- Related Stories
-
New MIT Media Lab head roots for grassroots
February 16, 2006 -
PCs for the poor: Which design will win?
February 15, 2006 -
Will the $100 PC fly?
February 10, 2006 -
The $100 laptop moves closer to reality
September 28, 2005 -
The $100 PC: How do we get there?
November 12, 2004 -
Ballmer: We need a $100 PC
October 20, 2004
Computer intended for developing countries is being developed with the backing of rival Google.
The story "Gates mocks MIT's $100 laptop effort" published March 15, 2006 at 6:25 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.






- MIT needs a wake up call
- by rdupuy March 16, 2006 7:23 AM PST
- I love the $100 laptop project, because it shows how in a networked world, brain power from remote areas can be used, improving that economy and greatly expanding the internet.<br /><br />On the other hand, MIT thinks you sell a million units to government for distribution to the poor, because they still think the world works that way... big governments making social engineering moves.<br /><br />It strange how they can be simultaneously so bright, and yet so completely out of touch with what the internet really is, and why it works.<br /><br />But nevertheless... the $100 computer will be a reality, it just won't be MIT's baby. It will be a used computer on e-bay that now goes for $100.<br /><br />Power...yes, for god's sake build some power generators in Africa... that would be a great idea for big government types to spend their money on.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Provocative, I hope.
- by rdupuy March 16, 2006 8:00 AM PST
- Africa's poverty is in need of a permanent solution.<br />And that means, not just meals today, but an infrastructure for the future.<br />An educated population, a computer using population, is certainly part of that.<br /><br />But when you give a $100 computers to a family that isn't sure where the next <br />meal is going to come from, there is going to be a temptation to sell that computer.<br /><br />Negraponte's venture is a detailed one, with many things being thought out in detail...<br />but while his technical approaches can be brilliant, his administrative approach<br />I see as a kind of big government top down approach.<br /><br />To solve the problem of the recipient largely just selling off their computers immediately,<br /> he thinks, how can I lock down this system, so its valueless except to the owner.<br />(HINT: if you cannot sell it, you aren't really the owner...but he doesn't get that).<br /><br />So, then this system of locking it down gets hacked, and gets hacked again...and <br />then continuing along this line of thinking, people like him start to say to themselves,<br />after all the government bought it with public resources... so time to take firmer action.<br />(HINT: how many people will go to jail for trafficking in illegal $100 laptops in Africa).<br /><br />For all his detailed analysis, he hasn't made an estimate of how many african's he expects to <br />be in prison as a result of this intiative. But thats big government types, they operate<br />in this vacuum where they can calculate the good, but all costs are just dismissed.<br /><br />In the true spirit of the internet, a libertarian approach is what is needed.<br />If you give someone something, they own it. It's theirs. They can sell it if they want.<br /><br />Thats treating people with respect. But they won't sell it. there is a libertarian answer<br />to that problem to: make the laptop more valuable to own, than to sell.<br /><br />The libertarian thinks of the economy, and how, that brain power can be utilized, thereby employeeing africans<br />so they can feed their own family,..using them as content creators wherever possible and benefiting the whole world for this new resource.<br /><br />No, its not perfect...and I understand, for some reason this project is about giving things to children,<br />rather than employeeing the adults...and that itself is folly. Employee the adults, then they can pay<br />for all kinds of education. I do not know why, and am quite frankly a little tired of the endless<br />ignoring of adults in need, and focusing on their children, as if adults are worthless. They are not.<br />Children will do very well, to have an adulthood they can look forward to with anticipation.<br /><br />I am fond of the technology solutions of the MIT project, but deeply concerned about their approach to administration.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (123 Comments)