also need a surge protector, expensive video cable set, new cable service and set-top box, and a new high def DVD player to truly appreciate his new TV. And, BTW, Mr. Consumer, did you know that a 7.1 surround sound system will really make this system good? Somehow, when that happens, you'll feel as if that clerk saw you walking in the door!
Finally: TANSTAFL. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. Nothing .. NOTHING .. referred to in the article comes free. It's included in the price, even for those who are savvy enough to wade through the jargon and set up their own gear. It's silly to think otherwise.
mark d.
variants of resolutions, sound qualities and connections. Last I
checked there are well over 300 possible ways to make a "HDTV"
compatible system.
Just for starters there are the resolutions allowed under the
Grand Alliance HDTV standard (720 x 1280 versus 1080 x
1920).
Then there's the variants allowed for progressively scanned
verus interlaced:
720 can be progressive at 20, 30 and 60 frames per second,
often referred to as 720p (e.g., 720p/20, 720p/30 and 720p/
60);
1080 can be progressive at 24 and 30 frames per second (i.e.,
1080p/24 and 1080p/30) or interlaced at 60 fields per second
(30 frames per second) (i.e., 1080i/30).
There are even manufacturers claiming to support 1080
progressive at 60 frames per second (i.e., 1080p/60) which is
not part of the standard.
To make matters worse the HDTV standard for displays is not
100% compatible with the ATSC standard for transmitting these
signals, e.g., the ATSC standard does not include the ability to
transmit 1080 progressive at 30 frames per second.
Then there are the displays which will accept inputs for 1) 720p
only, 2) 720p or 1080i, or 3) 720p, 1080i or 1080p. However,
there are displays shipping today which will accept both 1080i
and 720p inputs but will only display on the screen 720p (so
while the display accepts signals at the 1080 resolution it will
actually display only 720 resolution). Thus a salesman can
accurately state a display is "1080i compatible" even though
when you get it home it only show 720 resolution on the screen!
All of these variants are allowed to be called HDTVs under the
standard. Additionally, the 1080p/60 variant, while not part of
the standard, is referred to as "HDTV".
Confused yet? And that's only the resolution and video display
part!
Then there's the connections:
HDMI (of which 3 variants are currently shipping [1.1, 1.2 and
1.2a] with a fourth [http://the highly proclaimed 1.3 variant|http://the highly proclaimed 1.3 variant] to start
shipping within the next 3 months);
DVI (of which there are at least two fairly common variants); and
Component.
All of which can be used to provide HDTV inputs to the display.
But to make matters even more confusing DVI is video only and
you have to use the audio parts of the Component connections
to give you sound.
Then on top of this there are the DRM layers on HDMI and DVI.
Some connections on current systems support HDCP and ICT
some do not. Component does not support either HDCP or ICT.
Thus if you use component and the ICT is ever implemented
(currently studios are claiming they will NOT implement the ICT
before 2010 but won't commit to not using it after 2010) you
will not be able to get HDTV over Component connections. What
will you get? That will be 540 x 860 resolution -- which is not
part of ANY standard!
Additionally, most HDTV displays today have both S-video and
coax connections not directly supporting ANY of the HDTV
signals.
Then there are the sound variations which are so numerous (DD,
DD+, TrueHD, PCM, etc. as well as uncompressed, lossless
compressed, lossy compressed) I won't even go into them here.
So combining all the variants there are literally several hundred
different ways you could put a diplay together and still call it a
"HDTV system".
---------
Oh for the good old days of the 1960s and 1970s with NTSC --
525 analog lines -- with a simple 300 ohm two wire connector
(though some TVs had a 75 ohm coax connector too).
One simple signal and one simple connector (sometimes 2).
One other thing you ignored is the difference between HD-monitor and HDTV. HD-monitor can display a HD image (either 720p and above) but does not have a tuner. So, connecting a Coax is not an option. The FCC rule currently says TVs that have NTSC tuner (analog tuner) have to have an ATSC tuner also if the TV is greater than 25" diagonally. This size will drop to 13" next year I think.
Add to this confusion that 1080p is being hyped "the only true HD format"
HDMI is a mess, will be for a couple of more years.
ICT,,,well that could shoot HD-DVD/BRay in the foot,,,this will encourage people to buy them,,,NOT.
Component cables do the job,,,BUT there is no DRM,,Oh me,oh my, what well we do,,,HDMI was the answer. John