- Related Stories
-
AOL clarifies IM privacy guarantee
March 14, 2005 -
Microsoft to punch up corporate IM
March 6, 2005 -
Triple threat: IM viruses get big jump on 2005
February 14, 2005 -
Comcast to launch IM with video
January 10, 2005 -
To airmen, from the Air Force: New IM tool
December 23, 2004
(continued from previous page)
looking at the problem, there's the reality that some of these threats could merge with the mobile threats."
Weafer contended that even when IM software makers address new viruses, it will be very hard to get people to update their devices, especially mobile phones.
"It's a social engineering issue," he said. "It's not so difficult to correct software flaws, but it's a monumental task in order to get people to download patches, or even to be aware that they need to get the necessary changes."
On the other hand, viruses that spread through PC-based IM clients might not be able to infect phone-based IM software, Weafer pointed out. In addition, most handset makers download automatic software updates to their models, which means they could protect devices without telling consumers they were doing so.
Neither AOL or Microsoft have made plans to launch marketing campaigns to alert people to IM threats, representatives for the companies said.
The increasing popularity of public IM applications in workplaces has opened corporate networks up to the threat of attacks too. But businesses tend to be less vulnerable targets than consumers, experts said, because most companies already have already installed firewalls and other protective technology. In addition, many companies won't allow employees to download certain files, such as attachments, over public IM networks.
Despite all this, some experts have predicted that a sharp increase in instant messaging virus attacks could cause many businesses that do not use corporate IM systems, or customized software meant just for in-house use, to reconsider whether to let workers install the applications.
According to these industry watchers, the best way to help people protect themselves is to instill the same distrust regarding Web links or attachments sent via IM that they have been taught to apply to e-mail.
"People will need to relearn what they've been told in the past about e-mail, but there are some new things, and it will take time to get the message across," said Shane Coursen, senior technology consultant for antivirus researcher Kaspersky Labs. "Software companies can only do so much to inform their customers. You have to convince them to look at every link or attachment with suspicion."
See more CNET content tagged:
margin, IM threat, IM, MSN Messenger, attack





In my opinion this article really isn't necessary with products like BlowSearch's BSM Messenger around. Instead of complaining about the issue - offer a solution.
Perhaps there may be one or two groups of people who NEED IM. But for the remaining 99.9% - it's unnecessary & a security risk. Why take risks with security ?
Hell - most of today's population don't even NEED cell phones, if they could just ORGANISE themselves ;-)
- One of the biggest problems here...
- by Prndll April 4, 2005 3:11 PM PDT
- ...is the idea of putting 13 year old children on the internet. The internet is no place for children. There is a reason why ISP's do not sell to 13 year olds. There are too many things out on the net that only represents trouble for children this age. Wether it be viri or pedophiles, extreme porn to getting sued by the RIAA. I do agree that parents need to teach their children about computers. But, just cutting them loose to be exposed to the world like this is nothing short of irresponsible.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)