It was a move that also offered Gates a golden opportunity to prove his critics wrong and show that he was every bit the technologist his resume claimed he was. To be sure, Microsoft has always been touchy about suggestions that it is less of a technology innovator than a technology follower.
Few sane people would dispute the contention that Gates is the most successful business mogul of the last 50 years. But when it comes to rating his talent as a code jockey, will history render a similar judgment? Any time the subject is Gates, the debate is bound to turn radioactive. But passions aside, there's now enough evidence with which to reach an interim opinion. Let's consider the highlights.
Internet Explorer
After Microsoft bested Netscape during the Internet browser wars of the late 1990s, IE ruled the roost. With the game over, Microsoft also lost any incentive to make the product substantively better. And after the U.S. Department of Justice failed in its bid to break IE off of Windows, Microsoft had even less motivation to get cracking. But the technology business doesn't stand still for long.
If Microsoft needed a wake-up call, the rapid emergence of Mozilla's Firefox browser in 2004 was it. If Microsoft dawdles much longer, the number of users downloading IE alternatives in 2005 will turn into a stampede.
.Net My Services
I'll bet a week's wages that most folks have no idea what .Net My Services was supposed to be. Don't feel too bad--neither did Microsoft. Originally code-named HailStorm, this was a grab bag of cool-sounding Internet-based services that Microsoft likened to a digital safe-deposit box to host personal information.
This was a complicated idea that was surrounded by confusion right from the get-go. Just as bad, Microsoft couldn't figure out how to make it pay for itself. The project, slated to debut in 2002, has since been shelved.
Longhorn
Microsoft originally planned to ship this next major version of Windows by 2004. Now the company says it will ship Longhorn sometime late in 2006. Even more embarrassing, Microsoft won't be able to implement its highly touted WinFS file system with the release of the operating system.
The excuse being offered is that, well, Longhorn is complicated. Besides, Microsoft poured an enormous amount of resources into shipping its SP2 security patch. All that may be true, but it doesn't change that fact that Microsoft let this project sprawl out of control. Meanwhile, the Macintosh operating system and Linux continue to advance apace.
Security
Talk about a self-inflicted black eye. Microsoft took an eternity to figure out how to respond to the vulnerabilities in its software. But even after the release of SP2, problems continue to surface. All this raises inevitable questions about process and oversight. How can a company look a customer in the eye if it can't vouch for the security of its products? Microsoft's glass half-full argument that things are far better still doesn't cut it.
Search
Years after Google soared to supremacy, Microsoft now has a beta version of the Web search technology it will ultimately offer--sometime. Gates promised that Microsoft would have something ready by the end of 2004, but the world is still waiting to see the beef.
Even when it comes to desktop search, terrain where Microsoft should dominate, Google's out ahead.
When the historians take his measure, Gates may ultimately be remembered most for the importance of his philanthropy. Considering the impact of what he's doing in the sphere of disease prevention through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, there's clearly a case to be made.
But when it comes to his talent as a technologist, the track record tells a different story. It is beyond contestation that a lesser mortal would have been sent packing long ago.
Biography
Charles Cooper is CNET News.com's executive editor of commentary.
- Lack of innovation???
- by May 23, 2005 3:23 AM PDT
- What do people mean by innovation? Is it how many bells and whistles it has? Is it based on how original the idea was? NO. Innovation is something that changes society; that improves mankind. Microsoft is innovative because they have used EVERY business tool available to blow the competition out of the water. Hey, in the business world, ideas cannot be patented. You cannot claim you thought of something first and have it stand up in court. In the business world, an idea is no longer yours the second you make it known. The fact that Microsoft is able to take someone else's idea and make it into something great makes them a great company. Gates is a great leader from having taken a small bunch of nerds into the biggest software company on earth. Microsoft reaches into the lives if each and every person in the US, and most of the world. <br /><br />I am not a Microsoft employee, nor am i an MVP, nor is my company a MS partner. My company, and I for that matter, use everything Microsoft. No other company has such a complement of differenet technologies that ALL WORK TOGETHER. I can, from anywhere in the continental US, access any piece of business data with my company from my Pocket PC, with Pocket Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or IE. I can connect to my corporate network, built using ASP.Net, SQL Server, Active Directory, all running on Windows 2003 Server. Out corporate Intranet can, using native ASP.Net technology, manipulate Excel spreadsheets, e-mail them through Exchange, and manage them via the very intelligent resources available on Server 2003. Yes, there are other companies offering other technologies that may be able to do the same thing. But MS works, and they have everything the modern business needs to compete.<br /><br />Now lets talk about Open Source. Innovative, right? After all, the licensing model is considered to be something revolutionary, bound to change the world, right? I don't think so. When my software breaks, who do I go to? Who do I call? Who is accountable for the development of Linux? The fact of the matter is, no one. No one can be BECAUSE of the license. So how does that make Linux better?<br /><br />If people are claiming that real innovation has to be original ideas, then fine. Microsoft is not innovative. I say innovation is what Microsoft does with its software. .Net is faster than Java, both in development and execution; Windows is more readily available, easier to install, is SUPPORTED, and there is more software available for it; Office is the easiest-to-use office productivity collection ever; the list goes on.<br /><br />So, my point. Microsoft is innovative because they've changed the world through their products. And Gates has been leading the way since Microsoft and the software industry began.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(44 Comments)