Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: New TV sex symbol: Vintage black PORSCHE

December 7, 2004 11:32 AM PST

Does the 'Halo 2' effect threaten broadband?

  • 16 comments
The rapid growth in online game playing will put pressure on broadband networks to evolve, according to research published this week by Sandvine.

The Internet traffic-monitoring company said Tuesday that Microsoft's "Halo 2"--a popular first-person shooter game--has boosted traffic on Xbox Live as players rush to compete over the Net.

Sandvine's latest statistics showed that Xbox Live traffic quadrupled when "Halo 2" was launched on Nov. 9, and it has stayed at that level since. Sandvine claims that this will put added pressure on ISPs to improve the quality of their broadband offerings, as users will demand reliability and low latency.

"The explosion in X-Box Live traffic attributed to 'Halo 2' should be seen as a clarion call," Marc Morin, chief technology officer of Sandvine, said in a statement.

"ISPs need to enhance the broadband experience for these high-end users by prioritizing or reserving bandwidth for games and other kinds of latency-sensitive and feature-rich applications," Morin added.

British telecommunications giant BT, whose network supports most of the United Kingdom's ISPs, argues that there are a lot of reasons why an online-game session might suffer from network disruptions like poor latency.

"It depends where the players are based," said a BT representative. "A session where four gamers are all based in the U.K. is likely to have pretty low latency. If one is based in America, one in Australia and one in Brazil, then there's more chance of latency because of Internet lag."

ISPs see online games as an application that could tempt many people-- both PC and console users--to broadband. At present though, according to BT, online games account for only a small proportion of overall Internet traffic, so the increase caused by "Halo 2" shouldn't have massive implications for telecommunications providers.

In the long term, BT's 21st Century Network--under which it will move from today's legacy equipment to an all-IP infrastructure over the next few years--could make the United Kingdom a leader for online games.

"The 21st Century Network will hopefully mean there will be much less latency for gamers," said the BT representative.

Graeme Wearden of ZDNet UK reported from London.

See more CNET content tagged:
Sandvine, Halo 2, latency, British Telecommunications, online game

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
So what your really telling me...
by December 7, 2004 12:19 PM PST
...is that they released a study that says more service providers should use their products. That is amazing!
Reply to this comment
So what your really telling me...
by December 7, 2004 12:19 PM PST
...is that they released a study that says more service providers should use their products. That is amazing!
Reply to this comment
I completely agree with Sandvine
by December 7, 2004 3:01 PM PST
If the BT rep is reading this, Halo 2 actually has a matchmaking service in which it matches you with people as close to you as possible with the best ping as possible, so the problem isn't how far away someone is that is the problem.
Reply to this comment
I completely agree with Sandvine
by December 7, 2004 3:01 PM PST
If the BT rep is reading this, Halo 2 actually has a matchmaking service in which it matches you with people as close to you as possible with the best ping as possible, so the problem isn't how far away someone is that is the problem.
Reply to this comment
BT kills online gaming
by aabcdefghij987654321 December 8, 2004 5:22 AM PST
While I lived in United Kingdom last year, gaming friends complained that they couldn't play online games because the bandwidth was horrible. The majority of online connections were just dial-ups. So they just accepted it and never bothered to buy the gear needed to play online. Instead they just invited fellow gamers over to play. Friends who were serious gamers actually moved to the very few places in town that offered broadband service. Before renting out a flat they went to BT and gave them the postcode (zipcode) of that flat to confirm it had broadband. The reason was that one street could have broadband and the next steet didn't.
Reply to this comment
BT kills online gaming
by aabcdefghij987654321 December 8, 2004 5:22 AM PST
While I lived in United Kingdom last year, gaming friends complained that they couldn't play online games because the bandwidth was horrible. The majority of online connections were just dial-ups. So they just accepted it and never bothered to buy the gear needed to play online. Instead they just invited fellow gamers over to play. Friends who were serious gamers actually moved to the very few places in town that offered broadband service. Before renting out a flat they went to BT and gave them the postcode (zipcode) of that flat to confirm it had broadband. The reason was that one street could have broadband and the next steet didn't.
Reply to this comment
BT kills online gaming
by aabcdefghij987654321 December 8, 2004 5:39 AM PST
While I lived in United Kingdom last year, gaming friends complained that they couldn't play online games because the bandwidth was horrible. The majority of online connections were just dial-ups. So they just accepted it and never bothered to buy the gear needed to play online. Instead they just invited fellow gamers over to play. Friends who were serious gamers actually moved to the very few places in town that offered broadband service. Before renting out a flat they went to BT and gave them the postcode (zipcode) of that flat to confirm it had broadband. The reason was that one street could have broadband and the next steet didn't.
Reply to this comment
BT kills online gaming
by aabcdefghij987654321 December 8, 2004 5:39 AM PST
While I lived in United Kingdom last year, gaming friends complained that they couldn't play online games because the bandwidth was horrible. The majority of online connections were just dial-ups. So they just accepted it and never bothered to buy the gear needed to play online. Instead they just invited fellow gamers over to play. Friends who were serious gamers actually moved to the very few places in town that offered broadband service. Before renting out a flat they went to BT and gave them the postcode (zipcode) of that flat to confirm it had broadband. The reason was that one street could have broadband and the next steet didn't.
Reply to this comment
Service levels will have to evolve
by December 8, 2004 7:00 PM PST
... and everyone remembers that mad dash to V.90 as the make or break in the ISP world. Everything changes with the applications that consume more of a resource.
Reply to this comment
Service levels will have to evolve
by December 8, 2004 7:00 PM PST
... and everyone remembers that mad dash to V.90 as the make or break in the ISP world. Everything changes with the applications that consume more of a resource.
Reply to this comment
Games shouldn't get "priority"
by 202567676114204908075970046337 December 10, 2004 8:41 AM PST
Increasing the total available bandwidth is always good, but there's no reason to give games any special priority. In fact, as a non-gamer, I'd prefer to see them given *lower* priority if the bandwidth is shared with other users. If the customer is paying for dedicated bandwidth, of course, then it's not an issue, but in a shared bandwidth situation (like cable), games shouldn't be allowed to interfere with other users' applications.
Reply to this comment
If they pay
by royc December 11, 2004 7:55 PM PST
for the added priority and bandwidth would that make it easier for you to take?

They pay for the X-box, the game, and Broadband service. I assume they pay a M$ tax each month. :)
I see a chance for ISPs to get in on this too.

I am not a game player execpt for a turn based game.
I get to play and make 15 moves then you get your moves then someone else gets a turn and the next day we all get another set of moves.
Games shouldn't get "priority"
by 202567676114204908075970046337 December 10, 2004 8:41 AM PST
Increasing the total available bandwidth is always good, but there's no reason to give games any special priority. In fact, as a non-gamer, I'd prefer to see them given *lower* priority if the bandwidth is shared with other users. If the customer is paying for dedicated bandwidth, of course, then it's not an issue, but in a shared bandwidth situation (like cable), games shouldn't be allowed to interfere with other users' applications.
Reply to this comment
If they pay
by royc December 11, 2004 7:55 PM PST
for the added priority and bandwidth would that make it easier for you to take?

They pay for the X-box, the game, and Broadband service. I assume they pay a M$ tax each month. :)
I see a chance for ISPs to get in on this too.

I am not a game player execpt for a turn based game.
I get to play and make 15 moves then you get your moves then someone else gets a turn and the next day we all get another set of moves.
Peer to Peer services tampered with
by kenwilli February 16, 2007 7:13 AM PST
Networks with asymmetrical limitations have deployed peer to peer mitigation devices in order to preserve the performance of the slower side of their asymmetric networks. P-P was perceived as a nusance service running on a user's PC and the user was unaware of it. The blocking or slowing of P-P traffic was heralded as a huge success. However, blocking P-P wholesale affects valid P-P user experiences. The trend seems to be toward more symmetrical data usage not just one-way web surfing and email downloads. Modern networks must address the delay and symmetry going forward.
Reply to this comment
Peer to Peer services tampered with
by kenwilli February 16, 2007 7:13 AM PST
Networks with asymmetrical limitations have deployed peer to peer mitigation devices in order to preserve the performance of the slower side of their asymmetric networks. P-P was perceived as a nusance service running on a user's PC and the user was unaware of it. The blocking or slowing of P-P traffic was heralded as a huge success. However, blocking P-P wholesale affects valid P-P user experiences. The trend seems to be toward more symmetrical data usage not just one-way web surfing and email downloads. Modern networks must address the delay and symmetry going forward.
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Microsoft (0.82%) 0.24 29.36
Dow Jones Industrials (-0.91%) -93.79 10,197.47
S&P 500 (-1.03%) -11.27 1,087.24
NASDAQ (-0.83%) -17.88 2,149.02
CNET TECH (-0.46%) -7.19 1,572.60
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right