- Related Stories
-
A long winding road out of beta
February 11, 2005 -
Google News faces Microsoft rival
July 27, 2004
Google News, still in its test or "beta" phase after launching in 2002, says it will let people specify what categories of news to display on the page, giving an array of choices including results chosen by keyword.
"We've made a number of improvements to Google News that allow you to customize your News front page by creating sections that focus on topics you care about, for instance, your favorite sports team, technology, or celebrity," reads a Google News page posted Wednesday. "You can also design your custom front page by mixing and matching existing standard sections from the 22 regional editions of Google News from around the globe."
On its launch three years ago, Google News upped the ante for news aggregators like Yahoo News by automatically collating a worldwide array of news sources. In July, Microsoft responded with a news aggregator of its own that highlights customization options.
A test version seen by CNET News.com wasn't yet functional. Attempts to customize a Google News page failed, with all commands yielding a "Google Error" page that read "Not Found: The requested URL...was not found on this server."
A Google representative said the new system was still in testing but would launch with full functionality later Wednesday night before an official announcement Thursday.
In Wednesday's tests, Google News started displaying a customization box listing its normal news categories. Above the box, the site read, "Drag to rearrange page. Click to edit."
Google News readers will be able to create up to 20 sections for their custom page. The customization relies on cookies, or files a Web site places on the visitor's computer to store identifying details and preferences for subsequent visits. Readers can also distribute their customized setting via e-mail.
See more CNET content tagged:
Google News, Google Inc., section, Microsoft Corp.






- Rocker Partners counter claim
- by September 27, 2005 10:41 PM PDT
- Below is a copy of the anonymous Letter to W.Bush,et.al.,as it appeared on February 8 in the Washington Post.<br /><br />It was found on www.ahandup.us google search and<br />the original website may or may not still exist.I know that site seemed mainly about erroneously claiming the Canadian-Nevada penny stock CMKM Diamionds was a victim of'naked short selling' rather than the trillion share pump and dump it was and is.<br />K<br />evin West's intro to the Washington Post letter to W.Bush et.al. of February 8 also says Bob O'Brien has a grievance with Rocker Partners,<br />perhaps predating Overstock.com's Parick Byrne's perceived grievance.<br /><br />This distinction is important to note because since the news.com aricle I am responding to was written,Rockers Partners has vowed to counter sue and names the anonymous Bob O'Brien of NCANS as a co-defendent. <br /><br />What does this $100,000+ letter-ad to W.Bush in the Washington Post on February 8 have to do with the Rocker-Overstock dispute ? <br /><br />A lot,because this was the firing of the first official volley by Patrick Byrne in his war against Rocker Partners,yet ironically it is is<br />decrying 'naked short selling' as a danger to SS investing in markets,a claim made so far in mass only by about 100 very questionablre,perhaps criminal penny stock companies whose managements all have in commom hiding their float from investors,staing untold illegal pump and dump scams and possibly even money laundering !!! <br /><br />I have already given my reasoning all over the internet as to why I believe Bob O'Brien is in fact James Dale Davidson of the National Taxpayers Union,newsmx.com,and the now disappeared NAANSS or National Association Against Naked Short Selling website.Mr.Davidson as well as Texas attorney John O'Quinn and for that matter used the erroneous claim that Endovasc of Montgomery,Texas a was 'naked shorted' by Charles Schwab,Refco,and Ameritrade.<br />James Dale Davidson and gang housed Genemax and <br />the NAANSS organization in the same Blaine, Washington office !!! There is every reason to believe Genemax nor Endovasc were'naked shorted'<br />at all but were really illegal pump and dump ops<br />and in fact there is proof 'up to 30 million share' of Endovasc' was deposited into one Charles Schwab account !!!<br /><br />Those interested in more detail may do a 'schwab lom endovasc davidson clinton' google search.For those interested in attorney Texas attorney O'Quinn and his part in the naked short claims <br />of fraudulent penny stock Endovasc do a google of 'attorney o'quinn money laundering'.<br /><br />Tony Ryals <br /><br /><br /><br />Below letter to Washington Post by NCANS as well as a comment from Patrick Byrne's own website where he acknowledges his involvement with ncans<br />and the Washington Post letter.<br /><br /><br />Sample Letter<br /><br />Hello, my name is Kevin West from Universal City, Texas.<br /><br />The article attached below was posted in the Washington Post over a week ago and was addressed to the President of the United States, George Bush. This article was run as a very large article and ran in prominent places in the Washington Post on February 8th and 10th. Why is the media afraid to do an article of their own concerning this issue? <br /><br />I don?t understand why, in the midst of National Security issues, Social Security issues and all of the Economic issues that this great country of ours faces today?. Why would a paper, with the national and international attention your paper receives, why would you not cover this story? As American citizens we DEMAND that our media bring these issues to the American Public. Are we not worthy of getting the news that government officials and Wall Street insiders know and have known for a long time? <br /><br />You have to see this as one of the absolute BIGGEST NEWS STORIES to hit our country in recent times, and yet you do not care to publish it? If you cannot see the bigger picture of helping to get America?s markets cleaned up to help stabilize our economy, at least look at all the extra papers you will sell and the national and international exposure your paper will get from publishing this story! What happened to PATRIOTISM that the ?FREEDOM OF THE PRESS? allows you to have? We fight for the media?s rights everyday in this country. Now take the time to fight for your country!<br /><br />All of America is counting on you, stand up to the plate!<br /><br />Respectfully,<br /><br />Kevin M. West<br /><br />An Open Letter on <br /><br />The Abuse of Naked Shorting<br /><br />February 8, 2005<br /><br />George W. Bush, President of the United States<br /><br />William H. Donaldson, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission<br /><br />Chuck Hagel, Chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Securities and Investment<br /><br />Richard Baker, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises.<br /><br />Dear Mr. President and Honorable Chairmen,<br /><br />As Congress considers incorporating private investment accounts into Social Security, it is essential that equity markets be fair, transparent, and not subject to flagrant abuse.<br /><br />Unfortunately, illegal naked short selling is rampant in the markets today. It has been permitted to flourish unchecked, doing serious damage to the market value of many sound businesses, and is literally stealing money from the widows, retirees, and other small investors who purchased stock in these companies.<br /><br />Naked short selling has been illegal since 1933, when the SEC was established. It was banned because naked shorting resulted in significant abuses that contributed to the crash of ?29.<br /><br />That the problem still exists today is undeniable. The SEC recently enacted Regulation SHO (for SHORT selling). The Regulation creates a list of companies whose stock has been sold but not delivered in significant amounts. "Naked" short shares have, in effect, been counterfeited. They are as different from normal short shares as fake money is from real money. The ability to print counterfeit shares at will allows a hedge fund to destroy a company?s value over time by creating an artificial (and fraudulent) supply of stock. If this were cash, computers, or jewelry, the perpetrators would be behind bars. Yet apparently the rules are different for Wall Street?the SEC, the NYSE, and the NASDAQ exact no meaningful penalties, thereby allowing the practice to continue.<br /><br />Though the recently instituted Regulation SHO Threshold list informs investors on a day to day basis which stocks are experiencing "failures to deliver" (i.e., naked shorting), it does not disclose the size of the failures?the public has no way of knowing whether they are in the thousands or millions of shares. The DTCC (Depository Trust Clearing Corporation), the NYSE, and the NASDAQ, who compile the data and publish the list, won?t tell anyone how big the problem is. Yet there is no rule or regulation that prevents them from making that disclosure. <br /><br />Shareholders deserve to know how many fraudulent shares exist for every security on the Regulation SHO list. By withholding the one piece of information that could level the playing field between the public and naked short sellers, the regulators are hurting the public by protecting the violators.<br /><br />To make matters worse, the regulators charged with protecting the public are not only failing to enforce the rules on the books, they have decided to "grandfather" the "fail to deliver" violations that existed before January 7, 2005. This is like letting bank robbers keep the proceeds from their past robberies, while warning them that there will be toothless penalties if they rob the same bank again. To repeat?naked shorting has been illegal for 70 years. <br /><br />The chief violators are unprincipled hedge fund operators who take advantage of the absence of meaningful penalties to target smaller companies. The brokerage community and the DTCC are complicit, as brokers receive a commission for every naked share traded and the DTCC receives a fee for every phantom share borrowed. The losers in the equation are the shareholders and the companies, who are defenseless against this systemic gritt.<br /><br />Why is this lawless predation on the investing public not only condoned, but also rewarded by excusing all pre-January 2005 violations? Who benefits other than the violators? Who is being shielded? Where is the consideration for the millions of unsuspecting investors seeking to supplement their retirement income?people who innocently rely on a "level playing field?" Where is a Congressional Oversight Committee? Where is the media?<br /><br />Most importantly: how can private accounts be made part of the Social Security system when such flagrant abuse and manipulation of the equity markets goes on?<br /><br />What must be done:<br /><br />We have no quarrel with legitimate short selling, which can serve a valid and useful function in the markets. But as a group of shareholders who own some of the stocks on the Regulation SHO Threshold list, we call on the SEC and our elected officials to put a full stop to the illegal, abusive practice of naked short selling. The following four actions are essential at a minimum:<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />1) Enforce the existing rules. No exceptions. No looking the other way. The rules were written to protect the public by preventing naked shorting. Enforce the rules with meaningful penalties and prosecutions. <br /><br />2) The DTCC and the Exchanges must disclose the number of shares that have not been delivered each and every day, for each company on the Threshold list.<br /><br />3) Eliminate the grandfathering of existing undelivered stock sales. Enforce the buy-in provisions on ALL naked short positions, not just the latest violations.<br /><br />4) Demand accountability for how this breach of the public trust occurred, and fix the problem rather than covering it up. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />There is no excuse for allowing a group of predators to fleece the public and victimize sound companies for their own profit. This is one of the rare problems that can be solved quickly, easily, and at no cost?except to those who have abused the rules. The SEC has to stand up to the community it is supposed to be regulating, enforce the law, and eliminate the grandfathering of violations that occurred prior to an arbitrary date in January. <br /><br />Until the illegal abuses in the markets are corrected, private investments in Social Security cannot be considered secure.<br /><br />Sincerely,<br /><br />NCANS ? The National Coalition Against Naked Shorting © 2005<br /><br />www.NCANS.net<br /><br /><br /><br />A WORD FROM PATRICK BYRNE :<br />Update<br />Posted Feb 16, 2005, 12:13 PM<br /><br />Obrien posted my long strand from last night all in one (logically sequenced) order over on www.ncans.net . <br /><br />I recommend you read there, along with the following: <br /><br />1) The ad we took out in the Washington Post: <br /><a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.ncans.net/files/NCANS%20WPost%20Ad.pdf" target="_newWindow">http://www.ncans.net/files/NCANS%20WPost%20Ad.pdf</a> <br /><br />2) My letter concerning Carol's article: <br /><br /><a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.ncans.net/byrneinterview.htm" target="_newWindow">http://www.ncans.net/byrneinterview.htm</a> <br /><br />And Obrien's deconstruction of Herb Greenberg: <br /><br /><a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.nfi-info.net/herbfeb10.htm" target="_newWindow">http://www.nfi-info.net/herbfeb10.htm</a> <br /><br />Patrick
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(4 Comments)