April 27, 2005 11:38 AM PDT
Gates wants to scrap H-1B visa restrictions
- Related Stories
-
Can the U.S. still compete?
April 15, 2005 -
H-1Bs now open to the less-educated?
March 10, 2005 -
Labor group: Techs tops at courting foreign workers
January 26, 2005 -
Another H-1B battle coming?
January 20, 2005
"The theory behind the H-1B (visa)--that too many smart people are coming--that's what's questionable," Gates said Wednesday during a panel discussion at the Library of Congress. "It's very dangerous. You can get this idea that the world is very scary; let's cut back on travel...let's cut back on visas."
Federal quotas on H-1B visas, capped at 65,000 last year, have long been a sore spot for Microsoft and other technology companies. But, Gates said, the increased caliber of research institutions in China and India means that curbs on immigration and guest-workers will pose a greater threat to America's competitiveness than ever before.
Gates' comments verged on sarcastic. He said that "it's almost an issue of a centrally-controlled economy versus" and then trailed off. "I'd certainly get rid of the H-1B visa caps," he added when asked what he would do if he could write U.S. laws. "That's one of the easiest decisions."
Princeton University's president, Shirley Tilghman, also warned of increased competition from abroad--and took aim at the federal government's aggressive denials of visas to foreign students after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Students are "not coming in the numbers they used to," Tilghman said.
The number of foreign students dropped in 2003 for the first time in more than 30 years, the Institute of International Education estimated last fall. It attributed the decline to increased competition from foreign universities and far stricter visa rules.
"I think there was a post-9/11 effort to cut down on visas," added Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat. "I think this was a mistake."
Rep. David Dreier, a California Republican, was left defending stricter immigration rules. "We can't be so naive as to think there is not a very serious problem" with terrorists entering the country, he said.
Microsoft Research head Rick Rashid gave the example of a Microsoft employee in China who was barred by the U.S. government from attending a meeting in the United States after she got married. Gates said even Canadian employees have received similarly poor treatment: "It doesn't make any sense. We'll have Canadians sitting on the border until some bureaucratic thing happens."
"scrap H1Bs". A major difference.
Information Technology at the university level in the US is not deep enough. There is no specialization other than in most Computer Science programs which are typically PROGRAMMING HEAVY. Designers, Analysts, DBA, System Engineer, and Network Engineers should be able to specialize and receive a Bachelor's degree in those specialties. Having to then go through the expense of specialized MS, CISCO, CompTIA such programs is too expensive and prohibitive. Find ways to incorporate those or create comparable curriculums or we lose.
It just seems that companies want the quickest bang for the buck and don't care who does it for them.
Just my 2 cents....
Should New York not let people from Connecticut work there in order to create an incentive to better educate New Yorkers? Both NY and CT would be poorer places.
that they are going to miss out on if they are going to cap the
amount of students coming in to the country. I welcome US
students and tourists to the UK with open arms and a friendly
attitude, they help the UK economy and I work with a couple of
people from the US and they're really great at keeping you
motivated and staying positive. I think the US should be more
liberal in allowing people into the country, without being
careless, and for once I would agree with something Bill Gates is
trying to do, which helps both foreign students and their
respective countries + the US. Hopefully there will be a good
compromise on this issue.
I don't blame the foreign student or workers. They are simply trying to get a job. I blame the guys like Bill Gates getting rich off of cheap foreign labor. If Indian/Russian/Chinese programmers demanded the same wages as their American counterparts, there would be no demand for them at all.
Now the MS conspiracy theorists will claim that I've been fired from my "paid" position as a MS supporter. LoL... ain't free thought great?
workers seems to be saying they will work for 1/3 the wages,
work longer hours, etc. etc. Put another way, you are saying
they should cap the number so companies have to hire lazy,
overpaid Americans? Yep, that will help the economy.
He wants an army of people who can point and click to create easy to create but hard to maintain bloat ware applications.
Why? To sell more of his products and to drive down his development costs.
All I can say is GO LINUX!
Foreigners hired under the H1B program have to get paid the same wage as Americans. There is no undercutting. If a company violates the rules, anybody can complain to DoL, and they fine the company that violates the rules (and yes, this has happened.)
Furthermore, it is very shortsighted to believe that only Americans are smart. If qualified people are denied H1B visas, they will just compete against us from their home countries. So it is in fact in the interest of America to have these people here.
If not, I consider that just another uninformed rant.
If you have evidence for your claims, why don't you report it to DoL? This is the form: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/forms/whd/WH-4.pdf" target="_newWindow">http://www.dol.gov/esa/forms/whd/WH-4.pdf</a>
I have every interest to see abuses of the H1 program stopped.
But, my main point stands: the H1 program is very beneficial to the US.
Without the H1 program, the smart foreigners just compete with the US from their home countries. And they have an advantage if they would: the cheaper labor in their home countries.
So, if you want to see the US prosper, you actually should be in favor of more H1Bs.
occasions to hire people on Visas that were cheaper than the
U.S. counterparts. They altered the job requirements to hire
those people specifically when there were definitely equally
qualified U.S. citizens. There was a legal spit about it, but one of
the people went back to India, and the other ended up dying of
cancer shortly after he was hired.
With the number of U.S. IT workers who are unemployed it is
absolutely indefensible to support bringing in more foreign
workers. I have friends who would gladly take a cut in pay to get
a job today, but the jobs are going overseas or being filled by
H1B's so that Mr. Gates' and his friends can crank up their stock
values.
H1s have to be paid the same as Americans. So, there is no cheap labor involved. The cheap labor is only coming into play if jobs are sent abroad.
So, if you are against cheap labor, you should actually be in favor of more H1s.
Provide your evidence. The only thing that happened is that the inflated salaries of the dot-com era are gone. Anybody who could read a VB book or who could spell "computer" got a job during that time. These excesses are over. Nowadays, you actually have to have knowledge about this stuff, and can't "wing it" anymore.
DoL actually enforces the laws regarding H1s.
Again, eplacement by cheap labor is against the law. So, if you had a real claim, instead of whining here, you should file a complaint: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/forms/whd/WH-4.pdf" target="_newWindow">http://www.dol.gov/esa/forms/whd/WH-4.pdf</a>
It's amazing the time and energy you've must have put in to do your job well and then poof! Gone!... It's very frustrating and terrible especially if you can't get a job in the field you've been in for a while. And by the way, insourcing for Americans (insourcing is Americans working for Indian firms) doesn't happen. Try getting a job with their firms. That's reality. I hope you've found another job. Kitlist.com, Dice.com and Techworkers.com
there are countless articles showing data the point to this trend.. like this one: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://news.com.com/2100-1022_3-5659116.html" target="_newWindow">http://news.com.com/2100-1022_3-5659116.html</a>
it is painful, as an american myself, to admit that the problem here is that we are no longer the single source of the absolute best and brightest.. but it would be a form of denial to simply blame this entirely on varying engineer personnel costs.
It is a fallacy to think that the only smart people are in the US. I fully expect India and China being big players in the next 10-20 years. If the US even wants to have a chance, we need to take and keep every qualified foreigner we can get. If they work for us, they don't work for our upcoming competitors.
Reality is the world has shrunk; it is not possible to compete in a geographically isolated cluster. When a country decides to close its doors to imports, through several channels the US asks kindly for the country to open to imports. Remember the pressures on Japan? It is not only impossible, but also undesirable; Japan stagnation is rooted in its seclusion.
So, the US nation has to decide whether an impossible coalition of left wing unionized workers and right wing isolationists we-love-fox-news is going to undermine its competitiveness. I would suggest to stop winning and get real. If you dont swim faster, Bangalore will outpace Silicon Valley. Who knows, maybe your kids will be denied a working visa for India or Brazil in 50 years&
Once I finish my masters at the best technical university here in US, I have to decide if I am going to sell my skills here or abroad. And quite frankly, if things get a little too complicated, not only finding job, but also fighting some of the prejudices expressed on this list, I will leave. The funny thing, I studied for free& So, are you going to use me or should I benefit another country?
BUT, I do agree with Mr. Gates that H-1B should be abolished to help Microsoft. Maybe if Microsoft was able to hire more foreign workers they could fix all the security holes in their products, charge less for their products, and ship them on time.
- Mohan
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.garamchai.com/mohan" target="_newWindow">http://www.garamchai.com/mohan</a>
I just have the better arguments...
Is it needed when ANY work is sent outside the U.S.?
I'm a bit confused. If it is my first question, then there is no complaint to be made. Companies can replace their workforce with whoever they'd like. If my second question is true, then there would be a legitimate complaint.
Maybe I am just way off target.
To prevent salary undercutting, the law requires that the employers pay at least the prevailing wage to these people.
Like with every law, there are of course some unscrupulous employers who violate the law. These employers should be reported to DoL so that they can be fined and forced to pay the required salary.
But the vast majority of companies follow the law. It just doesn't make economical sense to risk a huge public backlash and PR disaster for a couple thousand bucks in saving.
So, the theory is - an H1B visa means a foreigner taking the job from a US citizen. BUT, they will be paying US taxes, spending money on accomodation, transport and food - all money going into the US economy. By comparison, a job outsourced to India means no US taxes and no money spent in the US economy - but reduced labor cost.
But a quote from Bill Gates (on cnn.com) he said "Anybody who's got good computer science training, they are not out there unemployed,". This does get me angry - my job has gone offshore twice in 3 years. I write IBM mainframe software & after 25 years, I think I'm pretty good at it. They don't even teach much COBOL here in the US, these days. But I cost too much. I can reduce my rate to break even on the bills for a moderate sized house & car & nothing else and I STILL can't compete with someone in India.
I've not worked since July last year & right now wonder if selling up & retiring to a tent in the desert might be a good idea.
Now to clarify some things with H1B. First and foremost only degree holders and above can apply for H1B, or sometimes exceptionally talented workers. I have to go through a series of interviews with both my present employer and the US consulate to get the visa. It's not just simply handing an H1B to anyone, I have to compete with other H1B applicants due to the quota set to my country. The next stage is for my employer to prove that my skill is exceptional and not available locally. It took 5 months, certification from a US university to validate my degree and experience, and a few thousands $ to finally get the approval.
Is it worth it? My employer seems to think so. I have met many H1B holders and we all have somewhat similar experience getting here. I guess what I'm trying to say is we are not just the average workers, we earned to be H1B holders because of our skill. This may not be all true, but I can guarantee you that most of us are.
For the record, my average working day is 12hrs.
(I'm sorry for any grammar/spelling mistakes.)
At my previous company the pay-rate was about 25% less, I was a develepor but classified as technician. Why? because classifying me as a developer/programmer would mean that the company I was working for (a major multinational company) would have to admit that anyone who is dedicated can program even without a college degree.
Look, I am a successful programmer, without a college degree.
Admitting that (a person without a degree can program) would mean that my company which was hiring H1-b's (as anything techs, programmers, you name it) at 30% less than what I started making at my new job, would have to open up the job search to everyone.
And also, before my first permanent job, 10 years ago, I applied to Microsoft with no response. At the same time another temp I was working with landed a job at Microsoft, and came back to the office about a month later. Everyone asked him, how did you land a job at Microsoft? His first words were, "You see I have a friend at Microsoft who..."
Note: When I was looking to switch jobs I applied twice to Microsoft, again no response. That make 3 times.
Look Bill, friends hire friends. Your not able to find programmers because people who apply are being rejected until someone's friend needs a job.
For Microsoft this all makes sense because, the major benefit of having friends in the office is that you can sand-bag. Microsoft is a company of sand-baggers, and tsunami of open-source is coming (sorry for the tangential comment).
What Microsoft needs is to really open up the hiring process and stop this cronyism.
What Bill is saying is totally at odds with the facts of the "new" outsourced-economy and the realities of how people get hired at Microsoft.
Half the developers I know have been laid off in the last five years, most are still unemployed.
You are definitely a condescending snob, if you really believe what you are implying.
I don't write spaghetti code.
My code has to pass rigorous review of other developers, before check-in. It doesn't get checked until the review is complete.
ITS ALL ABOUT CHEAP HELP!!!
do you honestly think that microsoft is going to hire cheap labor to help them introduce new technologies and compete? haha. get off the bandwagon.
"Foreign Workers Coming to a Cruise Ship Near You
Outsourcing" which has become synonymous with sending American jobs to India or China could soon mean foreign workers sleeping in ships just a few miles off America's coasts. In an outrageous affront to U.S. labor laws, a California company plans to anchor a 600-cabin cruise ship just beyond the three-mile limit off the coast of El Segundo, near Los Angeles, and stock it with foreign software programmers. The company, SeaCode, will seek to classify the workers as "seamen," avoiding U.S. payroll taxes and the need for immigration visas."
I guess you will find some excuse for this too.
I guess you will find some excuse for this too.
The statistics are from a former news.com article itself.
By using a callback, I reduced the sort time to milliseconds. I that's an excellent example of design efficiency which I implemented.
This is just one example (of thousands) of cases where I have saved the 2 companies that I have worked for time and effort over the last 10 years.
By calling me a "programmer" (or with a programmer mentality) you are trying to turn me into a strawman, one that you think you can easily crush. It just shows you a flame-baiter, several people have already commented on this, about you, in previous responses.
I have designed several API's, GUI's. Designed several class libraries. Led a development team in the creation of server project.
I am software developer at my current, and I am paid very well. Really that says it all.