May 20, 2004 11:01 AM PDT

Free-software group says no to SCO

A leading free-software group has vowed to fight portions of a request to release information that could help the SCO Group in its legal battle against Linux.

In the latest twist in SCO's closely watched $5 billion lawsuit against IBM, the Free Software Foundation has said it does not plan to turn over certain internal documents and communications with key open-source proponents, as SCO had asked in a subpoena.


Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


"I'm not going to permit a fishing expedition at the Free Software Foundation from a party that has shown a great deal of hostility to the Free Software Foundation and its community," FSF general counsel Eben Moglen said on Thursday. "We will not produce material that is the subject of attorney-client privilege, and I don't think anybody expects us to."

SCO sent the eight-page subpoena last November, but it was on hold for procedural reasons until April, and the FSF did not publish it on the Web until this week. It asks the nonprofit group for information about e-mail and records of conversations between its staff, FSF founder Richard Stallman and Linux kernel creator Linus Torvalds, about the enforcement of free software licenses and the vetting of source code to ensure it's not intellectual property. The subpoena also requests copies of any contracts or agreements the foundation might have with IBM, Red Hat, SuSE and any other "Linux distributor or company."

Moglen said that he was negotiating with SCO's lawyers and hoped to persuade them to narrow their request. "I will fight if compelled," he said. "I do not expect, at present, not to be able to reach an agreement. But I always expect to be able to reach an agreement with people acting in good faith."

SCO is taking a wait-and-see approach. "We believe their materials have some relevancy to our case. They mention, for example, that they have confidential documents relating to Unix, and we would be really interested in that," SCO spokesman Marc Modersitzki said. He noted, however, that until SCO reviews what the open-source group divulges, it's difficult to predict what role the information might have in its lawsuit against IBM.


Flashback
News.com's related coverage of
SCO?s claims against Linux

SCO sues Big Blue
over Unix, Linux
(March 6, 2003)

SCO: Unix code
copied into Linux
(May 1, 2003)

SCO targets
Linux customers
(May 14, 2003)

Torvalds: What,
me worry?
(July 8, 2003)

Red Hat files
suit against SCO
(Aug. 4, 2003)

SCO sets Linux
licensing prices
(Aug. 5, 2003)

SCO attacks open-source
foundation
(Oct. 28, 2004)

Novell offers legal
protection for Linux
(Jan. 13, 2004)

SCO sues Novell
over copyright claims
(Jan. 20, 2004)

SCO suits target
two big Linux users
(March 3, 2004)

Court orders SCO
to show more code
(March 3, 2004)

Document shows SCO
prepped lawsuit
against BofA
(March 4, 2004)

Red Hat seeks to
reawaken SCO case
(April 20, 2004)

AutoZone wants SCO case
put on hold
(April 27, 2004)

DaimlerChrysler: Dismiss
SCO suit
(April 29, 2004)


SCO rattled the computing world in March 2003 when it filed a lawsuit against IBM, a case that has expanded to target AutoZone and DaimlerChrysler as well. SCO, based in Lindon, Utah, claims ownership of key Unix copyrights and alleges IBM moved Unix technology to Linux, thus violating its Unix contract with SCO. The company has since gone on to seek licensing fees from other Linux users.

IBM, however, says it believes it has a perpetual and irrevocable right to use Unix. Founded in 1985, the FSF is dedicated to promoting free software--meaning software that is distributed in an open-source manner under a license that means it must stay open--and is the coordinator of the GNU project. The operating system known as Linux relies on a wealth of GNU components.

"This is a broad subpoena that effectively asks for every single document about the (General Public License) and enforcement of GPL since 1999. They also demand every document and e-mail that we have exchanged with Linus Torvalds, IBM, and other players in the community," Bradley Kuhn, FSF's executive director, said in a letter written Tuesday and published on the organization's Web site. "In many cases, they are asking for information that is confidential communication between us and our lawyers, or between us and our contributors."

The FSF's Kuhn added that as SCO's lawsuit against IBM drags on for more than a year, his organization will have to make some tough decisions on how to answer the SCO subpoena and the potential costs involved if his group fights it. The foundation receives the bulk of its funding in contributions from individuals.

CNET News.com's Stephen Shankland contributed to this report.

1 comment

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Poor choice of words...
The teaser text on the main page makes it sound like the story is about the FSF resisting the release of information that might help SCO in its fight against Linux.

What's really going on is that SCO has an overly broad subpoena (READ THE FREAKING SUBPOENA) that asks for everything the FSF has communicated with everyone concerning the GPL. 1) Fishing. 2) A burden on the FSF to produce literally everything they've e-mailed since 1999. 3) Fishing. 4) There's not going to be anything in that information that helps SCO's case anyway. 5) Fishing. The text makes it sound like the information might help SCO, but it is highly unlikely that the FSF's information will help SCO's case.
Posted by rdean (119 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.