- Related Stories
-
H-1B applications for 2006 piling up
August 5, 2005 -
Another H-1B battle coming?
January 20, 2005 -
H-1B visa limit for 2005 already reached
October 1, 2004 -
Senate weighs H-1B visa changes
September 27, 2004 -
Visa program may aid foreign companies
January 14, 2004 -
AFL-CIO calls for reform on temp workers
August 7, 2003
A spending measure approved on Thursday by the Senate Judiciary Committee will boost the number of H-1B visas for highly skilled guest workers by about half--from 65,000 to 95,000.
The proposal would also raise H-1B application fees for U.S. employers by $500, which supporters described as a way to offset spending and avoid sizable increases in the federal budget deficit.
The changes won't take effect unless the full Senate--and later, a conference with the House of Representatives--approves. That may be easier said than done, as the House's version does not currently provide for a change in the H-1B visa cap. The next step for the bill is a debate in the Senate Budget Committee, currently scheduled for Wednesday.
The aim of the H-1B program, launched in 1990, is to keep U.S. companies globally competitive by allowing them to fill voids with skilled professionals from abroad. Under the program, foreigners with at least a bachelor's degree in their area of specialty can remain employed in the United States for up to six years.
Representatives from the technology industry generally applauded this week's move as a positive first step.
The measure "will give U.S. business more ability to compete, succeed, remain competitive and provide new revenue for training U.S. workers and for deficit reduction," said Jack Krumholtz, managing director of federal government affairs for Microsoft, whose chief has called for an unlimited supply of H-1Bs.
But some argued that the proposed increase wouldn't be enough to make a real dent. "My guess is if Congress does approve the 30,000, then those will get eaten up pretty quickly, and we'll be back in a similar situation," said Harris Miller, president of the Information Technology Association of America, which counts IBM, Microsoft and Oracle among its members.
The visa cap hit a peak level of 195,000 between 2001 and 2003 but was cut back to its current level in 2004.
Congress "didn't foresee there would be a continued need for keeping it at that level, but it was very unrealistic to let it go back down to 65,000 when you had 195,000 and all those visas were being used up," said Harry Joe, a Texas-based immigration lawyer whose clients include technology companies that employ H-1B workers. "I think it needs to revert back to what the historic demand has been."
For the past two years, Joe said, the annual limit was met just as the new fiscal year began. Last year, that prompted Congress to approve a boost of up to 20,000 visas for foreigners who receive master's degrees or higher from American schools.
The idea of raising the number of visas has not been universally embraced. The IEEE-USA, which represents high-tech professionals, has criticized the system for taking jobs away from qualified Americans and has suggested that the companies have gotten away with paying less to foreign workers. Chris McManes, the organization's senior public-relations coordinator, said on Friday that the 65,000 number is sufficient.
"It should be a fall-back option for companies who cannot find U.S. workers," he conceded, "but we feel that in most cases, U.S. workers could be found."
See more CNET content tagged:
H-1B, technology company, U.S., worker, Microsoft Corp.






I know it's not that simple, but the "short fall of people with required skills" has been growing for 10 years, and so has the number of H1-B workers. You think if there had been training incentives 10 years a go, companies would still be asking for more H1-B workers?
Great planning folks.
Workers with exempliary records or skills should be given priority.
Foreign workers works much harder
New ideas are given an incentive which gives them a reason to inovate and produce much better products.
Over all I think both H1-B and local workers should be given priority It keeps america on the lead for technology.
costs by using cheap slave labor under H1-B.
The really sad thing is that they haven't
given Congress even 1% of this amount.
The politicians aren't just ******:
They're cheap ******.
Well if you ask me...I enjoy a good hard day at work (just like I did back home), drive a nice German car (a little better than what I used to drive back home), spending some evenings/weekends with friends, socializing, playing tennis, roller-blade, golf, badminton etc. (again just a little different than what I used to do back home), earning a good salary (definitely more than I what I used to back home)...if you call all this cheap slave labor...hey I am not certain, but may be lot of folks out there wish for the same.
Now if you were to argue whether H1-B has been good for America, I think you and me will have a healthy debate.
Not sure, how name calling is helping the argument. And this is true for folks on both sides of the aisle.
<me>Hard working H1-B worker from India</me>
People on H1 have to be paid the prevailing wage, i.e., the same as Americans.
of work. Wake up, your job is next.
I work with 1 offshore team in Manila & 1 in Mumbai. ALL of those people take money out of the US and pay NO US taxes. But anyone on an H1B comes into the US & pays taxes - do y'all want foreigners taking American jobs & paying US taxes - or foreigners taking American jobs & paying NO US taxes - pick one.
---
From my recruiter:::
The not so good news is we have not seen a good flow of qualified candidates for the QA or Server Engineer positions. Besides the lackluster response on our postings, we have sent out emails and left vm's for candidates we have in our database but have not received response. I did check with another recruiter, XXX YYY who is currently working for a software start-up and he said the Software Engineer and QA positions he is working on have been difficult as well, seems, good technical folks are employed and not actively looking. They decided to go the college route and are doing H1 Visa for candidates with Masters only for the Software position.
If you can't fight them, be with them.
As to the claim of slave labor: in the application process, they must disclose their salary information, and it must be at least the median to be approved. Thus, if they were going to be paid slave wages, they would never have been granted the visa.
As for the claim that what is chiefly need is more training of existing citizens: having been a researcher at a large engineering school, I can attest to the fact that the vast majority of native born citizens only wish to learn as far as it provides vocation. It follows that, most of the people sitting in the labs are not US-citizens.
The remedy to this situation is not to simply pay for more post-secondary education, rather our cultural attidutes need to change to elevate continuous study above fashionable consumption and consumerism, if the United States wishes to engages in protectionism as some are insisting that we ought to.
It's a form of discrimination.
There are more layoff this year in the high-tech area than there were last year. Yet there on no cheap (bachelors degree) H-1b visas left.
We don't need any more h-1bers, industry hasn't even used up the more expensive H-1b visas (those for master degree from a U.S. university).
H-1ber's then proceed to encourage companies to move jobs overseas.
The value of the dollar is plummeting and soon Americans will be living like the 3rd worlders who work for food. When will Republicans get it? A good economy needs good jobs.
Try getting a database designer to work on operating systems...
A good economy indeed needs good jobs. That's why we need more people who can work in these jobs. If companies can't find these people, their only option would be to outsource the jobs to some other country. Getting more H1s into the US keeps the jobs here in this economy.
As for the H1s for people with Masters degrees, it seems you have forgotten that college graduation is in summer...
DOL enforces it, and has fined companies.
Referring to illegals in this context is just a red herring. Stick to the topic, please.
"prevailing wage" clause, and the complaints
were rejected on the grounds that I did not
have standing to make the complaint.
The logic is that only the H1-B immigrant
himself or a person who can PROVE that they
were laid off or were otherwise _directly_
affected is allowed to complain.
In other words, it's a scam. The whole thing
is just a run-around designed to waste
your time.
Regarding claims that it's a "myth" about low
pay for H1-Bs. Read the case files:
http://www.lca.doleta.gov/
http://www.flcdatacenter.com/CaseH1B.aspx
The format isn't as convenient as it used to
be, but you'll find that thousands of H1-Bs
in the software industry are being paid $24k,
and that hundreds of thousands are being
paid less than $40k. So, no, it is not a myth.
If you read the actual LCA forms, it becomes
quite evident that nobody in the US government
cares to enforce the "prevailing wages" law.
-dave chapman
There is no requirement that you have to be directly affected.
Oh, and quoting some salary figures without the actual job description is of course completely meaningless.
Again, I cannot condone tricking kids into a field with no future. Now, if the kid had an MBA and a couple of courses in IT so they could specialize in managing offshore workers, there might be a future (read: a future with growth potential) there, sure. A business analyst? Maybe.
But doing the technical work, be it development or system administration? I'm not cruel.
And IT professionals don't make just 30K. If you float such numbers, you really have no clue. People at MS, at Oracle, at Sun making $30K? Give me a break. Good people make $100K without problems.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/25/44OPreality_1.html
?Abuse is by far more common than legitimate use,? he says.
- Sure it is.
- by imric1 October 26, 2005 11:38 AM PDT
- More assertions, no facts, not even an anecdote. No studies, no research, just words that contradict experiences common to those folk that really work in IT.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Facts
- by JoeF2 October 26, 2005 10:10 PM PDT
- The "stufy" compares the average salary of CS people in California with the average salary of people on H1.
- Like this
-
(56 Comments)It's clearly not worth continuing this discussion.
I call on all readers to actually read his posts, and the posts he responds to, and ask yourself these questions - WHERE are his facts, WHAT is he trying to accomplish, and WHO is he trying to convince?
First off, there are quite large salary differences between Silicon Valley and other areas of CA.
Second, the "study" doesn't say if the people on H1 are actually working in CA or somewhere else. Salaries in other areas of the country may differ quite a bit from salaries in CA.
As I said, the "study" is comparing apples and oranges. It is sad that you apparently weren't able to understand that without me going into the details.
It is a classical thing of how to lie with statistics. Undergraduate Statistics 101 class...