A former director at Borland Software detailed his call for a change in how the company maintains its board of directors.
Robert Coates, a former board member who continues to own what he calls a large number of shares in the company, issued a statement Friday outlining and reemphasizing his push to have the company's stockholders play a larger role in appointing directors. In late 2003, Coates filed a proxy that proposed that Borland's board members should be elected annually by the company's shareholders.
Borland representatives did not immediately return calls seeking comment on Coates' latest statement.
Coates maintains that Borland CEO Dale Fuller and other board members have done an insufficient job of guiding the maker of integration, management and software development tools. Despite posting a first-quarter profit of 5 cents per share in late April, the company reported that it has had trouble closing deals with customers and said it expects to report a net loss for the second quarter of 19 cents to 21 cents per share, including a restructuring charge. Borland's second quarter ends in June 2005.
Reached by phone, Coates said Fuller has placed too much blame on regional sales managers for the company's earnings shortcomings, and he said the executive has not taken enough responsibility for the situation. Coates also blamed Fuller for what he called excessive turnover of employees at the company and called for the ouster of former Borland Chairman William F. Miller, who remains one of the company's directors.
"As Borland's CEO, Dale Fuller has consistently ducked responsibility for his own repeated failures to execute and refuses to take responsibility for the performance of his own management team," Coates said in the statement. "Instead, he has repeatedly blamed the very people he hired and initially expressed confidence in for Borland's setbacks while simultaneously being rewarded with lavish stock option grants and compensation above the industry average."
Coates claims that his proxy won an overwhelming victory among Borland's shareholders in 2004, at which time the company's board proposed a second vote on the issue. The results of that vote will be tallied and announced next week at Borland's annual shareholder meeting on May 13.
In February, Borland introduced a revamped product line in hopes of giving software developers a suite of interlinked tools tailored to the specific tasks they do. The move follows similar strategies employed by the company's rivals, specifically IBM and Microsoft, which are also building tool suites for teams of programmers.
Borland have the high quality development products that could have turned them into a market leader.
Unfortunately, Borland's dismal management record, including a full blown name change and backtracking to the original name and countless mistakes have turned their main product Delphi into a pricey "boutique" programming language despite it's inherent qualities.
As a Delphi coder, I'm appalled by such a waste of energy and talent.
Bring back the "good old" Borland, with the "no nonsense" licensing scheme, a price tag for entry versions (legally usable !) designed to attract more coders, and the return of the kind of inspiration that led to Delphi 1, more than 10 years ago !
Web giant is spending $120 million to beef up its Mountain View, Calif., headquarters, according to filings with the city reviewed by the San Jose Mercury News.
The Samsung Galaxy Mini 2 S6500 could make its debut at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona later this month, according to a leaked promotional image.
MIT creates a simulation to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Spacewar. A relic of the early days of minicomputers, it was one of the first computer video games and set the stage for many others, including Asteroids.
Unfortunately, Borland's dismal management record, including a full blown name change and backtracking to the original name and countless mistakes have turned their main product Delphi into a pricey "boutique" programming language despite it's inherent qualities.
As a Delphi coder, I'm appalled by such a waste of energy and talent.
Bring back the "good old" Borland, with the "no nonsense" licensing scheme, a price tag for entry versions (legally usable !) designed to attract more coders, and the return of the kind of inspiration that led to Delphi 1, more than 10 years ago !