Version: 2008
  • On GameSpot: We try out down the PSP Go

October 10, 2006 4:00 AM PDT

Newsmaker: For Opera, smaller really is better

See all Newsmakers

(continued from previous page)

Opera's made no bones of the fact that you'd like to take market share from Microsoft. That's a pretty ambitious goal. Are you making any progress?
Wium Lie: We've been able to retain a 1 percent share across the whole world. In some markets, it's much higher. For example, in Australia, it's 5 percent, and in Russia, it's 10 percent. So you know, if I can challenge America here, like in the space race in the '50s: Russia is ahead of you, and you need to catch up! (Laughing.)

Of course, on the phones, we have a very different market situation. There we are, the market leader. We're shipping Opera in all sorts of phones; we're strong in the Japanese market. We've launched Opera Mini, which is a neat little application that enables the Web to be on almost every cell phone out there now.

I think the mobile market might be what forces Microsoft down from their dominant position. I'm sure a lot of people will just accept IE 7 as it comes along, and they will force it on people by putting it as part of a security update.

Could it be that most people will say, "Well, it's included with the operating system, so let's just use it"?
Wium Lie: Yeah. Indeed, our big challenge is the distribution channel.

Have you made any headway with the PC box makers?
Wium Lie: I don't think I have anything to report there. We need to convince users that we have a superior product that's free, that has many of the features that users would like to have. For example, we offer one feature, which is underestimated--or maybe just people don't know about. With Opera, a few mouse clicks let you delete all traces of what you've been doing.

What about your plans for rolling out more widgets? It seems that there are some gaps, with certain countries not represented.
Wium Lie: That's what the widget creators decide. We don't control them. That's like writing Web pages. It's not up to us; it's up to the widget creators.

Where are you, in terms of developing tools? Has the company has been talking about doing more in that sphere?
Wium Lie: I think you will see things like debuggers and a developers' toolbar. I think it's a very good idea to help support the developer. It's hard to be a Web developer if you want to ensure interoperability and correctness and things like that.

We want to do our part in helping. I don't think you're going to see a suite of authoring applications from us. I think there are enough other people who are doing AJAX toolkits. We don't have to do that.

Conceptually, as you look at the way operating browsers have been developing, do you think the browser of 2011 will look pretty much the same as it does today?
Wium Lie: It's an interesting question. I think some things are going to remain constant. For example, 10 years ago, I took a bet with somebody about whether HTML would be around 50 years from then. Now there are only 40 years left, but the computers we buy years in the future are going to be able to read the HTML created as of 1996.

Formats are going to be with us. There's so much content there, and there's really no reason to change them: HTML is here to stay; CSS, I hope; XML--all these acronyms that we're dealing with are here. They're going to evolve, but they're basically going to remain part of the same functionality. The user interface--that's the other part. I think the user interface is going to change a whole lot.

How so?
Wium Lie: We're going to see browsers in all sorts of units, not just mobile phones or game consoles or laptops. There's going to be a range of products. As people get addicted to these Web sites like CNET or Slashdot, they're going to want access to those all over. They're not going to be tied to a stationary PC or a laptop. They want ubiquitous access. So we're going to see browsers enter into places that we never thought about before.

Does the line between the browser and media player disappear?
Wium Lie: I think the browser will evolve into a media player. There is no reason why you should have a separate media player from an HTML viewer. Any data you throw at a browser should be able to be handled in a reasonable manner. You need to have some codecs, and there are some patents involved, probably. But I think it can be resolved.  

More Newsmakers

Previous page
Page 1 | 2

See more CNET content tagged:
Opera Software, CTO, focus, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Web browser

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (41 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
still doesn't support Hindi..
by cary1 October 10, 2006 5:21 AM PDT
I will stick to IE till opera is compliant with unicode
Reply to this comment
Does Support Hindi
by mnegandhi October 10, 2006 9:11 AM PDT
Evidently you don't test before you comment . Opera has had Unicode support for a number of versions. I view http://www.bbc.co.uk/hindi/ in Opera 9 without any rendering issues.
View all 2 replies
Opera Rendering
by jb3177 October 10, 2006 8:25 AM PDT
Unfortunately, opera does not render many web pages well, including my MyYahoo page. I really dislike having to fall back on IE or Firefox.
Reply to this comment
rendering
by Hardrada October 10, 2006 9:20 AM PDT
you show your ignorance. It's the web page that is not formatted properly. if they design the web page to standards Opera will render it properly. Opera is the most standards-compliant browser. See 'Website rendering' under http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticisms_of_Opera#Criticisms

Opera is one of few browsers which pass acid2 test. IE and firefox 2 don't pass it yet.
View reply
IE7 is a "paint job"?
by rcrusoe October 10, 2006 10:07 AM PDT
That's being kind. With all the problems IE continues to have, I'd
compare 7.0 to rebuilding a "total wreck".

Personally I think the the best thing MS has done lately is
publish ie70blocker.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?
FamilyID=4516A6F7-5D44-482B-9DBD-869B4A90159C&displa
ylang=en
Reply to this comment
Do you use it much?
by rapier1 October 10, 2006 10:43 AM PDT
Do you use IE7 with any regularity? What are the specific problems
you have with it?
View reply
Opera is better but inconvinient.
by Akiba October 10, 2006 10:27 AM PDT
First of all Opera is best browser available. A lot of the features and extensions Firefox fans brag about originated from a Opera as built in features.

Unfortunately being the most compliant browser doesn't make it the most convinient. In the real world I don't have the option of only visiting compliant websites. There are some features withing Opera that are supposed to deal with those issues but they just haven't worked for me. I have finally given up and wen't with firefox, out of convinience.
Reply to this comment
2nd rendering comment...
by otmf October 10, 2006 10:32 AM PDT
I've tried Opera on and off for years and they don't render many sites well. Com'on My Yahoo and Yahoo Mail are a must!
Reply to this comment
who's fault
by Hardrada October 10, 2006 10:57 AM PDT
I don't know why ppl don't understand. Yahoo just makes sure their website works on IE/firefox. They don't test it on other browsers. Though Opera is better standard-compliant, the website creator just ignores to test in Opera. It's not the browser's fault. It's the website's fault.
Yahoo works for me
by plings October 10, 2006 2:41 PM PDT
No problems with My Yahoo or Yahoo Mail here, using Opera 9...
Not an Opera fan
by cnutsucks October 10, 2006 11:35 AM PDT
My former company's webmaster would spend weeks on
http://www.teckmagazine.com/content/view/690/43/
end making our sites Opera-compatible. The web-based company is now on brink of bankruptcy because the sites weren't compatible with ALL other browsers. To the surprise of no one, the webmaster is now out of work.
Reply to this comment
Sounds like incompetence
by System Tyrant October 10, 2006 11:42 AM PDT
Don't blame Opera because you had a hack as a web developer. The guy may have had an infatuation with Opera, but it's not Opera's fault the guy couldn't develop a website properly.
I agree
by flaccid October 11, 2006 10:27 PM PDT
I am a client-side developer and use Opera as the primary dev browser.
Because of my knowledge and experience I can create valid sites that are compatible with most major browsers. It does not take more time, it takes less time.

You can be a 'web designer' and hack up something awful. Or you can be a 'web developer' of standards advocation and build something solid.
Why are you explaining...
by System Tyrant October 10, 2006 11:39 AM PDT
standards to the average web users. They don't care and they never will. They look at Opera and Firefox and try to compare it to IE. They view a webpage created using Frontpage in Firefox and Opera and then blame the browser because it won't render it like IE does. They don't, won't, or can't understand the difference.

Some of them are the same people who use Frontpage to create a website and call them selves web developers. They are the same people who think standards stink or the IE is the standard by which all sites should be created.

Please stop trying to explain anything to users. They will never understand and they will never care.
Reply to this comment
Because...
by plings October 10, 2006 2:38 PM PDT
The audience reading this piece is a bit more tech savvy than most people, and clearly this guy addresses the tech crowd.
Well..
by pmfjoe October 10, 2006 4:34 PM PDT
As has been said before though, and what many of you MS haters forget or refuse to get, is that since IE controld most of the browser market it is the defacto standard and if the browser I use doesnt display the site properly, but the site does work on the 2 largest browsers then I blame the browser not the site.
View all 2 replies
Opera rocks
by Efrow October 10, 2006 5:29 PM PDT
I've been using Opera since around version 3.6 (maybe 7-8 years ago?) on a 486 and never looked back. Can't use IE now - so cumbersome and slow. Trying to explain this to IE users is near impossible. But whatever - I'll surf along quickly, smoothly, and intuitively on the superior browser, and they can clunk along on theirs.

PS: Not bashing Firefox. It rocks too. I just prefer Opera.
Reply to this comment
AMEN, (Speaks the truth)
by 2shortguy October 31, 2006 5:03 AM PST
I have used Opera since v5.0 fell in love with it immediately, SPEED and ease. Everything else was a downer after that (IE sucks sludge fom a polluted river flowing through a dump). I've used Netscape and Firefox also,... OPERA is the KING, may he RULE forever!
Opera, Opera, Opera!
by Mendz October 11, 2006 4:37 AM PDT
I love this product. Ever since... Consider:

- the first with tabbed browsing
- the first with mouse gestures
- the fastest
- the most secure
- standards compliant

And now that they're free... awesome...
Reply to this comment
...don't forget NINTENDO!
by kuguy3000 October 14, 2006 5:49 PM PDT
Amazingly this article focused on everything except the one thing that may ultimately save this company...their singular partnership with Nintendo.

For those who don't know, Opera will be the sole provider of web browsing for both the Nintendo DS and upcoming Wii consoles. Word has it that both offer a great experience, and tech-heads should welcome the marriage of free-software and console hardware.
Reply to this comment
(41 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.72%) 73.00 10,270.47
S&P 500 (0.57%) 6.24 1,093.48
NASDAQ (0.88%) 18.86 2,167.88
CNET TECH (0.63%) 9.86 1,587.17
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right