January 13, 2008 10:01 AM PST

GM invests in 'trash to ethanol' start-up

Related Stories

Cellulosic ethanol: A fuel for the future?

August 14, 2007
Related Blogs

GM CEO: U.S. needs 10 times more ethanol stations

January 8, 2008

(continued from previous page)

Nearly all ethanol today is made from corn or sugar cane. Ethanol advocates say that cellulosic ethanol, made from wood chips, grasses, agricultural residue, and other wastes, is more environmentally sound and doesn't compete with food sources. The Department of Energy is funding about 20 cellulosic ethanol trials, and the recently passed energy bill mandates that by 2022, 20 billion out of 36 billion gallons a year of biofuels come from non-corn feedstocks.

Rather than use specially designed enzymes for fermentation, Coskata uses naturally occurring micro-organisms it licensed from the University of Oklahoma to make ethanol.

GM's investment is part of a second round of funding, which was originally backed by venture firms Khosla Ventures, Advanced Technology Ventures, and GreatPoint Ventures.

Its process starts by putting carbon-based materials into a gasification chamber where heat and pressure turn feedstock into syngas, a combination of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide.

That gas combination is then scrubbed to remove particulates and then moved into a bio-fermentation vessel where micro-organisms metabolize the syngas and turn it into ethanol.

Its process is flexible enough to work with a range of renewable sources, including grasses, wood chips, and even old tires. The company says its bioreactor uses plastic tubes, rather than dropping the entire mixture into a single tank, to maximize exposure to the microbes, a design which keeps overall costs down.

"Our calculations indicate that for virtually any carbon-containing feedstock handled in large bulk, we will be able to convert it without subsidies at under a dollar a gallon," said Coskata President and CEO Bill Roe, who added that current processes are about twice as expensive. "We believe that's what's going to drive consumer interest."

Coskata has a water-recovery step that allows it to use less than 1 gallon of water for each gallon of ethanol produced. That compares to 3 to 5 gallons of water per gallon of corn-based ethanol.

Roe said that Argonne National Laboratories measured the "energy balance" of its process and found that it can produce 7.7 times as much energy in the end product as it takes to make it. Its fuel produces 84 percent less carbon dioxide than gasoline, when measured from production to use.

Those numbers compare favorably to switchgrass, an experimental ethanol source. A recent multi-year study from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that switchgrass contains five times the energy required to grow it and produces 94 percent less greenhouse gases.

Coskata, named after a nature preserve near Nantucket, Mass., is one of several racing to bring cellulosic ethanol to market cost-effectively.

"It really points to the potential for this family of technology to be large-scale and really environmentally beneficial," said the NRDC's Greene. "There's a much higher probability of success through this shot gun approach."

Previous page
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
General Motors, sedan, Chrysler, Ford, vehicle


Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Nathanael Greene's out of touch
If Greene thinks that GM's dual hybrid, flex fuel, E-flex game-changer and Saturn plug-in are greenwashing, he deserves to be ignored by anyone
interested in the environment. He's obviously one of those innocents brainwashed by the fictitious documentary about the EV-1. Just ask him his opinion of the EV-1 and I suspect that will verify my suspicians that he's anti-GM.
Posted by theBike45 (90 comments )
Reply Link Flag
E85 in all Vehicles?
If GM was so big into biofuels, why don't they put Flex Fuel engines into all their vehicles? The actual cost to modify the computerized fuel injection system at manufacturing time is under $100. It's too bad the kickback from the oil companies for not putting in Flex Fuel compatible engines have more to do with "greed" than simply trying to be "green".
Posted by joehohn (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
No, But Several
From the web site e85vehicles.com:

* Chevrolet Impala 3.5L & 3.9L
* Chevy Express 5.3L
* Chevrolet Uplander 3.9 L
* Chevrolet Silverado 5.3
* Chevrolet Avalanche 5.3L
* Chevrolet Suburban 5.3L
* Chevrolet Tahoe 5.3L
* Chevrolet Vans 5.3L
* GMC Yukon 5.3
* GMC Sierra 5.3L
* GMC Savanna 5.3 Liter
* GMC Savanna 5.3 Liter Cargo Van
* GMC Yukon 5.3L

As usual, crooked anti-green GM is not doing enough. Just look at Toyota's E85 list:

* [empty]

OK, Toyota's list may be empty, but they did create the Prius ... the green-messiah of automobiles. Hence everything they do is more green and wonderful by association.
Posted by open-mind (1027 comments )
Link Flag
Not much of new
some Latin-American countries use ethanol car since the 1960s and almost all new cars are flex-fuel since about 2004. But it's good to see other countries using it and making it better...
Posted by Someone-else (183 comments )
Reply Link Flag
5 Reasons to Buy an electric car
5 Reasons to Buy an Electric Car
Submitted by nhayssen on Thu, 01/31/2008 - 14:52.
1. Zero Air Pollution
ZAP stands for Zero Air Pollution. We believe electricity is the fuel of the future. With electricity to power our transportation, our world can tap into renewable resources like hydroelectric, solar, wind, or geothermal power; resources that lessen our environmental footprint. Furthermore, studies show that millions of electric vehicles can recharge at night using existing surplus electrical generation; a vast, virtually untapped resource.
2. Save Gas
Gasoline is a precious natural resource and vital to the world economy. ZAP vehicles use no gasoline and require no oil changes. Using less fossil fuel can help relieve our current energy shortages while ensuring that future generations can rely on the same inexpensive, useful, petroleum products that we all take for granted.
3. Save Money
Gas keeps getting more expensive. Imagine all the money you can save by ZAPPING to work every day, rather than driving your gas vehicle. The typical electric car costs a penny per mile versus ten cents per mile with gas. Electric bikes and scooters are even less expensive. Plus, electric motors have fewer moving parts, meaning fewer trips to the mechanic. If you live close to work, you can save thousands of dollars per year by replacing your car with a ZAP bicycle.
4. Save Time
Traffic congestion and parking shortages eat away at our busy days, but a ZAP vehicle can help you save time, especially in busy urban areas. ZAP bikes and scooters slice through traffic jams and finding a place to park your ZAP neighborhood car is a snap.
5. Help the Economy
Today, the majority of USA's foreign trade deficit is attributed to imported oil. Using a ZAP vehicle will reduce our reliance on foreign oil. Furthermore, by investing in advanced transportation technologies, the USA can take the technological lead in offering energy efficient products that emerging economies around the world can use to build their own transportation infrastructures.

For more information on buying an Electric Car go to: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.zapworld.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.zapworld.com</a>
To view the ZAP Xebra Electric Car click here: <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.zapworld.com/electric-vehicles/electric-cars/xebra-sedan" target="_newWindow">http://www.zapworld.com/electric-vehicles/electric-cars/xebra-sedan</a>
Posted by zappedone (16 comments )
Reply Link Flag

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot



RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.