June 2, 2006 1:35 PM PDT
Dotster named in massive cybersquatting suit
- Related Stories
-
Apple wins iTunes cybersquatting battle
March 15, 2005 -
WebEx hits Citrix with cybersquatting suit
February 3, 2005 -
Feds pull suspicious .gov site
February 5, 2003 -
Mattel loses cybersquatting challenge
November 8, 2002 -
Political cybersquatting scores a win
April 29, 2002
The lawsuit, filed Thursday by high-end retailers Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman, alleges that Dotster abused its status as a registrar by "checking out" hundreds of domain names that closely resemble the correct ones--and then keeping only the ones that were visited by Web users who couldn't spell very well.
The misspelled domain name NeimuMarcus.com, when visited by CNET News.com on Thursday evening, included code in its Web page that references Dotster and its subsidiary RevenueDirect.com--and featured advertisements for Neiman Marcus rivals such as Bloomingdales and JCrew. By early Friday, however, that Web site and dozens more had been taken offline.
lists domains that are allegedly
operated by Dotster and are similar
to trademarks.
Cybersquatting, the practice of registering domain names that may violate a company's trademark, is hardly new--it's been around for more than a decade. Also called typosquatting, it's led to high-profile spats such as Apple Computer's successful attempt to claim iTunes.co.uk and Canadian teenager Mike Rowe's registration of MikeRoweSoft.com.
But this Dotster lawsuit involves allegations of a new twist on the concept: a registrar using its special status with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers to secure misspelled domains temporarily for a few days, measure the traffic, and then pay for only the ones that would be lucrative in terms of advertising.
Dotster did not respond to repeated messages left on Friday with its legal department and two other employees.
Neiman Marcus and Bergdorf Goodman's complaint and exhibits, which total 155 pages, include excerpts from a conversation with Dotster employee Scott Fish, who allegedly asked for $1,000 for the name BergmanGoodman.com.
"It gets a good amount of traffic right now, and would be a great domain to brand," said a purported e-mail message from Fish to a prospective purchaser.
The unnamed purchaser replied: "$1,000? Really? Would you take $500 for it, paid through Paypal?" according to the e-mail exchange included with the complaint.
Fish eventually agreed to sell it for $800, according to the alleged exchange.
While other registrars have been accused of this practice, and typosquatting has even been the target of a Microsoft Research project called "Typo-Patrol," this appears to be the first dispute with a registrar that's led to a lawsuit.
"What's unusual about (the allegation) is that it's not just any cybersquatter, it's a registrar, which is a problem," said Ann Ford, the managing partner of DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary's Washington, D.C., office, who specializes in trademark and copyright law.
Ford added that a lawsuit, rather than ICANN arbitration (a common way of resolving domain name disputes), was appropriate in cases involving registrar malfeasance. "Money damages as well as injunctive relief will better serve to shut down this typosquatter--if it is indeed the identified registrar--as opposed to simply having the existing bad faith domains transferred," she said.
The lawsuit--filed by the law firms of Christie Parker and Hale and Perkins Coie--charges that Dotster violated federal laws against trademark infringement and dilution, federal cybersquatting laws, and Washington state consumer protection laws against deceptive acts and practices.
See more CNET content tagged:
Dotster, registrar, domain name, lawsuit, domain
30 comments
Join the conversation! Add your comment
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://domainnamewire.com/2005/12/30/is-godaddy-typosquatting/" target="_newWindow">http://domainnamewire.com/2005/12/30/is-godaddy-typosquatting/</a>
Also, you don't have to be a registrar to get the 5 day grace period to "test" domains for traffic. Many registrars extend this benefit to customers.
And yes, there is rumor of some registrars offering the 5 day grace period to their customers. Go Daddy is *NOT* one of the companies. They have been a HUGE voice in exposing this flim flam scam. Even stating the of 35 million domains registered in one month 32 million where cancelled within the 5 day grace period. note: *FACT* Go Daddy does *NOT* allow any grace period. For more information read <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.bobparsons.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.bobparsons.com</a>
Hats off to the coprate rights over everything simmliar to them.
* a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights
* the domain name owner has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and
* the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
ALL three must be proven in order for the domain name to be ruled illegal.
So if I register the domain GeoBush.com old georgie might have something to say about it. But if I run the website as a geo caching site that deals with only geo caching in wilderness settings I am just fine.
Bad faith and confusion have the most to do with the loss of a domain name.
Hats off to the coprate rights over everything simmliar to them.
* a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights
* the domain name owner has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and
* the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.
ALL three must be proven in order for the domain name to be ruled illegal.
So if I register the domain GeoBush.com old georgie might have something to say about it. But if I run the website as a geo caching site that deals with only geo caching in wilderness settings I am just fine.
Bad faith and confusion have the most to do with the loss of a domain name.
Come on this company is one of the most untrustworthy in the industry. Their customer support is wretched and their control panel is even worse.
- www.thehostguru.com
Come on this company is one of the most untrustworthy in the industry. Their customer support is wretched and their control panel is even worse.
- www.thehostguru.com
Twice I have searched for a domain name using the search window at GoDaddy and both times someone bought the domain within 8 hours. I placed an order with my IPS before going to bed. When I awoke in the morning someone else owned my domain.
For GoDaddy to be in the business of registering domains while selling them out from under potential customers should be a violation of law. It certainly means GoDaddy has no integrity
GODADDY SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN, AND SUED!!!! IF ICANN IS TURNING A BLIND EYE TO THIS KIND OF BUSINESS PRACTICE THE WORLD NEEDS TO BRING THE AX DOWN ON ICANN TOO!!!!
This is like a realitor writing a contract for a homebuyer attaching the escrow check and then going to another potential buyer and using it to get a higher offer for the seller, back dating his contract. If caught they would end up losing their license and be in jail!!!
Part of the domain registering business involves a fiduciary duty to protect trade secrets. I entrust my ideas when I type a domain into their search engine to see if it is available. If they are preditors and can cut me off because they are closer to the main trunk line of the Internet or are turning around selling my searches to speculators then GODADDY VIOLATED TRUST OF THE HIGHEST ORDER!!!!
Spred the Word GODADDY SUCKS!!!!
It is straight out crooked. I wanted to tell everyone DON'T USE GODADDY FOR ANYTHING!!! For sure don't use their search window if your looking for a domain because they will sell it out from under you before you can get it bought!!!
Twice I have searched for a domain name using the search window at GoDaddy and both times someone bought the domain within 8 hours. I placed an order with my IPS before going to bed. When I awoke in the morning someone else owned my domain.
For GoDaddy to be in the business of registering domains while selling them out from under potential customers should be a violation of law. It certainly means GoDaddy has no integrity
GODADDY SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN, AND SUED!!!! IF ICANN IS TURNING A BLIND EYE TO THIS KIND OF BUSINESS PRACTICE THE WORLD NEEDS TO BRING THE AX DOWN ON ICANN TOO!!!!
This is like a realitor writing a contract for a homebuyer attaching the escrow check and then going to another potential buyer and using it to get a higher offer for the seller, back dating his contract. If caught they would end up losing their license and be in jail!!!
Part of the domain registering business involves a fiduciary duty to protect trade secrets. I entrust my ideas when I type a domain into their search engine to see if it is available. If they are preditors and can cut me off because they are closer to the main trunk line of the Internet or are turning around selling my searches to speculators then GODADDY VIOLATED TRUST OF THE HIGHEST ORDER!!!!
Spred the Word GODADDY SUCKS!!!!
It is straight out crooked. I wanted to tell everyone DON'T USE GODADDY FOR ANYTHING!!! For sure don't use their search window if your looking for a domain because they will sell it out from under you before you can get it bought!!!
<a class="jive-link-external" href="http://domainnamewire.com/2005/12/30/is-godaddy-typosquatting/" target="_newWindow">http://domainnamewire.com/2005/12/30/is-godaddy-typosquatting/</a>
Also, you don't have to be a registrar to get the 5 day grace period to "test" domains for traffic. Many registrars extend this benefit to customers.
And yes, there is rumor of some registrars offering the 5 day grace period to their customers. Go Daddy is *NOT* one of the companies. They have been a HUGE voice in exposing this flim flam scam. Even stating the of 35 million domains registered in one month 32 million where cancelled within the 5 day grace period. note: *FACT* Go Daddy does *NOT* allow any grace period. For more information read <a class="jive-link-external" href="http://www.bobparsons.com" target="_newWindow">http://www.bobparsons.com</a>