July 31, 2007 4:56 PM PDT
FCC approves some open wireless requirements
- Related Stories
Google bets on mobile marketJuly 31, 2007
Google's battle for wireless spectrumJuly 30, 2007
Google lobbies for 'open' wireless networksJune 14, 2007
FCC to reveal spectrum auction planApril 25, 2007
Public safety bids stir spectrum spatMarch 2, 2007
Why cable companies, Google are eyeing wireless spectrumMay 11, 2006
- Related Blogs
Open Access to New Wireless Spectrum?
July 26, 2007
FCC to vote on 700MHz spectrum auction rules
July 25, 2007
Google commits $4.6 billion to wireless-spectrum auction
July 20, 2007
Could Google kill the cell phone industry?
July 20, 2007
Feds to require 'open' wireless networks?
July 10, 2007
As was hinted in recent weeks, the Federal Communications Commission approved that requirement as part of broader rules for auctioning licenses in the coveted 700MHz analog television band. The vote was technically 5-0, although one commissioner delivered a blistering critique of the so-called "open access" requirement.
Congress has mandated the airwaves in the 700MHz band be vacated in February 2009, forcing analog TV broadcasters off those channels as part of a long-anticipated switch to all-digital television. Current and would-be wireless broadband operators are eager to get their hands on the spectrum because of its inherent physical properties, which allow signals to travel farther and more easily penetrate walls.
FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said Tuesday's action indicates the agency's commitment "to ensuring that the fruits of wireless innovation swiftly pass into the hands of consumers."
"While I recognize the rules we are adopting today may not be the garment any one company wants, the public interest is not what any one company wants, it's about serving the people," Martin added.
But companies such as Google, along with several consumer activist groups, see the current rules as only a partial victory. While they praised the commission for taking a first step in offering consumers more choice in terms of devices and applications they will use on these new networks, they also criticized the commission for not going far enough.
They argue that without a comprehensive set of "open access" rules that also requires license winners to wholesale network capacity at affordable prices, there's no guarantee that well-entrenched wireless operators won't restrict consumer choices on the new spectrum.
Richard Whitt, Google's Washington telecommunications and media counsel, also said that without these provisions, it would be very difficult for a new entrant to go up against an incumbent to bid on the spectrum.
"Because (an incumbent) already has a nationwide network and a customer base with an active revenue stream they can go to almost any limit and bid above fair market value to protect their business," he said.
Google had said previously it would bid at least $4.6 billion in the auction if the FCC adopted rules based on four open-access principles, which included open access for devices and applications, as well as rules, for open wholesaling. Whitt clarified the company "didn't state we wouldn't bid if these conditions weren't met." But he said Google will need some time to study the FCC's rules before it can make a decision about participating in the auction.
Still, Whitt said Google is pleased that the rules for open device and application access also come with stronger enforcement provisions for dealing with license holders who don't comply with the rule, something he said Martin's original proposal did not include.
"Based on where we thought we were, we are in somewhat better shape," he said. "We are encouraged that the agency adopted something that is tougher in terms of enforcement, but it's too early to make a judgment about all the details of the rules."
The two Democratic commissioners--Michael Copps and Jonathan Adelstein--echoed Google's sentiments with gripes that the rules did not go farther.
"A wholesale requirement would have leveled the playing field for companies that want to get into the network business but cannot break through the defenses erected by the massive incumbents who dominate the industry," Copps said. "It is not hard to see why companies with extensive networks and millions of customers are generally able to outbid new entrants, even deep-pocketed ones."
A number of other companies, including Cisco Systems, eBay's Skype and Nokia, were quick to call the vote a positive development. Their representatives said in separate statements that the FCC's rules would help pave the way to more choices for consumers.
Not everyone took such a rosy view of the rules. Republican Commissioner Robert McDowell stopped short of a complete endorsement of the rules, accusing his colleagues of "rushing headlong to regulate...without a sincere effort to broker a private sector solution to any perceived imperfections."
"In an effort to favor a specific business plan, the agency has fashioned a highly tailored garment that may fit no one," McDowell said just before the vote. He even went so far as to warn that "commission has received no assurances that any company is actually interested in bidding in incumbent spectrum."
His position drew support from Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas), the ranking member of the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee, who assailed what he called "the FCC's decision to rig the 700MHz auction at the suggestion of companies such as Google" as harmful to the wireless industry.
"Google and others are free to use the spectrum under their proposed business models if they pay fair market value in an honest auction," Barton said in a statement released after the vote. "Google alone has a market cap of approximately $160 billion, almost $40 billion more than Verizon."
The wireless industry's trade association, CTIA, also criticized the commission's rules on open device access.
"We are disappointed that a significant portion of this valuable spectrum will be encumbered with mandates that could significantly reduce the number of interested bidders," CTIA President and CEO Steve Largent said in a statement. "We remain committed to the principle that wireless consumers and American taxpayers are best served when such a valuable commodity is auctioned in a fair and competitive manner with no strings attached."
Whether the open-access rules will truly transform the mobile industry as a whole is harder to predict. For one thing, they have no direct bearing on wireless spectrum already in use by consumers today.
What's more, the rules apply only to the 22MHz of spectrum that is being auctioned off. So, for example, if Verizon Wireless won these licenses, it would likely use this spectrum to augment its existing nationwide network. In theory, subscribers could bring their own phone to the new network, but the phone or third-party application that they've downloaded would work only in regions where Verizon has won and built out its network using the 700MHz licenses.
8 commentsJoin the conversation! Add your comment