July 7, 2005 9:11 AM PDT

E-mail traffic doubles after London bomb blasts

E-mail traffic doubled in Europe on Thursday after four bombs exploded in central London.

A snapshot of e-mail activity from security company MessageLabs found the number of customer e-mails it monitored grew from the average of 500,000 to 1 million an hour after terrorist attacks began.

"Sometime after 9:00 a.m. BST (1 a.m. PDT) we saw e-mail traffic rise," said Alex Shipp, senior antivirus technologist for MessageLabs. "That's ignoring spam--that's half a million legitimate e-mails an hour up to 1 million.

"We don't know what the traffic is, but we're guessing that it's 'Are you OK?' and 'Have you seen the news?' messages. But that's based on the e-mails we've been getting."

Related photos
The world witnesses
Citizens share photos of the London
blasts on sites around the Web.

Vodafone, the U.K.'s largest mobile operator, is asking customers to avoid using their phones following the attacks. All the United Kingdom's mobile phone networks were intermittently crippled by the sudden rise in calls and text messages early Thursday morning.

At least 45 people were killed when three bombs exploded on the London Underground train network and a fourth detonated on a double-decker bus, according to Sky News. London hospitals have reported at least 300 wounded so far.

Prime Minister Tony Blair condemned the attacks. Other leaders of the G8 countries, who are currently meeting in Scotland, supported Blair.

London Mayor Ken Livingstone has described the attacks as an "indiscriminate attempt at mass murder."

A group calling itself the "Secret Organization of al-Qaeda in Europe" is reported to have posted a message on a Web site claiming responsibility for the attacks. London police said no groups have contacted them claiming responsibility.

Dan Ilett of Silicon.com reported from London.

4 comments

Join the conversation!
Add your comment
A way to handle sudden rises...
I think the mobile phone companies need to find a way to handle the rise in usage when emergency situations happen. Asking people to not use a phone is not the answer. These people NEED to call their family and friends during such incidents.
Posted by (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
How?
It is a nice thought, but it just isn't possible. Even ignoring the fact that it is not profitable to be ready at all times for a once every five years surge, it simply isn't possible with the avaliable technology. There is not enough bandwidth to handle millions deciding to call at once within a single cell.
Posted by Andrew J Glina (1673 comments )
Link Flag
A way to handle sudden rises...
I think the mobile phone companies need to find a way to handle the rise in usage when emergency situations happen. Asking people to not use a phone is not the answer. These people NEED to call their family and friends during such incidents.
Posted by (5 comments )
Reply Link Flag
How?
It is a nice thought, but it just isn't possible. Even ignoring the fact that it is not profitable to be ready at all times for a once every five years surge, it simply isn't possible with the avaliable technology. There is not enough bandwidth to handle millions deciding to call at once within a single cell.
Posted by Andrew J Glina (1673 comments )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.

What's Hot

Discussions

Shared

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.