August 31, 2006 7:00 AM PDT

Feds seek formal extension of Microsoft antitrust deal

The U.S. Department of Justice and Microsoft on Wednesday filed a formal application for a two-year extension of portions of their landmark antitrust settlement, with the possibility of stretching it until 2012.

The filing of the joint motion to a federal judge marks a largely procedural step. The government, with agreement from Microsoft, had already made its request for an extension known back in May.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, who approved the original consent decree in 2002, also indicated at the last periodic status conference with the parties that she would accept the changes, saying they appeared to be "the way to go" and prompted her to wonder why such a suggestion hadn't been raised earlier.

Under the proposed changes to the settlement, an expiration date of Nov. 12, 2009, would apply to provisions of the settlement relating to the Microsoft Communications Protocol Program (MCPP), which aims to help third-party developers in creating software that works with Windows through licensing access to protocols.

Microsoft would also be required, unless otherwise ordered by the court, to keep Robert Muglia, senior vice president for the company's server and tools unit, in charge of overseeing an ongoing rewrite of the technical documentation for MCPP licensees. Microsoft has taken heat in recent months from federal and state regulators and Judge Kollar-Kotelly, who accused the company of moving too slowly with that project. Muglia would have to be available to give the court periodic updates on the project's progress.

The remaining portions of the settlement, which relate to other licensing and middleware obligations, would expire, as scheduled, on Nov. 12, 2007. The government would have the "unilateral" ability to ask the court to extend the "surviving provisions" up to three more years. Microsoft has agreed not to oppose any such extensions.

The motion is likely to be addressed on Sept. 7, when parties are due back in Kollar-Kotelly's courtroom for their next status conference.

See more CNET content tagged:
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, antitrust, settlement, middleware, extension

8 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
Extension of a useless ruling.
So Microsoft will have to follow some of the dictates of the worthless Anti trust ruling for a few more years? Shocking. If the anti trust rulings had any teeth in the first place I would be glad. This will do nothing to limit the scope of Microsoft or encourage growth in company's that innovate or provide useful products.
Posted by ralfthedog (1589 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Maybe the ruling should mandate that MS have less than 70% market share?
The Japanese automakers use to have an agreement with US goverenment that their market share should not exceed some percentage.

IBM used to have such self restraint also. They would raise prices so that competition should have room to grow.
Posted by fc11 (48 comments )
Link Flag
Mortis9 says there are no...
Mortis9 says there are no special antitrust provisions that Microsoft is running under? Why doesn't Microsoft talk to him about this? What's going on here? Fool.
Posted by anarchyreigns (299 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Europe will do the job.
The US is too soft on micro soft.
They don't seem to understand that competition is actually good for the consumer.

Microsoft has eliminated customer choice.
Posted by t8 (3716 comments )
Reply Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.