February 21, 2007 5:27 AM PST
Gates: 'Vista's had incredible reception'
- Related Stories
-
Vista for the masses
April 4, 2007 -
Microsoft to drop back on spending growth
February 15, 2007 -
The foundation that Bill Gates built
June 15, 2006
Microsoft founder responds to comments from CEO Steve Ballmer that analyst forecasts for Vista revenue were "overly aggressive."
The story "Gates: 'Vista's had incredible reception'" published February 21, 2007 at 5:27 AM is no longer available on CNET News.
Content from Reuters expires after 30 days.
44 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment (Log in or register)
This is the two top execs at Microsoft contradicting each other.
People have been questioning some of Gates' public statements of
late and this is just more fodder for the notion that he is out front
and out of touch.
It's one thing to spin and another to be dizzy.
:)
2. not credible; hard to believe; unbelievable:
-from Dictionary.com
unreasonable expectations with regard to Vista.
Most people, even at MS (if you read the
employee blogs), were on board with Vista being
nothing to write home about. Certainly IT folks
worth their salt knew how it would be received.
Gates is pointing out that Vista is selling lots
of discounted Windows XP-based PCs (as has been
reported int he press) -- and he's tickled that
some of them even wanted a copy of Vista. Who
would have expected anyone to want Vista?! Not
MS, certainly, so there you go -- it *IS* and
"incredible reception".
What are you running now ? Exchange 2003 ?
lol
Exchange 2007 will only be available in 64-bit (only), a 32 bit version was made, but it is unsupported and for internal MS use and some special people might get it.
So that server you got, guess what, if it ain't 64-bit, it gotta go and it only supports selective 64-bit CPU from AMD and Intel, the older 64-bit Itanium processors are not supported at all.
And that's just 1 of 100 supprises that you will be told about or maybe not :- )
But anyhow how many servers sold in the past 3 years does not support 64bit?
If you are a firm that will upgrade to 2007, you most likley are on leading edge so most likley will have the hardware to support it.
If you are like others you may be running one version behind. And thus this has not effect on you.
Microsoft sells hundreds of copies of Exchange each year...maybe thousands. The upgrade cycle for going to a new Exchange platform can be anywhere from 3-7 years. Lots of companies sat on Exchange 5.5 for a very long time and only moved to Exchange 2003 (by passing Exchange 2000) because MS was dropping support for it after 9 years.
Any company wanting to move from Exchange 2003 to 2007 has not problem upgrading to 64bit CPU's....heck most probably are running Exchange 2003 on 64bit capable servers since both Intel and AMD have been selling 64bit CPU's for more than two years...and most people moved Exchange 2003 in the last two years.
Besides the major advantage of Exchange 2007 being 64bit....is Exchange server consolodation with real support beyond 4gigs of ram and 4CPU's....they moved to 64bit because the customers wanted it.
Man the CR@P on this site that is stated.
week, it is clear that The Chairman exists in a bubble. His awkward
behavior on The Daily Show, walking off stage before they could
get to commerical, his confused ranting against Apple, OS X and
Jobs, and this most recent statement suggests that he does not
wield a reality distortion field, but a reality ablation field.
DrDreg
www.drdreg.com
usage simply won't do.
ablation |??bl? sh ?n| noun
1 the surgical removal of body tissue.
2 the removal of snow and ice by melting or evaporation,
typically from a glacier or iceberg.
? the erosion of rock, typically by wind action.
? the loss of surface material from a spacecraft or meteorite
through evaporation or melting caused by friction with the
atmosphere.
Are there issues? sure are, and who are these people with issues? Nvidia with poor driver support? a 680 chipset released to fast with MB manufactures scrambling to keep people from cooking there ram on 680i boards? the 8800 video card which is having issues left right and center with vista driver support really poor?
Or is it the people trying to instal iolo after seeing on there site VISTA compatible!! then buying the software and finding out they can't even install it. So they install it on there XP box only to have there AV software scream about the rootkit SM7 installs?
Or is it the people with a system that meets the low end of the spec requirement and then try and run the top end of the product and go *** why can't I run this?
Or is it the MAC people saying who needs to upgrade? I just install my CD on any mac and bingo. So yes I brought my old MAC I in, and plunked it on my APPLE fans desk and asked them to install it. No? Okay I then grabed my 1997 Vintage power mac and install it? No? ahh okay I understand.
Stangley though, company who are selling new PC's with Vista installed are seeing a sales surge? Why? many people held of PC purchases and waited.
This is the same trend we saw earlier.
And for all the screaming from our AV friends, who made a fortune runing on the Microsoft cloak, wow stangle every single one of them has releaed Vista compatible software.
Oh wait you mean your Direct Downloaded Atari Vintage games don't run with the open gl emulator, becuase your ATI or Nvidia driver has a sub note saying Open GL support limited at this time?
No, maybe its I can run my games on my Linux box on wine its easy. Well yah I know the sound screws up, yah I know my mouse vanishes from time to time, yah I know I need to redo my wine configuration on each game patch...
No I swaped out my video card on my Linux box and now I can't load my KDE. Or was that wait my linux kernal only has a 128k foot print no KDE3 or Gnome loaded stripped down..
Wait no its Novell is pushing Linux!! oh wait what happened with Wordperfect? you know the once all mighty wordprocessor? Wait IBM is pushing linux... wait its HP thats surging in the Server field..
No its LINUX has a 25% market share.. no wait thats 25% of the new server install market.. hmm who is grabbing the rest.. no wait Microsoft is eroding.. wait, they had increased growth in the Desktop and Server OS field..
Wait.. I forgot where I am posting..
Personally, I'm still not buying a new system until 08, and may not get Vista even then. The games out there, aren't going to mandate Vista for awhile, I use no apps that need it, and if I want the MS version of all the free gadgets I get already.....wait I don't.
Billy's ego prevents him from shutting his mouth and dealing with the foundation he should be focused on.
XP is working great for me right now. I choose to wait until Vista crosses the release speed bumps and not budge until SP1 at the least. I was going to purchase a new computer early this year but the release of Vista convinced me to wait until it has a service pack released.
Rocco
All Vista is in XP with features they copied from Apple and Google like Desktop Search.
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://pack.google.com/intl/en/pack_installer.html" target="_newWindow">http://pack.google.com/intl/en/pack_installer.html</a>
largest CompRetailers, and every machine from every company on
the shelf IMMEDIATELY switched their pre-loads to ME. Not only
that, we were directed to offer "free upgrades to ME, while you
wait".
What a nightmare that was!!!
By the way, I already was running Ubuntu in my machine, after Vista's setup my grub boot dissapeared, so I went to IRC, to ubuntu channel, and bam, 15 minutes and my problem was solved, that's support.
Last night, built a machine for a client, installed Vista Home Premium. He more than meets the specs for Aero graphics but couldn't get them to work.
Most of the motherboard drivers were instantly rejected by vista and replaced by automatically.
So the client has a killer gaming rig with home basic graphics.
He asked, "Is it too late to get XP?"
Don't bother me with 3d, just give me an operating system that works right and doesn't crash.
I am running XP Pro, preinstalled on an IBM product and I can't tell you how many times I have to hold down the power button because XP froze up the machine completely.
MS can blame the hardware and the applications all they want, BUT, it's still the OS responsibility to manage the show.
In the past weeks, I tested many OS on my laptop as a project for a charity.
As far as stability, performance, and adaptability, the winner was (surprisingly to me) ... Ubuntu 6.10 with Beryl.
Evolution connects to Exchange server with no problem and is a worthy replacement for Outlook (even opening someone else's calendar, working with Exchange rules, setting up delegates and out of office, etc.)
OpenOffice works better than expected and no-one knows if a document hads been created or updated by Office 2003 or OpenOffice 2.1
Sound and Wireless connectivity work flawlessly.
Printing is very good.
Although I am an XP and OS.X power user (I even tested OSX86, which is very nice), uBuntu blew them away. I am as shocked as everyone else...
PS: Solaris 10 is really really nice. I was quite impressed, actually. But their version of Evolution does NOT play well with Exchange, Firefox does NOT play well with Java (which is funny really), and the sound and wireless drivers are not up to scratch.
CNET about Vista:
"Windows Vista Ultimate.
Windows Vista is essentially warmed-over Windows XP."
"Windows Vista Home Premium is essentially warmed-over
Windows XP Home Edition. If you're currently happy with
Windows XP SP2, we see no compelling reason to upgrade."
"Windows Vista Home Basic is essentially warmed-over Windows
XP, Windows XP SP3. If you're currently happy with Windows XP
SP2, we see no compelling reason to upgrade."
"Windows Vista Business is essentially warmed-over Windows XP.
If you're currently happy with Windows XP SP2, we see no
compelling reason to upgrade."